|
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
From: "Dan Webb" <d...@danwebb.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 03:22:23 +0000
Local: Sat 26 Jan 2008 03:22
Subject: Re: Prototype + lowpro vs. JQuery
On 1/21/08, Matt Aimonetti <mattaimone...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It would be awesome to port the low pro syntax to JQuery. Now the thing is, I've considered doing this myself. Ive used both jquery and prototype > low pro is just a tiny abstraction layer above proto, in theory we should be > able to port the same layer to JQuery. heavily in the past. The reason I like prototype over jquery is that prototype offers more general programming tools where as jquery is just about dealing with the DOM. Secondarily, in my experience, the chaining idiom in jquery tempts people into writing some pretty unreadable code. However, jquery is really compact, very well documented and does its $('.date').attach(DatePicker, { opt1: 34 }); Would do the job, I can even bring over the inheritance stuff...and Cheers for bringing this up... -- aim: danwrong123 You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||