Firefox 3.5...let's fix it. - Low Pro

Message from discussion Firefox 3.5...let's fix it.
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.219.224 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of d...@danwebb.net) client-ip=209.85.219.224;
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <5b3e279f0906300922r1fc08550udd0bee57eb9b7af9@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5b3e279f0906300922r1fc08550udd0bee57eb9b7af9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:16:47 +0100
Message-ID: <5b3e279f0906301016k1b201a79xf9554d66577f5d7f@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Firefox 3.5...let's fix it.
From: Dan Webb <d...@danwebb.net>
To: low-pro@googlegroups.com

Woah, just from running the test pages it seems that things are pretty
messy.  It looks like its something to do with the inheritance code
which is nearly identical to prototypes except for the way the
constructor is created...and that bit is pretty hairy to be fair.  So,
I'm going to dig in to this and try to root out the problem.  This
should probably fix most if not all of the problems we are
experiencing though.

If anyone else wants to dig in and assist that would be great.

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Dan Webb<d...@danwebb.net> wrote:
> Yes, so this looks like it needs addressing urgently. =A0I was really
> hoping it was just a regression but no such luck. =A0I need to read back
> through all these posts but if anyone can summarise the problems
> they've encountered so far here that would be a great help.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Zeno<zeno.crive...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, Firefox v3.5 (final) has just been announced and many (Low Pro)
>> stuff seems to be broken
>>
>> Grrrr
>>
>> Maybe we should start a new thread about FF related issues (talking
>> about this in the Safari 4 thread is not very appropriate)
>>
>>
>>
>> On 29 June, 00:17, pushrod_admin <pushrodme...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> This prob seemed to go away, but has now come back (for me) with the
>>> latestFirefoxRC for Mac. ANyone else seeing this?
>>>
>>> On 31 May, 11:51, Dan Webb <d...@danwebb.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > Yep, that's good news. =A0I expected it to be the case as it looked m=
ore
>>> > like a regression inFirefoxthan a bug in Low Pro.
>>>
>>> > Thanks for letting us know, Nathan.
>>>
>>> > On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 11:48 AM, MRoderick <roderick.mor...@gmail.co=
m> wrote:
>>>
>>> > > On 31 May, 09:46, Nathan <XGamer...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> Well good news! Downloaded a newfirefox3.5 nightly (Shiretoko/
>>> > >> 3.5pre) and this version works perfectly with my sample case and w=
ith
>>> > >> my full website. They must have fixed the bug. This is excellent
>>> > >> excellent news for me and lowpro users everywhere. Crisis averted.=
 I
>>> > >> can't wait for 3.5b5 which will hopefully incorporate this change.
>>>
>>> > > That is great news! Thanks for reporting it :-)
>>>
>>> > > /morgan
>>>
>>> > --
>>> > Dan Webbhttp://massiverobot.co.ukhttp://www.danwebb.net
>>>
>>> > aim: danwrong123
>>> > twitter/skype: danwrong
>> >>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dan Webb
> http://massiverobot.co.uk
> http://www.danwebb.net
>
> aim: danwrong123
> twitter/skype: danwrong
>



--=20
Dan Webb
http://massiverobot.co.uk
http://www.danwebb.net

aim: danwrong123
twitter/skype: danwrong