<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>Inclusional Research Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research</link>
  <description>A discussion forum for members of the &amp;#39;Inclusional Research Forum and Learning Space&amp;#39; (www.inclusional-research.org).</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Two different concepts of &#39;balance&#39; in the foundations of &#39;ethics&#39;.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/915746147fe61ed4/fa5f38633324d5d1?show_docid=fa5f38633324d5d1</link>
  <description>
  P.S. it strikes me that Vygotsky’s ideas on concept formation (in &lt;br&gt; ‘Thought and Language’) may shed some light on our discussion, and &lt;br&gt; suggest some appropriate terminology to distinguish between rational- &lt;br&gt; intellection and intuitive-intellection (and ‘inclusional &lt;br&gt; intellection’). &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Vygotsky points out that the realm of prelingual thought is ‘bigger
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/915746147fe61ed4/fa5f38633324d5d1?show_docid=fa5f38633324d5d1</guid>
  <author>
  emili...@goodshare.org
  (emile)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2008 00:06:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Two different concepts of &#39;balance&#39; in the foundations of &#39;ethics&#39;.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/915746147fe61ed4/920f482875d967ed?show_docid=920f482875d967ed</link>
  <description>
  dear alan, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;this is difficult going (to share subtle differences in intent which &lt;br&gt; probably reflect preference due to differences in political ambiance &lt;br&gt; in our respective situations and endeavors). &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;of course i do not see eckhart tolle’s work in terms of a suspension &lt;br&gt; of intellection as being the desired state in contradiction to the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/915746147fe61ed4/920f482875d967ed?show_docid=920f482875d967ed</guid>
  <author>
  emili...@goodshare.org
  (emile)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:25:03 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Fw: Fw: Two different concepts of &#39;balance&#39; in thefoundationsof &#39;ethics&#39;.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/6fa94fd5a5f5f265/cf6709dfddb96583?show_docid=cf6709dfddb96583</link>
  <description>
  ----- Original Message ----- &lt;br&gt; To: &amp;quot;Alan Rayner (BU)&amp;quot; &amp;lt;a.d.m.ray...@bath.ac.uk&amp;gt;; &amp;quot;Cathie Pearce&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;C.Pea...@mmu.ac.uk&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 4:30 PM &lt;br&gt; &#39;ethics&#39;.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/6fa94fd5a5f5f265/cf6709dfddb96583?show_docid=cf6709dfddb96583</guid>
  <author>
  a.d.m.ray...@bath.ac.uk
  (Alan Rayner (BU))
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:00:18 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Fw: Two different concepts of &#39;balance&#39; in the foundationsof &#39;ethics&#39;.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/ea93f3d155786022/4af4e738a49c1985?show_docid=4af4e738a49c1985</link>
  <description>
  ----- Original Message ----- &lt;br&gt; To: &amp;quot;Cathie Pearce&amp;quot; &amp;lt;C.Pea...@mmu.ac.uk&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 4:15 PM &lt;br&gt; &#39;ethics&#39;.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/ea93f3d155786022/4af4e738a49c1985?show_docid=4af4e738a49c1985</guid>
  <author>
  a.d.m.ray...@bath.ac.uk
  (Alan Rayner (BU))
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:16:31 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Two different concepts of &#39;balance&#39; in the foundations of &#39;ethics&#39;.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/915746147fe61ed4/af7209830062ec4d?show_docid=af7209830062ec4d</link>
  <description>
  PS. I don&#39;t see-feel inclusionality as a half-way house to &#39;endarkenment&#39;. I &lt;br&gt; feel-see endarkenment as a more than half way house to inclusionality. &lt;br&gt; Whereas endarkenment may indeed cut us adrift in meditative repose on a sea &lt;br&gt; of nothingness, blissfully oblivious, in the moment, of our human &lt;br&gt; companionship, vulnerability and needs, inclusionality can indeed bring
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/915746147fe61ed4/af7209830062ec4d?show_docid=af7209830062ec4d</guid>
  <author>
  a.d.m.ray...@bath.ac.uk
  (Alan Rayner (BU))
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 11:15:03 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Two different concepts of &#39;balance&#39; in the foundations of &#39;ethics&#39;.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/915746147fe61ed4/38f2343c78eeaf7c?show_docid=38f2343c78eeaf7c</link>
  <description>
  Dear Ted, &lt;br&gt; Yes, I am sure we are, in principle, in full accord on this and that we &lt;br&gt; simply have different ways of expressing, in language, the same insight. But &lt;br&gt; maybe the different expressions we are using relate to some important &lt;br&gt; underlying issues to do with the communication and intellectual implications
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/915746147fe61ed4/38f2343c78eeaf7c?show_docid=38f2343c78eeaf7c</guid>
  <author>
  a.d.m.ray...@bath.ac.uk
  (Alan Rayner (BU))
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 08:31:23 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Two different concepts of &#39;balance&#39; in the foundations of &#39;ethics&#39;.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/915746147fe61ed4/723d442979168a9d?show_docid=723d442979168a9d</link>
  <description>
  dear alan, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;i believe that we are ‘together’ but our preference for what words we &lt;br&gt; use differs. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;while i ‘can see the case for’ referring to ‘intuition’ (inclusional &lt;br&gt; understanding) as a form of ‘intellection’, i try to avoid this &lt;br&gt; because, to me, intuition (inclusional understanding) is more like
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/915746147fe61ed4/723d442979168a9d?show_docid=723d442979168a9d</guid>
  <author>
  emili...@goodshare.org
  (emile)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:22:41 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Two different concepts of &#39;balance&#39; in the foundations of &#39;ethics&#39;.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/915746147fe61ed4/695858e1a865a433?show_docid=695858e1a865a433</link>
  <description>
  Dear Ted, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Well, the feeling that this raises in me is that there can be different &lt;br&gt; meanings of &#39;conceptual&#39;, depending on whether the context is rationalistic &lt;br&gt; or inclusional. I think many people, perhaps including Tolle and many who &lt;br&gt; are suspicious if not downright dismissive of intellect, is that they equate
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/915746147fe61ed4/695858e1a865a433?show_docid=695858e1a865a433</guid>
  <author>
  a.d.m.ray...@bath.ac.uk
  (Alan Rayner (BU))
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2008 20:03:16 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Two different concepts of &#39;balance&#39; in the foundations of &#39;ethics&#39;.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/915746147fe61ed4/c57d9bd350a153e1?show_docid=c57d9bd350a153e1</link>
  <description>
  dear alan, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;just to ‘zoom out’ a bit, in an attempt to put a few things into &lt;br&gt; connective perspective, from my point of view.. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;what has always appealed to me is the argument such as that of Eckhart &lt;br&gt; Tolle in ‘A New Earth’ and ‘The Power of Now’, ... though i am &lt;br&gt; troubled when i refer to these works because of their ‘new-agey’
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/915746147fe61ed4/c57d9bd350a153e1?show_docid=c57d9bd350a153e1</guid>
  <author>
  emili...@goodshare.org
  (emile)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2008 18:33:36 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Two different concepts of &#39;balance&#39; in the foundations of &#39;ethics&#39;.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/915746147fe61ed4/beac1d9660f63e54?show_docid=beac1d9660f63e54</link>
  <description>
  Dear Ted, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Yes, I think we are on the same flow-length here, although I prefer the &lt;br&gt; description &#39;limitless space&#39; to &#39;unbounded space&#39;, in view of my interest &lt;br&gt; in &#39;dynamic boundaries&#39; as &#39;dynamic distinctions&#39; (but not definitions) in &lt;br&gt; the &#39;folding&#39; or &#39;dynamic configuration&#39; of space (meaning openness) as
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/915746147fe61ed4/beac1d9660f63e54?show_docid=beac1d9660f63e54</guid>
  <author>
  a.d.m.ray...@bath.ac.uk
  (Alan Rayner (BU))
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2008 09:08:12 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Two different concepts of &#39;balance&#39; in the foundations of &#39;ethics&#39;.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/915746147fe61ed4/2885d540303fed06?show_docid=2885d540303fed06</link>
  <description>
  dear alan, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;yes, the ‘open space geometry’ relative to the ‘closed space geometry’ &lt;br&gt; ‘speaks to me’, but then, i know where you are going with it, &lt;br&gt; already. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;i do see it as a valuable distinction. in my mind, i take ‘open &lt;br&gt; space’ to mean ‘unbounded space’ and then my mind goes to the fact
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/915746147fe61ed4/2885d540303fed06?show_docid=2885d540303fed06</guid>
  <author>
  emili...@goodshare.org
  (emile)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2008 08:21:39 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Two different concepts of &#39;balance&#39; in the foundations of &#39;ethics&#39;.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/915746147fe61ed4/6761ea25c5573827?show_docid=6761ea25c5573827</link>
  <description>
  Dear Ted, &lt;br&gt; Your letter today has coincided with a lot of thinking I have been doing in &lt;br&gt; regard to the inability of people I have been in recent &lt;br&gt; correspondence/discussion with, &#39;to see the point of the non-locality of &lt;br&gt; space&#39;, that is, to get past the &#39;yin-yang&#39;, &#39;space-matter&#39;, &lt;br&gt; &#39;landscape-river&#39; reciprocal correspondence within a localized &#39;whole&#39;, to
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/915746147fe61ed4/6761ea25c5573827?show_docid=6761ea25c5573827</guid>
  <author>
  a.d.m.ray...@bath.ac.uk
  (Alan Rayner (BU))
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2008 19:19:35 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Two different concepts of &#39;balance&#39; in the foundations of &#39;ethics&#39;.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/915746147fe61ed4/b13193db2d9c0967?show_docid=b13193db2d9c0967</link>
  <description>
  a re-worked version of this essay is now at &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.goodshare.org/balance.htm&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/915746147fe61ed4/b13193db2d9c0967?show_docid=b13193db2d9c0967</guid>
  <author>
  emili...@goodshare.org
  (emile)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2008 19:08:08 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Two different concepts of &#39;balance&#39; in the foundations of &#39;ethics&#39;.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/915746147fe61ed4/861ce8ddda386aee?show_docid=861ce8ddda386aee</link>
  <description>
  Two different concepts of ‘balance’ in the foundations of ‘ethics’. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;(for possible interest and discussion) &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Our concept of ‘balance’ plays a foundational role in our individual &lt;br&gt; and collective social behaviour, and there is not one but two popular &lt;br&gt; understandings of ‘the achieving and sustaining of balance’.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/915746147fe61ed4/861ce8ddda386aee?show_docid=861ce8ddda386aee</guid>
  <author>
  emili...@goodshare.org
  (emile)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2008 21:26:59 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Duped!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/a2bd66829688e01d/f2e7bfca747ba06b?show_docid=f2e7bfca747ba06b</link>
  <description>
  Re &#39;duping&#39;, ... It seems to me, that, ..... ‘being duped’ derives &lt;br&gt; from our most popular western way of organising ourselves, which has &lt;br&gt; often been called ‘fascism’ in its most overtly political social &lt;br&gt; incarnation. Someone ‘produces some rhetoric’ or scholarship or &lt;br&gt; (political) science and ‘rides the crest of a new wave’. What gives
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/inclusional-research/browse_thread/thread/a2bd66829688e01d/f2e7bfca747ba06b?show_docid=f2e7bfca747ba06b</guid>
  <author>
  emili...@goodshare.org
  (emile)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2008 00:13:51 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
