From: Nicolas Papaconstantinou <popac...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 03:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues 19 May 2009 11:01
Subject: Re: We Are In The Gutters
Thank you for taking a look at it!
I quite enjoyed the "V" adaptation, but I had some odd criteria for
There's one extremely Moore-esque sequence in the film that raises it
Moore's main argument against a "Watchmen" movie were more about the
Mind, I loved it. There are explosions! & the one piece of invention/
Miller or Millar? This has been a source of confusion in recent days!
When he makes movies, they tend to be a lot more fidgetty plot-wise,
God, I'm pompous!
On 18 May, 10:30, "Cross,Carl \(Cultural & Community Services\)"
<Carl.Cr...@Derbyshire.gov.uk> wrote:
> I did enjoy thanks very much, not least because I'd not seen the snazzy presentation software before and I since I am mainly writing this as a displacement activity to avoid writing my own presentation (to be delivered in two weeks time!) timely. > I take your general points about Moore/Millar films although I for one really liked the V adaptation and [whisper it] prefer the ending to the comic's which is pretty weak and clichéd.
> Does this mean that Millar is writing comics as film treatments in the same way that Michael Crichton used to be accused of doing with his later novels?
> Watchmen was prodigiously faithful to its source material to the point where I think even Mr.Moore might quite like it. Not that he's ever going to see it , obviously. Not on a DVD player in London or elsewhere. And according to the DVD extras of the Black Freighter (yes I am that sad) will get even more verbatim with the release of a directors cut with the Behind the Hood and Black Freighter segments inserted at the correct times.
> I think it made a great film for fans. I think it made a fairly incomprehensible film for non-fans though.
> But then again what do I know? I don't think the new Star Trek movie is up to much and I so wanted to like it. [that should get at least one reply from a member of this list if his Twitter feed is any indication].
> Thanks again for making this available for everyone,
> Carl.
> -----Original Message-----
> Been largely absent from here since starting my new job - I still get
> However, I was recently asked by an old colleague at Southampton City
> Here, for your perusal, but without the added context of me being
> (Borrowed heavily from McCloud, have since heard that Moore said
> Enjoy!
> *************************************************************************** ***
> You can find out more about us by visiting 'www.derbyshire.gov.uk'. If you want to work for us go to our job pages on 'www.derbyshire.gov.uk/jobs'. You can register for e-mail alerts, download job packs and apply on-line.
> *************************************************************************** ***
> This email is confidential, may be legally privileged and may contain personal views that are not the views of Derbyshire County Council. It is intended solely for the addressee. If this email was sent to you in error please notify us by replying to the email. Once you have done this please delete the email and do not disclose, copy, distribute, or rely on it.
> Under the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Freedom of Information Act 2000 the contents of this email may be disclosed.
> Derbyshire County Council reserves the right to monitor both sent and received emails.
> *************************************************************************** ***
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||