|
|
doctrine-dev |
Possibility #1 is the most expressive and easiest to read, IMO. I like the > Hi guys,
> We're talking a lot about Doctrine 2.0 and this time I'm coming here
> Basically the purpose of this email is about WHERE conditions.
> If you have any other suggestions, include them here too.
> So, what's your ideas?
> Cheers,
> --
variant, even though it's more verbose, because it feels a little more
flexible.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: doctrine-dev@googlegroups.com [mailto:doctrine-
> dev@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Guilherme Blanco
> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 1:55 PM
> To: doctrine-dev@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [doctrine-dev] New DQL Criteria API
> to talk about DQL changes.
> String processing is something really weird, and we want to remove,
> since it's extremely error-prone.
> We end up with a lot of possibilities, and we want all of you to give
> us suggestions about which way we should move to.
> Here are the possibilities we came so far:
> http://pastebin.com/f4f6c2aa0
> We expect to find the simplest way to build a query without adding too
> much WTF factor inside.
> Guilherme Blanco - Web Developer
> CBC - Certified Bindows Consultant
> Cell Phone: +55 (16) 9215-8480
> MSN: guilhermebla...@hotmail.com
> URL: http://blog.bisna.com
> São Paulo - SP/Brazil