> As a practical matter, you can always define custom accessors/mutators for
> just those fields. That's probably not what you're looking for, though.

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: doctrine-dev@googlegroups.com [mailto:doctrine-
> > dev@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of eXtreme
> > Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 3:28 PM
> > To: doctrine-dev
> > Subject: [doctrine-dev] 1.2 - resolving the conflict between auto
> > accessors and Doctrine_Record's methods

> > Doctrine supports a cool feature called "auto accessor override".
> > AFAIR this feature wasn't planned before 1.0, that's why there is a
> > "small" problem now in 1.0 and 1.1, which is possible to be
> > (partially?) fixed in new 1.2 branch (I hope so).

> > I'm talking about get* and set* functions in Doctrine_Record and
> > Doctrine_Record_Abstract. They reserve some names, which cannot be
> > used as model's fieldnames, because everything goes crazy - they
> > conflict with magic and custom get* and set* function of auto
> > accessors. I heard many complains >>why does doctrine crash when I add
> > "data" field in my model<< (for example for session storage). And
> > there is no info anywhere, that it is impossible to have "data",
> > "last" or "last_modified" fields in doctrine with auto accessors or in
> > symfony.

> > I'm aware that renaming all get* and set* is a big backward
> > compatibility breaker, so I won't dare to propose that. :P Is there
> > any other way to resolve that conflict?