Message from discussion
What are people's thoughts on the Wheelie Bins that have arrived in Copster Green?
Received: by 10.11.53.59 with SMTP id b59mr1550873cwa;
Mon, 06 Mar 2006 00:43:59 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <k...@copstergreen.co.uk>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188])
by mx.googlegroups.com with ESMTP id v23si1234490cwb.2006.03.06.00.43.58;
Mon, 06 Mar 2006 00:43:59 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (googlegroups.com: 212.227.126.188 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of k...@copstergreen.co.uk)
Received: from [82.68.203.123] (helo=D611FX1J)
by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu4) with ESMTP (Nemesis),
id 0ML21M-1FGBJs3FKv-0002Ea; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 09:43:57 +0100
Message-ID: <003501c640fa$11a649b0$0ac50319@D611FX1J>
From: "Kate Thorp" <k...@copstergreen.co.uk>
To: <Copster-Green@googlegroups.com>
References: <1141309467.119868.315480@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: What are people's thoughts on the Wheelie Bins that have arrived in Copster Green?
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 08:43:40 -0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de ab...@kundenserver.de login:0971bd9c6d73cb4ea53b33a50991fe62
Do you me Bridle Path? It is for horses not brides
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stuart" <sjing...@gmail.com>
To: "Copster Green" <Copster-Green@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 2:24 PM
Subject: What are people's thoughts on the Wheelie Bins that have arrived in
Copster Green?
>
> Here is a link to a newspaper article
> http://www.clitheroetoday.co.uk/ViewArticle2.aspx?SectionID=9&ArticleID=1361649
>
> My personal views are that it is a good idea but and there is always "a
> but" that a few of us do not have direct access to the rear of our
> properties (Terraced) and i have 30 ft and step to the bridal path.
>
> I would have preferred to have individual boxes or containers to put
> recyclables in. This would be more cost efficient, as the recyclables
> would not have to be sorted after they have been picked up.
>
>
>
|
