The Wheelie Bins - Copster Green

Message from discussion The Wheelie Bins

Stuart Ingram

More options 8 Mar 2006, 10:58

From: "Stuart Ingram" <sjing...@gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 10:58:02 +0000

Local: Wed 8 Mar 2006 10:58

Subject: Re: The Wheelie Bins

  Reply to author
  |
  Forward | Print | View thread
  | Show original
  | Report this message | Find messages by this author
  

Ok i work in Colne and live on the Green. On my way to work i see that
the people in Colne putting out one "Box" for cans and bottles a bag
for news papers and bag for green waster and a bag for no recyclables.
These are smaller than the bins we have at the moment and also it
will save money as Ribble Valley will not have to pay to have the
waste sorted. I already recycle all of our house holds waste to the
local tip apart from the unrecyclable stuff.

I will email you later with the location of our bins and thanks for
the offer. Is your offer open to the rest of the green or just
restricted to me? I thought you where at University anyway so are you
going to drive back every Sunday night?

One other good think is that the new bins will stop the bags being
ripped apart by foxes and cats on Sunday night.

I feel we have to do our bit because it is irresponsible not to. I
agree that the Americans should respect and sign up to the Kyoto
agreement.

Stuart

On 07/03/06, rthawo...@aol.com <rthawo...@aol.com> wrote:

> I think its a wheelie good IDEA, but that's about all.

> RE S Ingrams problem of the boxes... blimey i thought 1 bin was
> bordering on overkill, now we have 3 and mr ingraham wants more?
> besides, separating cardboard from metal is not a time consuming
> process. surely moving a bin every week or two isn't going to hurt
> anyone, even if it is thirty yards and *drum roll* a step. if it is
> send me an e mail and ill do it for you.

> However, this whole recycling thing is a bit of a waste of time in
> view of the industrial revolution in China and the ignorance of fat
> Americans who refuse to drive smaller cars or strive to cut carbon
> emissions - we are 'weeing in the wind', if you please.

> Richard.

Reply to author Forward