|
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: comp.unix.programmer
From: Simon Connah <simon.con...@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 03:04:19 +0100
Local: Sat 4 July 2009 03:04
Subject: Re: dlopen() performance on Mac OS X?
On 2009-07-04 02:07:39 +0100, Eric Sosman <esos...@ieee-dot-org.invalid> said:
> So I imagine you're worried about the use of the functions Yes, sorry I should have been more specific. I was using dlopen() as a > residing in the library to which dlopen() gives you access. > There are two (potential) penalties I can think of: First, each > call must be indirect through a function pointer variable rather > than direct to an address known at link time, and second, it may > be that the address-space shenanigans with which a particular > system supports dynamic linking tend to punish MMU's and TLB's > and the like. short hand for describing the whole system rather than just the function call itself. What I was really trying to get at was whether the dlopen / dlsym / Or is it the same implementation just with a developer accessable interface? Hopefully that made a bit more sense. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||