|
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.programmer
From: James Peacock <n...@jip22.freeuk.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 21:26:18 GMT
Local: Thurs 29 Sep 2005 22:26
Subject: Re: 32-bit SharedCLibrary on the A9
Philip Ludlam wrote: You could (and I'm not saying this is a good idea) probably come up with > I've got a bug report from a user using some of my software on an A9. > He comments that the software *RMEnsures SharedCLibrary 5.17 , but he's > In the dim and distant past, the RMEnsure of version 5.17 or later was various RMEnsures on the UtilityModule to work out if you have a 32bit ROL RISC OS and lower the requirement in that case. This sort of stuff should not be necessary. > Now, with the advent of the A9, it seems that RISC OS Developments have I'm in a similar situation, only my software depends on C99 features and > produced their own 32-bit version of the SharedCLibrary. > If one was being particularly bitter one might assume that there's still > a big dispute between ROD and Castle ;-) . I've been informed by users that the Castle SCL is incompatible with the A9 version of RISC OS. The workaround appears to be to use StubsG though in my case, StubsG is no help as old 26bit SCLs don't support C99 :-( > Presumably this version of the SharedCLibrary is going to find it's way We really shouldn't be having these problems with such an important > onto other ROD products (maybe even Select 4!) so I'm going to have to > bite the bullet and ammend the RMEnsure and hope that 5.17 or earlier of > the other SharedCLibrary isn't lurking around anywhere. module... James You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||