<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>comp.sys.acorn.programmer Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer</link>
  <description>Programming of Acorn computers.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Using BASIC from C Applications effciently</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/fe22b6a3c5bb36b6/643ae5764052e432?show_docid=643ae5764052e432</link>
  <description>
  How good to hear from you. I could never have worked out how it could be &lt;br&gt; implemented, but your split memory method had crossed my mind. However, &lt;br&gt; I thought you might run the BASIC program as the primary calling the C &lt;br&gt; code, which would drop back into BASIC when a driver was needed. &lt;br&gt; Communication would be via a memory block. Could that work?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/fe22b6a3c5bb36b6/643ae5764052e432?show_docid=643ae5764052e432</guid>
  <author>
  st...@kappa.me.uk
  (Steve Drain)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 10:40:58 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Learning ARM assembler...</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/7f02b9e667ce6b92/987b395d7a8877c4?show_docid=987b395d7a8877c4</link>
  <description>
  On 23 Nov 2009 02:48:25 +0000 (GMT) &lt;br&gt; GCC on ARM is woefully awful, and IME the maintainers have no interest &lt;br&gt; in fixing it. It&#39;s actually getting significantly worse as time goes &lt;br&gt; on. I&#39;ve had it calculate things twice (once manually, only to throw &lt;br&gt; the result away and then call an expensive built-in), and completely
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/7f02b9e667ce6b92/987b395d7a8877c4?show_docid=987b395d7a8877c4</guid>
  <author>
  n...@rjek.com
  (Rob Kendrick)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 09:47:27 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Learning ARM assembler...</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/7f02b9e667ce6b92/f1fd95b7c15a7994?show_docid=f1fd95b7c15a7994</link>
  <description>
  Looks handy. Funnily enough I was talking to someone from ARM&#39;s compilers &lt;br&gt; group this week, who said that the push towards netbooks is meaning they&#39;re &lt;br&gt; having to do serious work on their compiler to keep up with all the work &lt;br&gt; that&#39;s happened for x86 compilers. And it looks like some of these &lt;br&gt; improvements will be free (fitted to GCC, I assume). Apparently ARM are
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/7f02b9e667ce6b92/f1fd95b7c15a7994?show_docid=f1fd95b7c15a7994</guid>
  <author>
  theom+n...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
  (Theo Markettos)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 02:48:25 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Using BASIC from C Applications effciently</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/fe22b6a3c5bb36b6/102142e442674027?show_docid=102142e442674027</link>
  <description>
  In article &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;208890ba-2049-4a85-8764-efb8a 1eee...@k4g2000yqb.googlegroup s.com&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; Agreed. The alternative, as I suggested, is to implement the BASIC bit as a &lt;br&gt; simple Wimp task and use Wimp message passing between the C task and it. &lt;br&gt; That way, the Wimp ends up doing (pretty much) all of the work you described.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/fe22b6a3c5bb36b6/102142e442674027?show_docid=102142e442674027</guid>
  <author>
  st...@revi11.plus.com
  (Ste (news))
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2009 17:59:19 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Learning ARM assembler...</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/7f02b9e667ce6b92/d388364c5c8a4aa2?show_docid=d388364c5c8a4aa2</link>
  <description>
  On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:13:05 GMT &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.riscworld.co.uk/volumes/volume1/issue4/armcode/index.htm&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Some snippets: &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;In the ARM the data bus is 32 bits wide hence there are 32 wires so &lt;br&gt; the ARM chip is said to be a 32 bit chip.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;Another effect of the RISC design is low power consumption (hence no &lt;br&gt; heat sinks or fans required!).&amp;quot;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/7f02b9e667ce6b92/d388364c5c8a4aa2?show_docid=d388364c5c8a4aa2</guid>
  <author>
  n...@rjek.com
  (Rob Kendrick)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2009 17:42:54 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Learning ARM assembler...</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/7f02b9e667ce6b92/c38b465cefa3a698?show_docid=c38b465cefa3a698</link>
  <description>
  Would you like to point out the exact section, for those of us with &lt;br&gt; short attention spans? &lt;br&gt; ---druck
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/7f02b9e667ce6b92/c38b465cefa3a698?show_docid=c38b465cefa3a698</guid>
  <author>
  n...@druck.freeuk.com
  (druck)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2009 17:13:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Learning ARM assembler...</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/7f02b9e667ce6b92/ddc2dccdb4c1ffec?show_docid=ddc2dccdb4c1ffec</link>
  <description>
  On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:32:49 GMT &lt;br&gt; Although I gave up reading it half way through the first part, due to &lt;br&gt; its extensive jingoism and/or simple falsehood. &lt;br&gt; Dave Thomas recently published an excellent series on his website, &lt;br&gt; however, including a big section on writing C code that produces good &lt;br&gt; ARM code. Plenty of eye-openers:
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/7f02b9e667ce6b92/ddc2dccdb4c1ffec?show_docid=ddc2dccdb4c1ffec</guid>
  <author>
  n...@rjek.com
  (Rob Kendrick)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2009 15:21:39 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Using BASIC from C Applications effciently</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/fe22b6a3c5bb36b6/c282ea654008f10a?show_docid=c282ea654008f10a</link>
  <description>
  Apologies for a response to such an outdated message, but a friend &lt;br&gt; just mentioned this in conversation and, after explaining how you do &lt;br&gt; this to him, I thought it might be useful to at least reply to the OP. &lt;br&gt; As you (and, I see, others) suggest, the BASIC and C applications do &lt;br&gt; have to exist within the same space and using system() to invoke the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/fe22b6a3c5bb36b6/c282ea654008f10a?show_docid=c282ea654008f10a</guid>
  <author>
  ge...@gerph.org
  (Gerph)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2009 02:29:12 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Learning ARM assembler...</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/7f02b9e667ce6b92/f26c0fc1c0466ed3?show_docid=f26c0fc1c0466ed3</link>
  <description>
  In message &amp;lt;8fc50089-2c5a-4869-9830-a9948 761d...@k17g2000yqb.googlegro &lt;br&gt; ups.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; The above link now contains direct links to the 8 part Risc World ARM &lt;br&gt; Assembler tutorials. &lt;br&gt; Regards
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/7f02b9e667ce6b92/f26c0fc1c0466ed3?show_docid=f26c0fc1c0466ed3</guid>
  <author>
  paulstew...@phawfaux.co.uk
  (Paul Stewart)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2009 20:32:49 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: IfRunning</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/19de31b8ab0e2683/1b34853b69f332a6?show_docid=1b34853b69f332a6</link>
  <description>
  In message &amp;lt;50bc550fa8ne...@Torrens.org.u k&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; Just the job, Richard - many thanks. Works a treat. &lt;br&gt; Now I have an Obey file that starts the LanMan98 Filer iff not &lt;br&gt; already running, then calls Connect98 on my NAS drive. &lt;br&gt; Dave
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/19de31b8ab0e2683/1b34853b69f332a6?show_docid=1b34853b69f332a6</guid>
  <author>
  davehig...@dsl.pipex.com
  (Dave Higton)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:41:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: IfRunning</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/19de31b8ab0e2683/f04dfae3215904b2?show_docid=f04dfae3215904b2</link>
  <description>
  In article &amp;lt;3587c5ba50.davehig...@dsl.pip ex.com&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; The module FilerHRun implements IfTask and IfNTask amongst others. &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.zen22994.zen.co.uk/musus/miscfw.htm&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/19de31b8ab0e2683/f04dfae3215904b2?show_docid=f04dfae3215904b2</guid>
  <author>
  news+14...@torrens.org.uk
  (Richard Torrens (News))
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:05:48 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: IfRunning</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/19de31b8ab0e2683/0a68df1b2e8b3c2e?show_docid=0a68df1b2e8b3c2e</link>
  <description>
  Here&#39;s a not altogether helpful reply ;-) &lt;br&gt; I recall looking at the source of some other *Ifvariant command (possibly &lt;br&gt; IfThere) at some point and seeing that it seemed to work by evaluating the &lt;br&gt; condition then plugging &#39;true&#39; or &#39;false&#39; or 1/0 or something like that into &lt;br&gt; the condition, so the command buffer
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/19de31b8ab0e2683/0a68df1b2e8b3c2e?show_docid=0a68df1b2e8b3c2e</guid>
  <author>
  jn.nntp.scrap...@wingsandbeaks.org.uk
  (Jeremy Nicoll - news posts)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 23:06:11 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: IfRunning</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/19de31b8ab0e2683/ab63dbb1387f989e?show_docid=ab63dbb1387f989e</link>
  <description>
  In message &amp;lt;mpro.kt6x9k00003b500qf.n...@p ittdj.co.uk&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; Ah, that is very clever. The other &amp;quot;which&amp;quot; ports I have seen only &lt;br&gt; perform the core function of finding executables on the path. This one &lt;br&gt; really looks at modules that provide the given command first. Very &lt;br&gt; useful. &lt;br&gt; Martin
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/19de31b8ab0e2683/ab63dbb1387f989e?show_docid=ab63dbb1387f989e</guid>
  <author>
  spamt...@mw-software.com
  (Martin Wuerthner)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 11:25:28 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Looking for Centronics related code</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/63be91a564408415/fae3bc20f008a7ca?show_docid=fae3bc20f008a7ca</link>
  <description>
  Hello David. &lt;br&gt; Would you be ok to make the source code available so that I try to &lt;br&gt; connect to &lt;br&gt; the v6z80p board ? &lt;br&gt; Cheers, &lt;br&gt; Xavier.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/63be91a564408415/fae3bc20f008a7ca?show_docid=fae3bc20f008a7ca</guid>
  <author>
  xlta...@gmail.com
  (Xavier)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 10:15:50 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: IfRunning</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/19de31b8ab0e2683/ce4b66267c847489?show_docid=ce4b66267c847489</link>
  <description>
  The Dawsun ifrunning is 26bit which did not work here on OS4.04, stopped by &lt;br&gt; a &#39;Window Manager in use&#39; error. &lt;br&gt; *which is a utility to find the source of * commands :- &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.duncan.moore.freeuk.com/riscos/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; No.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.sys.acorn.programmer/browse_thread/thread/19de31b8ab0e2683/ce4b66267c847489?show_docid=ce4b66267c847489</guid>
  <author>
  n...@pittdj.co.uk
  (David Pitt)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 07:10:32 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
