trying to login - can't.

anyone know why?

OK on PC

:o((

--
Chris de Cordova

If you think nobody cares about you, try missing a couple of payments.

In message of 7 Sep, Chris de Cordova <decord...@ukgateway.net> wrote:

Works OK here on NetSurf dev of 4 Aug 2008.

But something may be doing you a favour as, until I turned off all
e-mail communications, Genes Reunited were sending me trunker loads of
rubbish mail.  They sounded absolutely desparate for paying customers.

--
Tim Powys-Lybbe                                          t...@powys.org
             For a miscellany of bygones: http://powys.org/

Who knows, you supplied almost no relevant information.  In particular:

- The URL to "genesreunited", which presumably is a website.
- What "OK on PC" means.  i.e, which browser and OS.
- What "can't" means.  Presumably some unnamed browser on RISC OS, and
you don't say what happened when you tried.
- Version of RISC OS for good measure.
- For even better measure, a meaningful topic, and a more appropriate
group, probably .apps or .networking.

All good bug reporting measures, of course.

In message of 7 Sep, Peter Naulls <pe...@chocky.org> wrote:

So he needed an expert to help him.

At least I am expert enough here to know what he was talking about.
Though my view is that he is wasting his time, but then I may be biased
from sad experience of the firm.

--
Tim Powys-Lybbe                                          t...@powys.org
             For a miscellany of bygones: http://powys.org/

In article <834032db4f....@south-frm.demon.co.uk>,
   Tim Powys-Lybbe <t...@powys.org> wrote:

Or 'she' perhaps?

John

--
John Williams, Brittany, Northern France - no attachments to these addresses!
Non-RISC OS posters change user to johnrwilliams or put 'risc' in subject
for reliable contact! Who is John Williams? http://www.picindex.info/author/
Somewhere nice to stay in Brittany? http://petit.four.free.fr/visitors/locate

She, I believe, but I'm unsure what your point is.  Getting an answer
to a problem requires at least some very basic due diligence
on the part of the person reporting a problem.  Otherwise there's
very little the "expert" can do without guessing - and that's a waste
of everyone's time.

I'm of course referring to effective bug reporting guidelines, which
have been posted here plenty of times.  The worst bug reporting
that you can give a developer is "it doesn't work".

In article <4fdb33eae0UCE...@tiscali.co.uk>, John Williams

Not perhaps, definitely!

--
Russell
http://www.russell-hafter-holidays.co.uk
Russell Hafter Holidays         E-mail to enquiries at our domain
Holiday specialists for Germany, Alsace, Austria, Belgium, Luxembourg, Czech Republic

In article <4fdb3dbe3aSpam...@argonet.co.uk>,
   Stuart <Spam...@argonet.co.uk> wrote:

Me too - I was being polite!

John

--
John Williams, Brittany, Northern France - no attachments to these addresses!
Non-RISC OS posters change user to johnrwilliams or put 'risc' in subject
for reliable contact! Who is John Williams? http://www.picindex.info/author/
Somewhere nice to stay in Brittany? http://petit.four.free.fr/visitors/locate

In article <80812edb4f....@south-frm.demon.co.uk>,
   Tim Powys-Lybbe <t...@powys.org> wrote:

just me, then

I can get the home page ok but when I enter my details the boxes
empty and I am not logged in.

I wondered if it might be a cookies thing but have no idea how to
enable these ... or perhaps just a RO thing.

Oregano 1, RO 3.7

--
Chris de Cordova

A grenade thrown into a French kitchen would result in Linoleum Blownapart.

In article <ga12nn$rn...@aioe.org>,
   Peter Naulls <pe...@chocky.org> wrote:

[Snip]

please killfile me

--
Chris de Cordova

Monday is an awful way to spend 1/7th of your life.

In message of 7 Sep, Peter Naulls <pe...@chocky.org> wrote:

My point is quite simple: a person with appropriate expertise can
sometimes see fairly accurately what is being said.  So there is no need
to go for any fault reporting interrogation.

Similarly I would expect that for some Unix problems you could very
quickly pick up what they were saying whereas I, who have no Unix
expertise, would have no idea.

Politely, you did not know enough to work out what the problem was.  So
you would have been better keeping quiet?

<ducks and puts on flame protection suit>

--
Tim Powys-Lybbe                                          t...@powys.org
             For a miscellany of bygones: http://powys.org/

This is exactly the point.  No one knew enough to work about what
the problem was, unless they wanted to perform a considerable
degree of speculation.  Again, this is a waste of everyone's
time.  So we could easily say that _you_ would have been
better keeping quiet.