|
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.hardware
From: "Dave Plowman (News)" <d...@davenoise.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:16:55 +0100
Local: Thurs 9 July 2009 11:16
Subject: Re: Unipod question
In article <slrnh4mu93.4r9.use...@greedy.zen175545>,
Ollie Clark <use...@ollieclark.com> wrote: > Dave Plowman (News) wrote: I've rearranged things with one HD as master and one CD as slave on the > > I have two HDs and two CDs - one a writer. Does it matter how they are > > arranged on the Unipod? Ie both HDs on one circuit or share each with a > > CD? And which should be master or slave? > AIUI and IIRC, you should try to have devices that you're going to be > copying data between on different channels (primary or secondary). So, > if you write a lot of CDs from one HD to your writer, have the HD on > primary and the writer on secondary. > Other than that, I don't think it matters much. I tend to have HDs as > master and optical drives as slave if I've got both on one channel. Unipod primary, one HD as master on the Unipod secondary, and the other CD as master on the internal IDE buss. Now get an error message saying no soft loaded driver for this CD - and the machine hangs at boot. -- Dave Plowman d...@davenoise.co.uk London SW You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||