Message from discussion
StrongArm processor
Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!cyclone03.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!npeersf01.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe30.ams2.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail
From: Greg <g...@home.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.hardware
Subject: Re: StrongArm processor
Message-ID: <MPG.24af5b8cd74f511f989687@news.demon.co.uk>
References: <5071a9870eajg@argonet.co.uk>
Organization: Home
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.60.2060
Lines: 14
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.177.172.46
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
X-Trace: newsfe30.ams2 1246055020 80.177.172.46 (Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:23:40 UTC)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:23:40 UTC
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:26:57 +0100
In article <5071a9870e...@argonet.co.uk>, a...@argonet.co.uk says...
[snip]
> Can anyone confirm that this is what happened, or were we given a new
> processor with 4.02?
No.
> Do I have to upgrade to 4.02 in order not to have this limit?
Yes.
--
Greg Harris