Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion Future of Risc OS
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Nigel Willmott  
View profile
 More options 26 Mar 2007, 11:56
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.apps
From: Nigel Willmott <nwillm...@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:56:47 GMT
Local: Mon 26 Mar 2007 11:56
Subject: Re: Future of Risc OS
In message <Acc*zy...@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
          Theo Markettos <theom+n...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:

> Steve Potts <nos...@all.invaliid> wrote:
>> In message <Hfu*N0...@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
>>          Theo Markettos <theom+n...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
>>> http://www.riscos.info/index.php/MassFS_OtherDevs_entries

>> Thanks for pointing that one out.  I've now done my bit and added the
>> entries which were previously only available from my web site.

> Thanks.  Now the pages have a bit more content I've linked them in from
> http://www.riscos.info/ so they should be a bit more visible now.

> Theo

I've had my say and don't particularly want to pick up on specific
points of detail. But a couple of additonal comments.

It has been an interesting discussion, but very much on a general
level. I was hoping to get a bit more down and dirty: I suppose what I
was saying at its crudest was, are there any RO developers out there
for hire and interested in doing some of the things users most want
(most notably a new build of FF2 with additional functionality!) ...
Perhaps not any more - or perhaps they don't believe it is possible
put together a workable project with user support.

But picking up from what Theo has said about using the Wiki - is it
possible to extend that to development, so that for instance
developers could put up what their current projects are and what they
might be interested in ... and users could (hopefully sensibly)
register their willingness to support development in financial or
other terms. Maybe more communication via a central clearing house
like that could foster some worthwhile collaborations and help speed
up some developments.

Just a thought.

Nigel


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google