Message from discussion
Latest news from VirtualAcorn
Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!feed.xsnews.nl!border-2.ams.xsnews.nl!216.196.110.149.MISMATCH!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-in.ntli.net!newsrout1-win.ntli.net!ntli.net!news.highwinds-media.com!newspeer1-win.ntli.net!newsfe3-win.ntli.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: Gary Locock <garyn...@locock.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Latest news from VirtualAcorn
Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.apps
Message-ID: <4ec0903b47garynews@locock.co.uk>
References: <ap.244ee54eb9.a701a0a.m.conroy@argonet.co.uk> <5f7d67c04e.jess@itworkshop.invalid> <398b6ec04e.Jeremy@pressxpress.co.uk>
User-Agent: Pluto/3.04c (RISC-OS/5.11) NewsHound/1.43-32-pre2
Organization: None
Lines: 74
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:24:32 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.20.34.194
X-Complaints-To: http://www.ntlworld.com/netreport
X-Trace: newsfe3-win.ntli.net 1173392672 86.20.34.194 (Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:24:32 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:24:32 GMT
In article <398b6ec04e.Jer...@pressxpress.co.uk>,
Jeremy Brayshaw <jer...@brayshaw.org.uk> wrote:
> In message <5f7d67c04e.j...@itworkshop.invalid>
> Jess Hampshire <j...@itworkshop-nexus.net> wrote:
> > In message <ap.244ee54eb9.a701a0a.m.con...@argonet.co.uk>
> > <ATimbr...@aol.com> wrote:
> >
> >> VirtualAcorn extends support to include Windows Vista
> >
> > Is the OS X version ever going to be released? If so is there a
> > timescale?
> This is only my opinion, but it seems to me that RO developers seem to
> target Windows users because of the sheer size of the userbase. I
> think Ovation Pro has proved this is neither an advantage nor an easy
> market to move in to. I suspect that Mac users are a far more willing
> market, simply because they have the intelligence to choose the OS
> they use based on features, and not on the 'everyone uses it so it
> must be good' philosophy.
> I also suspect that, if they are free to choose, most RO users will
> move to MacOS rather than Windows for the same reason.
Entirely agree, and with the benefit of hindsight, so might David Pilling.
But it /is/ hindsight, because prior to the most recent versions the Mac had
a funny filesystem, and interworking with other computer systems (not only
RISC OS) was a bit iffy by reputation, and it put people off.
[Snip]
> It's strange, and quite frustrating, to have some RO products on
> Windows and not on Mac. Mac is a smaller market but with a bigger
> willing customer base for such things.
> So my plea to all active RO software authors is to consider the
> motives of people buying a Mac, against those buying a Windows system.
> Financially, it must be a better bet as most Mac users don't have cost
> as the major reason for buying.
Again, entirely agree, though Macs are no longer astronomically priced,
particularly if you can qualify for education pricing (got a student in the
family??). The Mac market is rather like the Acorn market was back in the
glory days; a lot of help and enthusiasm around. But the upswing has been
/very/ recent; OS X with its rock-solid Unix foundation... the iPod effect...
and now Intel for the much-needed speed boost. Nobody could have forecast
all this, even 3 years ago.
> So, to my mind, both Aaron and Paul (VA and OPro) are missing huge
> opportunities with their work by ignoring MacOS, and our loved RISC OS
> suffers for it.
(Paul??)
VA isn't /ignoring/ Mac OS AFAIK; they bring a demonstrator version of VA on
Mac OS to most shows these days (though like you, I am impatient for the
finished product).
There is a downside of course, for RO developers. Mac OS X is really rather
good, especially where RO is weakest, on the internet. Two first-rate free
browsers, and no virus worries. Don't want to encourage desertion, do we--?
However with all its strengths, the Mac still doesn't have a DTP app as nice
to use as OvnPro, AFAICS.
Gary
--
Gary Locock, Network Manager, Bablake Junior School
Coundon Road, Coventry CV1 4AU
School Website: http://www.bablakejs.co.uk
Private mail: g a r y (at) l o c o c k . c o . u k