Or vice versa. It seems to me that ROS Ltd has more to gain from co-operating with Castle as a select version would produce income for ROS from existing Iyonix users and licensing fees from Castle if they were to use it in new machines which they might be under pressure to do from buyers.
In article <1164798441.476451.113...@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, Aaron
<atimbr...@aol.com> wrote: > On Nov 28, 9:41#pm, druck <n...@druck.freeuk.com> wrote: > > Seems that went the same way as co-operating with Castle to merge the OS > > branches. > I'm still waiting for you to post the comment I apparently made on > Drobe...or is it yet another example of pure Druck fiction?
I'm still waiting for Druck to apologise as he promised on Drobe last month.
-- John Cartmell j...@finnybank.com 0845 006 8822 or 0161 969 9820 Qercus magazine FAX +44 (0)8700-519-527 www.finnybank.com Qercus - the best guide to RISC OS computing
<alan.da...@argonet.co.uk> wrote: > In article <76010d8d4e.dr...@druck.freeuk.net>, druck > <n...@druck.freeuk.com> wrote: > > On 28 Nov 2006 Kevin Wells <kevinwe...@talktalk.net> wrote: > > > RISC OS Ltd new name according to this report from drobe:
> > ---druck > Or vice versa. It seems to me that ROS Ltd has more to gain from > co-operating with Castle as a select version would produce income for > ROS from existing Iyonix users and licensing fees from Castle if they > were to use it in new machines which they might be under pressure to do > from buyers.
Not to mention unified marketing and development efforts. No, wait, what am I saying....
-- * Cheap phone bills? Gift shopping? www.timil.com/usenet.php * Spam-proof Usenet address? Visit www.invalid.org.uk or email me: postmaster at invalid dot org dot uk * (t...@invalid.org.uk is deleted unread - please use my valid address above)
... "Women may fall when there's no strength in men" Rom & Jul, Act ii, Sc.3
|
