<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp</id>
  <title type="text">comp.protocols.time.ntp Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  The network time protocol.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="comp.protocols.time.ntp feed"/>
  <updated>2009-12-10T09:09:20Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.co.uk" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Roger</name>
  <email>inva...@invalid.invalid</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-10T09:09:20Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/40fa7ba8fd4f1ba9/79682783a8abbc27?show_docid=79682783a8abbc27</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/40fa7ba8fd4f1ba9/79682783a8abbc27?show_docid=79682783a8abbc27"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Unable to run Meinberg versions &quot;copenhagen&quot; or &quot;lennon&quot;</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:43:42 -0800, E-Mail Sent to this address &lt;br&gt; will be added to the BlackLists &lt;br&gt; I started using NTP on this computer at version 4.2.4p4 &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;modena&amp;quot;. p4, p5 and both p6 versions run okay. I am running p6 &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;vegas-v2&amp;quot; at the moment because neither p7 nor p8 will run. &lt;br&gt; If w32time is what is shown as &amp;quot;Windows Time&amp;quot; under
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists</name>
  <email>n...@blacklist.anitech-systems.invalid</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-09T21:43:42Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/40fa7ba8fd4f1ba9/02b350a0399ffd40?show_docid=02b350a0399ffd40</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/40fa7ba8fd4f1ba9/02b350a0399ffd40?show_docid=02b350a0399ffd40"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Unable to run Meinberg versions &quot;copenhagen&quot; or &quot;lennon&quot;</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Sounds like either NTP is not running with sufficient rights, &lt;br&gt; or w32time did not get disabled. &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.meinberg.de/english/sw/readme-ntpinstaller.htm#accessrights&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; NTP should be one of the users under &lt;br&gt; HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Mi crosoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\ProfileList &lt;br&gt; You can also check to see if the NTP account is hidden
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Roger</name>
  <email>inva...@invalid.invalid</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-09T20:36:33Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/40fa7ba8fd4f1ba9/0d109df41dd80019?show_docid=0d109df41dd80019</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/40fa7ba8fd4f1ba9/0d109df41dd80019?show_docid=0d109df41dd80019"/>
  <title type="text">Unable to run Meinberg versions &quot;copenhagen&quot; or &quot;lennon&quot;</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I tried to install and run &amp;quot;lennon&amp;quot; today. It didn&#39;t work so I &lt;br&gt; did a restore and then found that I had been running &amp;quot;vegas&amp;quot;. &lt;br&gt; (I&#39;d forgotten that &amp;quot;copenhagen&amp;quot; wouldn&#39;t run.) &lt;br&gt; The messages in Event Properties of Event Viewer / Application &lt;br&gt; are: &lt;br&gt; ntpd 4.2.4p8@lennon-o Dec 09 14:38:09 (UTC+01:00) 2009 (1)
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>NTP Public Services Project</name>
  <email>webmas...@ntp.org</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-09T16:58:13Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/b6bcff15f8863051/51541d14016fccfa?show_docid=51541d14016fccfa</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/b6bcff15f8863051/51541d14016fccfa?show_docid=51541d14016fccfa"/>
  <title type="text">NTP 4.2.6-RC Released</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Redwood City, CA - 2009/12/09 - The NTP Public Services Project &lt;br&gt; (&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://support.ntp.org/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;) is pleased to announce that NTP 4.2.6-RC, &lt;br&gt; a Release Candidate of the NTP Reference Implementation from the &lt;br&gt; NTP Project, is now available at &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.ntp.org/downloads.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://support.ntp.org/download&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>David J Taylor</name>
  <email>david-tay...@blueyonder.delete-this-bit.and-this-part.co.uk.invalid</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-09T16:32:06Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/7a6dd1c75b26aeb1/0e03b4faa985d1e3?show_docid=0e03b4faa985d1e3</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/7a6dd1c75b26aeb1/0e03b4faa985d1e3?show_docid=0e03b4faa985d1e3"/>
  <title type="text">Re: One last release candidate (in name only) and a new -stable</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  [] &lt;br&gt; [] &lt;br&gt; Thanks for that, Dave. Those binaries are running apparently correctly on &lt;br&gt; the five PCs where I&#39;ve loaded them - Windows 2000 Server, Windows XP and &lt;br&gt; Windows-7 with GPS/PPS, Windows XP and Windows Vista with LAN sync. &lt;br&gt; Cheers, &lt;br&gt; David
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Martin Burnicki</name>
  <email>martin.burni...@meinberg.de</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-09T16:15:36Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/9b4aa34b21d81dda/ae647aa83880eefe?show_docid=ae647aa83880eefe</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/9b4aa34b21d81dda/ae647aa83880eefe?show_docid=ae647aa83880eefe"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Win2k3 Server as NTP server?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  We are running ntpd on a Win 2003 server without problems. However, that is &lt;br&gt; a standalone server and not a member of an Active Directory domain. &lt;br&gt; Except what I&#39;ve written earlier regarding potential problems in an AD &lt;br&gt; domain, an additional problem can be the limited resolution of the Windows &lt;br&gt; system time (i.e. about 16 ms timer ticks).
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Heiko Gerstung</name>
  <email>heiko.removethistext.gerst...@meinberg.de</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-09T14:52:40Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/58f191c5abd79f91/73664d9fac32932e?show_docid=73664d9fac32932e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/58f191c5abd79f91/73664d9fac32932e?show_docid=73664d9fac32932e"/>
  <title type="text">Critical Security Update for NTP Installer for Windows (4.2.4p8@lennon)</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  *Software: New NTP Version for Windows (4.2.4p8@lennon) - Security Update* &lt;br&gt; Bad Pyrmont, 2009-12-09 &lt;br&gt; Yesterday the NTP Public Services Project announced the availability of &lt;br&gt; a security update for their stable NTP version 4.2.4p7. Based on the new &lt;br&gt; point release 4.2.4p8 Meinberg Radio Clocks updated their NTP Installer
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Jan Ceuleers</name>
  <email>janspam.ceule...@skynet.be</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-09T13:31:27Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/7a6dd1c75b26aeb1/84a977a3541cf1e1?show_docid=84a977a3541cf1e1</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/7a6dd1c75b26aeb1/84a977a3541cf1e1?show_docid=84a977a3541cf1e1"/>
  <title type="text">Re: One last release candidate (in name only) and a new -stable</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Thanks to Robin and Dmitri for finding and reporting the problem!
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Dave Hart</name>
  <email>daveh...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-09T13:27:54Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/7a6dd1c75b26aeb1/eafd4ce0909ea5aa?show_docid=eafd4ce0909ea5aa</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/7a6dd1c75b26aeb1/eafd4ce0909ea5aa?show_docid=eafd4ce0909ea5aa"/>
  <title type="text">One last release candidate (in name only) and a new -stable</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  There was a hiccup or two along the way, but in essence we have a new - &lt;br&gt; stable release, 4.2.6, and will soon see the first 4.2.7 -dev &lt;br&gt; release. If you look at the distribution points right now, there is a &lt;br&gt; ntp-4.2.6-RC.tar.gz. I expect within a day there will also be a &lt;br&gt; ntp-4.2.6.tar.gz, differing only in the version&#39;s -RC suffix (which is
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>David J Taylor</name>
  <email>david-tay...@blueyonder.not-this-bit.nor-this-part.co.uk.invalid</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-08T20:23:32Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/87f47777c733d2ea/d4ab3b2d7e101cf0?show_docid=d4ab3b2d7e101cf0</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/87f47777c733d2ea/d4ab3b2d7e101cf0?show_docid=d4ab3b2d7e101cf0"/>
  <title type="text">Originate Timestamp returned as zero</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Under what circumstances might an originate timestamp be returned as zero &lt;br&gt; from an NTP4 server? Is it something wrong I put in the outgoing packet? &lt;br&gt; Thanks, &lt;br&gt; David
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>shane-dated-2...@csy.ca</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-08T17:48:39Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/8c9c90703ee6742e/deb111b7da196aef?show_docid=deb111b7da196aef</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/8c9c90703ee6742e/deb111b7da196aef?show_docid=deb111b7da196aef"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Which Linux kernels have PPS support</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; Yes and no. PPS core is in but you still need a patch for the serial &lt;br&gt; support. Rather than using the oldest kernel with PPS, why not use the &lt;br&gt; newest (2.6.32) with this patch. &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://ftp.enneenne.com/pub/misc/linuxpps/patches/tests/ntp-pps-v2.6.32-rc8.diff&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Shane
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>NTP Public Services Project</name>
  <email>webmas...@ntp.org</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-08T16:33:27Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/3d2dcfc05a77342a/25d653415a2cf507?show_docid=25d653415a2cf507</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/3d2dcfc05a77342a/25d653415a2cf507?show_docid=25d653415a2cf507"/>
  <title type="text">NTP 4.2.4p8 Released</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Redwood City, CA - 2009/12/08 - The NTP Public Services Project &lt;br&gt; (&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://support.ntp.org/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;) is pleased to announce that NTP 4.2.4p8, &lt;br&gt; a Point Release of the NTP Reference Implementation from the &lt;br&gt; NTP Project, is now available at &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.ntp.org/downloads.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://support.ntp.org/download&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt; File-size: 3389646 bytes
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Steve Kostecke</name>
  <email>koste...@ntp.org</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-08T15:16:19Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/8c9c90703ee6742e/a369029e4887b1af?show_docid=a369029e4887b1af</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/8c9c90703ee6742e/a369029e4887b1af?show_docid=a369029e4887b1af"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Which Linux kernels have PPS support</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.31&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Rob van der Putten</name>
  <email>r...@sput.nl</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-08T12:33:45Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/8c9c90703ee6742e/7b67dd869737cdc5?show_docid=7b67dd869737cdc5</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/8c9c90703ee6742e/7b67dd869737cdc5?show_docid=7b67dd869737cdc5"/>
  <title type="text">Which Linux kernels have PPS support</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi there &lt;br&gt; I read that kernel PPS support is now part of vanilla kernels (no patch &lt;br&gt; required). Since when? Which is the oldest kernel with PPS support? &lt;br&gt; Regards, &lt;br&gt; Rob
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Tim Shoppa</name>
  <email>sho...@trailing-edge.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-12-07T17:01:45Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/b2e0a1959d6b5371/7f19e6c5c4782c8b?show_docid=7f19e6c5c4782c8b</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.protocols.time.ntp/browse_frm/thread/b2e0a1959d6b5371/7f19e6c5c4782c8b?show_docid=7f19e6c5c4782c8b"/>
  <title type="text">Re: CHU gadget box files</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Some folks like to tinker with (and I have myself done so) a PPS &lt;br&gt; source from one refclock, and a serial stream from a second refclock &lt;br&gt; under development, as this lets you get a handle on latency etc. This &lt;br&gt; is how I measured the audio driver latency and jitter using different &lt;br&gt; tweaks. I think this is a fine cross check.
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
