Microsoft's Scott Guthrie Lies About/Twists "Cross-platform" to Hijack Web
flag
Messages 91 - 100 of 197 - Collapse all
/groups/adfetch?adid=RsTMyBIAAABWcDhBVf93Z3UHqDFNkDUcHOOf3QyR6bPzxOY7iJ1W1A
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Follow-up To:
Add Cc | Add Follow-up to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers that you hear
 
91.  [H]omer  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 2 Mar 2008, 18:58
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
From: "[H]omer" <s...@uce.gov>
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 18:58:08 +0000
Local: Sun 2 Mar 2008 18:58
Subject: Re: Microsoft's Scott Guthrie Lies About/Twists "Cross-platform" to Hijack Web

Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> Microsoft in this case is doing the right thing: they are assisting
> the Mono group to have an open source implementation that will be
> fully compatible with their implementation

Well well, the big guns are out in full force this weekend, aren't they?

While you're here, please allow me to take this opportunity to ask a few
pertinent (although not entirely impertinent) questions:

1) ... What proportion of Mono uses Microsoft's patented technology,
including that which is is part of the ECMA specifications?

2) ... To what degree do you trust ECMA and the RAND covenant to not
sue, for the use of any Microsoft Intellectual Property?

3) ... To what degree do you Trust Microsoft, either in terms of their
promises; their motivations; or their commitment to a competing platform
like Linux?

> They even took an extra step and will distribute their optimized
> media codecs (as a binary blob) for users.   Those that feel strongly
> about not using binary blobs, can just use FFMPEG (this is what is
> supported by default if you compile from source code anyways).

4) ... Do you foresee a point in the future where access to much of the
Web might be impossible, or at least extraordinarily difficult, without
the use of Silverlight, much like Microsoft tried to do with ActiveX and
other proprietary; encumbered; and non-standard technology during the
Netscape years?

5) ... Do you further forsee the likelihood that the binary blobs, that
you speak of, become a hard dependency in order to fully utilise the
future Web, as it will be reborn in Microsoft's image, given the
possibility that Microsoft may develop new proprietary and encumbered
codecs, or enforce their Intellectual Property rights on Free
implementations of existing codecs, such as those used in FFMPEG?

6) ... Therefore do you concede that it is possible, and indeed likely,
that the future of the Web (and in other contexts - office documents and
software development) might end up becoming utterly dependent of
Microsoft's Intellectual Property, and thus effectively controlled (in
essence "owned") by Microsoft, just as they have been striving to do for
so long, and have currently succeeded in other areas, such as the OEM
channel; games development; hardware support; and elsewhere?

7) ... And finally, do you think it is prudent, or even morally right,
for Free Software developers to essentially help Microsoft in their
endeavours to dominate the Web; office formats; and software
development, particularly as Microsoft has continuously expressed so
much contempt and hatred for the principles of Free Software and Open
Standards over the years?

Thanks in advance for your assistance.

--
K.
http://slated.org

.----
| 'When it comes to knowledge, "ownership" just doesn't make sense'
|     ~ Cory Doctorow, The Guardian.  http://tinyurl.com/22bgx8
`----

Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) on sky, running kernel 2.6.23.8-63.fc8
 18:57:41 up 72 days, 16:33,  5 users,  load average: 0.01, 0.04, 0.00


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
92.  Miguel de Icaza  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 3 Mar 2008, 16:07
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel.de.ic...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 08:07:38 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon 3 Mar 2008 16:07
Subject: Re: Microsoft's Scott Guthrie Lies About/Twists "Cross-platform" to Hijack Web

> 1) ... What proportion of Mono uses Microsoft's patented technology,
> including that which is is part of the ECMA specifications?

Read our policy on patents (Microsoft or otherwise):

http://www.mono-project.com/FAQ:_Licensing

Which is not different than any other open source project.

> 2) ... To what degree do you trust ECMA and the RAND covenant to not
> sue, for the use of any Microsoft Intellectual Property?

See the above link.

> 3) ... To what degree do you Trust Microsoft, either in terms of their
> promises; their motivations; or their commitment to a competing platform
> like Linux?

This is a question that is suitable for Teen magazine or Cosmo.

Sadly there is no bumper-sticker answer, or I would gladly give you
that.
This is a multi-dimensional question, that requires all the nuances of
a
full blog post.  You might want to read my interviews, my blog and
my position as stated on Slashdot.

> 4) ... Do you foresee a point in the future where access to much of the
> Web might be impossible, or at least extraordinarily difficult, without
> the use of Silverlight, much like Microsoft tried to do with ActiveX and
> other proprietary; encumbered; and non-standard technology during the
> Netscape years?

Another question suitable for Teen magazine.

Replace "Silverlight" with Javascript in the above question.   Can you
browse
the web without Javascript?   You certainly can, but some sites do not
work
without it.

Or replace "Silverlight" with "Flash", you certainly can browse
youtube, but
you will not get much out of it without it.

People will adopt Silverlight when it solves a problem for them, and
each person
will have to evaluate whether Silverlight over another technology is
the right
match for the problem.

> 5) ... Do you further forsee the likelihood that the binary blobs, that
> you speak of, become a hard dependency in order to fully utilise the
> future Web, as it will be reborn in Microsoft's image, given the
> possibility that Microsoft may develop new proprietary and encumbered
> codecs, or enforce their Intellectual Property rights on Free
> implementations of existing codecs, such as those used in FFMPEG?

You are not required to use the binary blobs.   You can build
Moonlight yourself
and use the FFMPEG codecs.

Novell will not be redistributing the FFMPEG based code due to the
conflict that
the LGPL has with the patents owned by MPEGLA (to which we will become
licensors).

> 6) ... Therefore do you concede that it is possible, and indeed likely,
> that the future of the Web (and in other contexts - office documents and
> software development) might end up becoming utterly dependent of
> Microsoft's Intellectual Property, and thus effectively controlled (in
> essence "owned") by Microsoft, just as they have been striving to do for
> so long, and have currently succeeded in other areas, such as the OEM
> channel; games development; hardware support; and elsewhere?

You seem confused, and you seem to be asking questions and answering
those
yourself.

> 7) ... And finally, do you think it is prudent, or even morally right,
> for Free Software developers to essentially help Microsoft in their
> endeavours to dominate the Web; office formats; and software
> development, particularly as Microsoft has continuously expressed so
> much contempt and hatred for the principles of Free Software and Open
> Standards over the years?

I have blogged extensively about this question, you might want to read
my
blog on those subjects.  There are two dimensions to this problem, and
I have addressed both: a) Microsoft providing a tool that people
actually
want to use, with a feature range of things that are genuinely useful
while
nobody else is;   (b) whether its good for Linux to be a second class
citizen
on the web when you are unable to watch content.

Miguel


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
93.  Linonut  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 3 Mar 2008, 16:51
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
From: Linonut <lino...@bollsouth.nut>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 11:51:57 -0500
Local: Mon 3 Mar 2008 16:51
Subject: Re: Microsoft's Scott Guthrie Lies About/Twists "Cross-platform" to Hijack Web
* Miguel de Icaza peremptorily fired off this memo:

>> 1) ... What proportion of Mono uses Microsoft's patented technology,
>> including that which is is part of the ECMA specifications?

> Read our policy on patents (Microsoft or otherwise):

> http://www.mono-project.com/FAQ:_Licensing

> Which is not different than any other open source project.

It sure as hell is different:

   Both the Mono runtime and the Mono C# Compiler are also available
   under a proprietary license for those who can not use the LGPL and
   the GPL in their code.

   For licensing details, contact mono-licens...@novell.com
   (mailto:mono-licens...@novell.com)

Isn't that statement rather, uh, arrogant?

> (b) whether its good for Linux to be a second class citizen on the web
> when you are unable to watch content.

You need to rephrase it.  The question is whether it is good to convert
citizens into second-class citizens on the web by virtue of restricting
their access to content to a format promulgated by a large, powerful,
and dominant corporation, requiring the relatively expensive purchase of
a proprietary (and unlicensed for production by any other vendor)
operating system.

--
We always overestimate the change that will occur in the next two years and
underestimate the change that will occur in the next ten. Don't let yourself
be lulled into inaction.
   -- Bill Gates


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
94.  Troy Kirkland  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 3 Mar 2008, 17:05
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
From: "Troy Kirkland" <k...@google.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:05:03 -0500
Local: Mon 3 Mar 2008 17:05
Subject: Re: Microsoft's Scott Guthrie Lies About/Twists "Cross-platform" to Hijack Web

"Linonut" <lino...@bollsouth.nut> wrote in message

news:x0Wyj.5584$dT.3170@bignews1.bellsouth.net...

>* Miguel de Icaza peremptorily fired off this memo:

>>> 1) ... What proportion of Mono uses Microsoft's patented technology,
>>> including that which is is part of the ECMA specifications?

>> Read our policy on patents (Microsoft or otherwise):

>> http://www.mono-project.com/FAQ:_Licensing

>> Which is not different than any other open source project.

> It sure as hell is different:

Okay, it's actually better than most OSS projects.

>   Both the Mono runtime and the Mono C# Compiler are also available
>   under a proprietary license for those who can not use the LGPL and
>   the GPL in their code.

So it's licensed as open source (GPL/LGPL) and can also be licensed under a
proprietary license for *those who can not use the LGPL/GPL in their code.*

What exactly is so confusing? Perhaps you don't have enough real world
experience to know that many organizations to not allow the use of LGPL/GPL
code. This allows those companies access to the technology.

How so?

>> (b) whether its good for Linux to be a second class citizen on the web
>> when you are unable to watch content.

> You need to rephrase it.  The question is whether it is good to convert
> citizens into second-class citizens on the web by virtue of restricting
> their access to content to a format promulgated by a large, powerful,
> and dominant corporation, requiring the relatively expensive purchase of
> a proprietary (and unlicensed for production by any other vendor)
> operating system.

It was phrased just fine the first time... before you decided to twist it
around to something that was never said or implied.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
95.  Hadron  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 3 Mar 2008, 17:19
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
From: Hadron <hadronqu...@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:19:42 +0100
Local: Mon 3 Mar 2008 17:19
Subject: Re: Microsoft's Scott Guthrie Lies About/Twists "Cross-platform" to Hijack Web

Linonut <lino...@bollsouth.nut> writes:
> * Miguel de Icaza peremptorily fired off this memo:

>>> 1) ... What proportion of Mono uses Microsoft's patented technology,
>>> including that which is is part of the ECMA specifications?

>> Read our policy on patents (Microsoft or otherwise):

>> http://www.mono-project.com/FAQ:_Licensing

>> Which is not different than any other open source project.

> It sure as hell is different:

LOL, Liarnut is getting all frisky.

Thread slink inevitable.

Bitch slapped by Schilling and heading for a slap from the original
Gnome developer.

Is no real OSS contributor safe from the know all arseholes in COLA?

What telling you he has already provided the information and has no
intention of typing it all in again you can ignore it and carry on
squealing like a little girl? No, it isn't. It is eminently sensible.

>> (b) whether its good for Linux to be a second class citizen on the web
>> when you are unable to watch content.

> You need to rephrase it.  The question is whether it is good to convert
> citizens into second-class citizens on the web by virtue of restricting
> their access to content to a format promulgated by a large, powerful,
> and dominant corporation, requiring the relatively expensive purchase of
> a proprietary (and unlicensed for production by any other vendor)
> operating system.

What a load of hot air.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
96.  Erik Funkenbusch  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
(1 user)  More options 3 Mar 2008, 19:05
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
From: Erik Funkenbusch <e...@despam-funkenbusch.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 14:05:35 -0500
Local: Mon 3 Mar 2008 19:05
Subject: Re: Microsoft's Scott Guthrie Lies About/Twists "Cross-platform" to Hijack Web

How is that different from QT, MySQL, or any of host of other open source
applications that offer proprietary licenses as well?

>> (b) whether its good for Linux to be a second class citizen on the web
>> when you are unable to watch content.

> You need to rephrase it.  The question is whether it is good to convert
> citizens into second-class citizens on the web by virtue of restricting
> their access to content to a format promulgated by a large, powerful,
> and dominant corporation, requiring the relatively expensive purchase of
> a proprietary (and unlicensed for production by any other vendor)
> operating system.

You don't need to purchase anything to use Silverlight on Linux, either to
create or view using Mono.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
97.  Hadron  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
(1 user)  More options 3 Mar 2008, 19:17
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
From: Hadron <hadronqu...@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:17:07 +0100
Local: Mon 3 Mar 2008 19:17
Subject: Re: Microsoft's Scott Guthrie Lies About/Twists "Cross-platform" to Hijack Web

You don't think for one minute that Liarnut actually read or understood
anything there do you? He's just posturing and showing off in his new
role as Roy's lapdog following the departure of Lapdog Colly.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
98.  Erik Funkenbusch  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 3 Mar 2008, 19:56
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
From: Erik Funkenbusch <e...@despam-funkenbusch.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 14:56:49 -0500
Local: Mon 3 Mar 2008 19:56
Subject: Re: Microsoft's Scott Guthrie Lies About/Twists "Cross-platform" to Hijack Web

On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:17:07 +0100, Hadron wrote:
>> How is that different from QT, MySQL, or any of host of other open source
>> applications that offer proprietary licenses as well?

> You don't think for one minute that Liarnut actually read or understood
> anything there do you? He's just posturing and showing off in his new
> role as Roy's lapdog following the departure of Lapdog Colly.

You're not helping the discourse by pulling this shit Hadron.

I understand you have a grudge, but please stop infecting other threads
just to piss all over.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
99.  Hadron  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 3 Mar 2008, 20:39
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
From: Hadron <hadronqu...@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 21:39:26 +0100
Local: Mon 3 Mar 2008 20:39
Subject: Re: Microsoft's Scott Guthrie Lies About/Twists "Cross-platform" to Hijack Web

Erik Funkenbusch <e...@despam-funkenbusch.com> writes:
> On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:17:07 +0100, Hadron wrote:

>>> How is that different from QT, MySQL, or any of host of other open source
>>> applications that offer proprietary licenses as well?

>> You don't think for one minute that Liarnut actually read or understood
>> anything there do you? He's just posturing and showing off in his new
>> role as Roy's lapdog following the departure of Lapdog Colly.

> You're not helping the discourse by pulling this shit Hadron.

> I understand you have a grudge, but please stop infecting other threads
> just to piss all over.

No, I have no grudge. But Liarnut is continually spouting nonsense,
calling people shills and just parroting Roy. This thread is a good
example. And while peter and the COLA gang feel free to rubbish facts,
then I see no problem with rubbishing nonsense.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
100.  The Ghost In The Machine  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 3 Mar 2008, 20:47
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
From: The Ghost In The Machine <ew...@sirius.tg00suus7038.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:47:05 -0800
Local: Mon 3 Mar 2008 20:47
Subject: Re: Microsoft's Scott Guthrie Lies About/Twists "Cross-platform" to Hijack Web
In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Erik Funkenbusch
<e...@despam-funkenbusch.com>
 wrote
on Mon, 3 Mar 2008 14:56:49 -0500
<m9aa3d29xwq7$....@funkenbusch.com>:

> On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:17:07 +0100, Hadron wrote:

>>> How is that different from QT, MySQL, or any of host of other open source
>>> applications that offer proprietary licenses as well?

>> You don't think for one minute that Liarnut actually read or understood
>> anything there do you? He's just posturing and showing off in his new
>> role as Roy's lapdog following the departure of Lapdog Colly.

> You're not helping the discourse by pulling this shit Hadron.

> I understand you have a grudge, but please stop infecting other threads
> just to piss all over.

Now now...this is relevant to COLA because he just might
be pissing on a laptop that happened to be running Linux
at the time.

Of course such an action would probably irreparably damage
the laptop.

(Hi Troy!)

--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
Error 16: Not enough space on file system to delete file(s)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google