|
|
comp.os.linux.advocacy |
>> * Miguel de Icaza peremptorily fired off this memo: >>>> 1) ... What proportion of Mono uses Microsoft's patented technology, >>> Read our policy on patents (Microsoft or otherwise): >>> http://www.mono-project.com/FAQ:_Licensing >>> Which is not different than any other open source project. >> It sure as hell is different: >> Both the Mono runtime and the Mono C# Compiler are also available >> For licensing details, contact mono-licens...@novell.com > How is that different from QT, MySQL, or any of host of other open source >>> (b) whether its good for Linux to be a second class citizen on the web >> You need to rephrase it. The question is whether it is good to convert > You don't need to purchase anything to use Silverlight on Linux, either to Erik Funkenbusch <e...@despam-funkenbusch.com> writes: You don't think for one minute that Liarnut actually read or understood
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 11:51:57 -0500, Linonut wrote:
>>>> including that which is is part of the ECMA specifications?
>> under a proprietary license for those who can not use the LGPL and
>> the GPL in their code.
>> (mailto:mono-licens...@novell.com)
> applications that offer proprietary licenses as well?
anything there do you? He's just posturing and showing off in his new
role as Roy's lapdog following the departure of Lapdog Colly.
>>> when you are unable to watch content.
>> citizens into second-class citizens on the web by virtue of restricting
>> their access to content to a format promulgated by a large, powerful,
>> and dominant corporation, requiring the relatively expensive purchase of
>> a proprietary (and unlicensed for production by any other vendor)
>> operating system.
> create or view using Mono.