> To my surprise, this proposal generated almost no discussion.  In fact,
> it seemed to mark the end of the original one, and since then people
> seem to have resigned themselves to values/call-with-values, occasional
> fulminations aside.

> My questions:

> 1.  Is this proposal still viable for Scheme, as a language, today?

> 2.  What are the thoughts of implementors on the proposal?

> 3.  Have people really resigned themselves to values/call-with-values,
>     both
>       a) as a specific means of handling multiple return values, and
>       b) as the philosophical departure from the roots of the language
>          they (arguably) represent?

> 4.  Does anyone have any other ideas for dealing with the problem of
>     multiple return values that haven't been raised yet?