Google Mail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Ray tracer in Stalin
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Follow-up To:
Add Cc | Add Follow-up to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers that you hear
 
Ray Dillinger  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 14 Aug 2005, 17:33
Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme
From: Ray Dillinger <b...@sonic.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:33:25 GMT
Local: Sun 14 Aug 2005 17:33
Subject: Re: Ray tracer in Stalin

Jon Harrop wrote:
> I hadn't expected a simple Lisp or Scheme implementation to be able to
> compete in terms of performance but only 70% slower on 32-bit AMD64 when
> C++ and OCaml are fully 64-bit is very impressive, IMHO.

There are things I don't like about Stalin (related mostly to its
"static" nature and skimpy error handling), but raw speed is one
thing it's terribly good at.  A *LOT* of work has gone into the
Stalin compiler to make it compile code that runs fast.  It is not
an example of a "simple" implementation.

                                Bear


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google