Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme
From: Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen <kjet...@notam02.no>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 00:44:53 +0200
Local: Sun 14 Aug 2005 23:44
Subject: Re: Ray tracer in Stalin
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Jon Harrop wrote: Its a shame theres so much difference. Would be interesting > I've just done a little benchmarking of the ray tracer written in Scheme and > $ g++ -O3 -march=athlon-tbird -ffast-math ray.cpp -o ray > $ mlton ray.sml > $ ocamlopt -inline 100 -ffast-math ray.ml -o ray > $ stalin -d0 -d1 -d5 -d6 -On -q -d -architecture IA32-align-double > On AMD64 (1.8GHz Athlon64): > $ g++ -O3 -march=athlon-tbird -ffast-math ray.cpp -o ray > $ mlton ray.sml > $ ocamlopt -inline 100 -ffast-math ray.ml -o ray > $ stalin -d0 -d1 -d5 -d6 -On -q -d -architecture IA32-align-double > I hadn't expected a simple Lisp or Scheme implementation to be able to to see what results cmucl or sbcl gives. Have you posted a request to comp.lang.lisp? Anyway, perhaps you could try the following options for stalin? I got -d0 -d1 -d5 -d6 -On -k -Ob -Om -Or -Ot -q -d -architecture -- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||