|
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
From: Simon Brunning <simon.brunn...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 12:05:21 +0100
Local: Wed 28 Sep 2005 12:05
Subject: Re: Will python never intend to support private, protected and public?
On 9/28/05, could ildg <could....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Python is wonderful except that it has no real private and protected My convention, attributes with names prefixed with a single underscore > properties and methods. > Every py object has dict so that you can easily find what fields and methods > an obj has, > this is very convenient, but because of this, py is very hard to support > real private and > protected? are private. There's nothing to stop anyone using these, but, well, if you take the back off the radio, the warranty is void. > If private and protected is supported, python will be perfect. If *real* private and protected are *enforced*, Python will be the poorer for it. See <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/msg/b977ed1312e10b21>. -- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||