Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Google Mail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Very poor Lisp performance
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Follow-up To:
Add Cc | Add Follow-up to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers that you hear
 
Jon Harrop  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 14 Aug 2005, 11:24
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: Jon Harrop <use...@jdh30.plus.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 11:24:20 +0100
Local: Sun 14 Aug 2005 11:24
Subject: Re: Very poor Lisp performance

Svenne Krap wrote:
> Raffael Cavallaro wrote:
>> just as an additional data point, this code runs in just over 6 seconds
>> in sbcl 0.9.3 on a dual 2.0 GHz G5 (though sbcl only uses one processor).

> On a single Xeon 3.4 GHz with sbcl 0.9.3:

> Evaluation took:
>    3.783 seconds of real time
>    3.305498 seconds of user run time
>    0.477927 seconds of system run time
>    0 page faults and
>    509,576,768 bytes consed

On my 1.8GHz AMD64 in 32-bit mode with SBCL 0.9.3 I'm now getting:

    5.21 seconds of real time
    4.15 seconds of user run time
    0.62 seconds of system run time
    0 page faults and
    509,569,248 bytes consed

This seems to be on-par with other people's observations.

This compares to 1.037s for OCaml and 0.987s for C++, so SBCL is now much
more competitive.

Thanks for all the help!

--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
http://www.ffconsultancy.com


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google