Very poor Lisp performance - comp.lang.lisp

Message from discussion Very poor Lisp performance
Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed1.uni2.dk!dfeeder1.cybercity.dk!dspool1.cybercity.dk!dreader1.cybercity.dk!not-for-mail
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 10:51:44 +0200
From: Svenne Krap <svenne.u2...@krap.dk>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Subject: Re: Very poor Lisp performance
References: <42fdd7a8$0$97130$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net> <2005081321013216807%raffaelcavallaro@pasdespamsilvousplaitmaccom>
In-Reply-To: <2005081321013216807%raffaelcavallaro@pasdespamsilvousplaitmaccom>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <42ff04a9$0$78285$157c6196@dreader1.cybercity.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.242.135.229
X-Trace: 1124009130 dreader1.cybercity.dk 78285 212.242.135.229:15896

Raffael Cavallaro wrote:
> On 2005-08-13 07:18:40 -0400, Jon Harrop <use...@jdh30.plus.com> said:
> 
>> Here is Nathan Baum's port for CMUCL and SBCL:
> 
> 
> just as an additional data point, this code runs in just over 6 seconds 
> in sbcl 0.9.3 on a dual 2.0 GHz G5 (though sbcl only uses one processor).

On a single Xeon 3.4 GHz with sbcl 0.9.3:

Evaluation took:
   3.783 seconds of real time
   3.305498 seconds of user run time
   0.477927 seconds of system run time
   0 page faults and
   509,576,768 bytes consed