|
|
comp.lang.lisp |
On Feb 22, 5:59 am, Mark Tarver <dr.mtar...@ukonline.co.uk> wrote: > > Having got 3936 LOC through a 4000 LOC implementation, I thought I'd > > 1. The script itself should be changeable by any novice. That is to > > 2. The program should receive keyboard input from the user - > > During the Harrop Wars on comp.lang.lisp a lot of stuff was thrown > > Oh last thing; don't get too uptight about this. It's only a bit of > > Mark > Well here is my shot at it in Qi. Total LOC excluding script is 70 Sample session: ? Hi. I'm going to be your worst nightmare. Script = def change_person s patterns, symbols, replies = [], [], [] Script.each{|ary|
> On 22 Feb, 11:49, Mark Tarver <dr.mtar...@ukonline.co.uk> wrote: I added some features and wrote it in Ruby.
> > do some recreational
> > hacking and do an old old program I've not looked at for some time -
> > Eliza. You all know Eliza well enough for me not to have to spell it
> > out. The challenge is to implement or dig up an Eliza program (you
> > don't have to write it yourself) in your favourite FPL. Note that the
> > script that drives Eliza's responses should not be counted towards the
> > LOC count. Some constraints.
> > say that it should not
> > be a pile of hard-wired code written in the native language of
> > the program or require
> > deep programming skills.
> > including the usual punctuation
> > and any characters he wants to enter without crashing.
> > around about the desirability of pattern matching. The challenge is
> > interesting because it involves a style of pattern-matching called
> > 'segment pattern matching' that is not hard-wired into most FPLs and
> > I'd like to see how well different FPLs cope with something outside
> > the standard.
> > fun.
> LOC.
Why are you going to be my worst nightmare?
? I think you're full of it.
Why do you think I am full of it?
? My mother told me so.
Tell me about your mother.
? No. You tell me about yours.
We're talking about you, not me.
? You're obviously retarded.
Please don't be so personal.
? Damn your eyes!
I'm not sure that I understand you fully.
? Understand a kick in the pants?
Can you elaborate on that?
? I always ignore idiots.
Why do you always ignore idiots?
? I am afraid of dinosaurs.
Have you always been afraid of dinosaurs?
? quit
[[:x, ["father",'mother','brother','sister'], :y],
["Tell me about your ", :_, "."]],
[[:x, ["am", "i'm"], :y], [["Why are you", :y, "?"],
["Have you always been", :y, "?"]]],
[[:x, "I", :y], ["Why do you", :y, "?"]],
[[:x, 'you', :y], [["We're talking about you, not me."],
["Please don't be so personal."]]],
[[:x], [["That's very interesting. Do go on."],
["Tell me more."],
["I'm not sure that I understand you fully."],
["Can you elaborate on that?"] ]]
h = { 'I','you', 'my','your', 'myself','yourself',
'you are','I am', "you're", 'I am' }
tmp = s.scan(/you are|you're|\w+|\W+/).map{|s|
h[s] or h.invert[s] or s }
tmp[-1] = "me" if "I" == tmp[-1]
tmp.join
end
syms = []
patterns << Regexp.new( "^" +
ary[0].map{|x|
case x
when Symbol
syms << x
"(.*?)"
when String
"\\b#{ x }\\b"
when Array
syms << :_
"\\b(#{ x.join('|') })\\b"
else
".*?"
end
}.join + "$", true ) # Case-insensitive.
symbols << syms
ary[1] = ary[1].sort_by{ rand } if ary[1][0].is_a? Array
replies << ary[1]
} while true
print "? "
resp = gets.strip.sub(/[.!?,;]+$/, "")
break if 'quit' == resp
patterns.each_with_index{|pat,i|
if match_data = resp.match( pat )
reply = replies[i]
if reply[0].is_a? Array
# Rotate replies for variety.
reply.push( reply.shift )
reply = reply[0]
end
captures = match_data.captures.map{|s| change_person s}
# Create associative array mapping symbols to values.
t = Hash[ *symbols[i].zip( captures ).flatten ]
puts reply.map{|x| x.is_a?(Symbol) ? t[x] : x }.join
break
end
}
end