comp.lang.lisp | Google Groups

Re: Very poor Lisp performance

Juho Snellman <jsn...@iki.fi>

<fate...@cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> ; 967,240 cons cells, 3,719,472,272 other bytes, 4,472 static bytes
[...]
> ; 418,422 cons cells, 292,782,544 other bytes, 0 static bytes

Cute. I presume Allegro can completely optimize away the allocation of
temporary structs consisting of only double-floats, but doesn't do
this for single-floats?

--
Juho Snellman
"Premature profiling is the root of all evil."