Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Google Mail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
comp.lang.lisp
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Very poor Lisp performance
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Follow-up To:
Add Cc | Add Follow-up to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers that you hear
 
Juho Snellman  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 14 Aug 2005, 07:56
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
From: Juho Snellman <jsn...@iki.fi>
Date: 14 Aug 2005 06:56:20 GMT
Local: Sun 14 Aug 2005 07:56
Subject: Re: Very poor Lisp performance
Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

<fate...@cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> ;  967,240 cons cells, 3,719,472,272 other bytes, 4,472 static bytes
[...]
> ;  418,422 cons cells, 292,782,544 other bytes, 0 static bytes

Cute. I presume Allegro can completely optimize away the allocation of
temporary structs consisting of only double-floats, but doesn't do
this for single-floats?

--
Juho Snellman
"Premature profiling is the root of all evil."


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google