Is there ABR,GRD file spec in Adobe Photoshop SDK?
The group you are posting to is a
Usenet group . Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: comp.graphics.apps.photoshop
From:
sung... @yahoo.com (Sunghun Kim)
Date: 3 Dec 2004 12:19:38 -0800
Local: Fri 3 Dec 2004 20:19
Subject: Is there ABR,GRD file spec in Adobe Photoshop SDK?
Can I get the brush (ABR) and Gradient (GRD) file format if I purchase the Adobe Photoshop SDK?
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: comp.graphics.apps.photoshop
From:
Chris Cox <c... @mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 05:48:00 GMT
Subject: Re: Is there ABR,GRD file spec in Adobe Photoshop SDK?
No, both of those are now too complex to document easily.
Sorry,
Chris
In article <f8584a99.0412031219.6945... @posting.google.com>, Sunghun
Kim <sung
... @yahoo.com> wrote:
> Can I get the brush (ABR) and Gradient (GRD) file format
> if I purchase the Adobe Photoshop SDK?
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: comp.graphics.apps.photoshop
From:
t... @telegraphics.com.au (Toby Thain)
Date: 5 Dec 2004 14:32:27 -0800
Local: Sun 5 Dec 2004 22:32
Subject: Re: Is there ABR,GRD file spec in Adobe Photoshop SDK?
God help those maintaining them then. Complex + undocumented = ?? --T
> Sorry,
> Chris
> In article <f8584a99.0412031219.6945... @posting.google.com>, Sunghun > Kim <sung... @yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Can I get the brush (ABR) and Gradient (GRD) file format > > if I purchase the Adobe Photoshop SDK?
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Newsgroups: comp.graphics.apps.photoshop
From:
Chris Cox <c... @mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 04:09:52 GMT
Local: Mon 6 Dec 2004 04:09
Subject: Re: Is there ABR,GRD file spec in Adobe Photoshop SDK?
In article <d6ce4a6c.0412051432.1f929... @posting.google.com>, Toby
Thain <t
... @telegraphics.com.au> wrote:
> Chris Cox <c
... @mindspring.com> wrote in message
> <
news:041220042146481226%ccox@mindspring.com >...
> > No, both of those are now too complex to document easily.
> God help those maintaining them then. Complex + undocumented = ??
Internally, they're simple (and documented). But they rely on a complex mechanism (action descriptors) that gets updated with every release... Chris
You must
Sign in before you can post messages.
You do not have the permission required to post.