<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded</id>
  <title type="text">comp.arch.embedded Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Embedded computer systems topics.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/comp.arch.embedded/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="comp.arch.embedded feed"/>
  <updated>2009-11-08T17:16:50Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.co.uk" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>D Yuniskis</name>
  <email>not.going.to...@seen.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-08T17:16:50Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/9557e970ac0a67f9/f6c96e7b2e9bdaae?show_docid=f6c96e7b2e9bdaae</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/9557e970ac0a67f9/f6c96e7b2e9bdaae?show_docid=f6c96e7b2e9bdaae"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Time</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  POSIX *used* to allow for *double* leap seconds. I think &lt;br&gt; that capability has been removed. &lt;br&gt; Note that leap seconds can also *subtract* a second (though &lt;br&gt; this has never? happened) &lt;br&gt; *All* &amp;quot;human formatted&amp;quot; time schemes are PITAs for machines. &lt;br&gt; The only realistic way to track time is just to count seconds.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Joe Pfeiffer</name>
  <email>pfeif...@cs.nmsu.edu</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-08T17:09:56Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/bc58ce46366afe4e/19dd15f1d0f4d34d?show_docid=19dd15f1d0f4d34d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/bc58ce46366afe4e/19dd15f1d0f4d34d?show_docid=19dd15f1d0f4d34d"/>
  <title type="text">Re: mmap returning MAP_FAILED</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  That would do terrible things to the utility of shared memory -- no, &lt;br&gt; MAP_SHARED and PROT_WRITE are compatible. Maybe you&#39;re thinking of &lt;br&gt; MAP_SHARED and MAP_ANONYMOUS (which didn&#39;t used to be compatible, but is &lt;br&gt; since 2.4).
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>dzone007</name>
  <email>joseph...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-08T17:07:46Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/cd235036581d6181/d9dc2ba4a579271d?show_docid=d9dc2ba4a579271d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/cd235036581d6181/d9dc2ba4a579271d?show_docid=d9dc2ba4a579271d"/>
  <title type="text">Need help from programming masters (USB hub)</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi guys! &lt;br&gt; I am just wondering if you could give some codes regarding the operation of &lt;br&gt; the USB hub. Since a USB host is capable of communicating to a single &lt;br&gt; device, I was thinking of using the USB hub as the device. The &lt;br&gt; communication is from HOST to HUB. However, I need a piece of code to &lt;br&gt; communicate to the hub to enumerate it and learn about physical bus events
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Andrew Smallshaw</name>
  <email>andr...@sdf.lonestar.org</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-08T16:59:46Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/e17532e06a6ea0c9/28b352700d9f85d3?show_docid=28b352700d9f85d3</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/e17532e06a6ea0c9/28b352700d9f85d3?show_docid=28b352700d9f85d3"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Use of MAX232 as power supply for operational amplifier in 5V powered system?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I like it because it is dirt cheap. Last time I needed fairly &lt;br&gt; small quantities of an RS232 driver the ST232 was 70-odd pence a &lt;br&gt; peice. The MAX232 was around four or five times that as I remember. &lt;br&gt; That&#39;s a big premium simply for the brand name genuine part.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>D Yuniskis</name>
  <email>not.going.to...@seen.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-08T17:05:28Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/9557e970ac0a67f9/534152183d41cec5?show_docid=534152183d41cec5</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/9557e970ac0a67f9/534152183d41cec5?show_docid=534152183d41cec5"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Time</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  My point is that by *defining* system time to be a monotonically &lt;br&gt; increasing, unresetable function, you *can* make this assumption &lt;br&gt; for &amp;quot;system times&amp;quot;. I.e., if you look at the system time &lt;br&gt; at any arbitrary time, T1, and then look at it at *any* &lt;br&gt; arbitrary time thereafter, T2, you *know* that T2 &amp;gt; T1. &lt;br&gt; By definition. :&amp;gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Andrew Smallshaw</name>
  <email>andr...@sdf.lonestar.org</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-08T16:39:05Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/9557e970ac0a67f9/706669fc6856a561?show_docid=706669fc6856a561</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/9557e970ac0a67f9/706669fc6856a561?show_docid=706669fc6856a561"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Time</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Many, many bugs have been caused by this kind of assumption. &lt;br&gt; Perhaps the most notable example is the lbolt variable inside &lt;br&gt; traditionally structured Unix kernels. I&#39;m most familiar with it &lt;br&gt; from dealing with SCO Unix in the past but ISTR it affected other &lt;br&gt; systems too, mostly with third party drivers where the develpers
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Paul Keinanen</name>
  <email>keina...@sci.fi</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-08T16:35:04Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/9557e970ac0a67f9/c8a887bad02d4f16?show_docid=c8a887bad02d4f16</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/9557e970ac0a67f9/c8a887bad02d4f16?show_docid=c8a887bad02d4f16"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Time</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:27:02 +0000, Paul E Bennett &lt;br&gt; The UTC is not a linear time scale due to the leap seconds that are &lt;br&gt; added at random intervals (3, 6, 9, 12, 15 .. month) due to the &lt;br&gt; slowing down of the rotation of the Earth. When the leap second is &lt;br&gt; added, the clock should count 23:59:59, 23:59:60, 00:00:00 ....
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Rich Webb</name>
  <email>bbew...@mapson.nozirev.ten</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-08T16:25:38Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/add4c2f05f1b44bc/240285c6a1051f18?show_docid=240285c6a1051f18</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/add4c2f05f1b44bc/240285c6a1051f18?show_docid=240285c6a1051f18"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Software real time clock using timer unit</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:35:23 -0600, &amp;quot;alex99&amp;quot; &amp;lt;alex.xande...@gmail.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; Decide on a useful interval. For a human-space display, a 1 Hz update is &lt;br&gt; plenty. Then, given your device&#39;s clock, PLL setting, and peripheral &lt;br&gt; clock divider, select a prescaler and match register pair that results &lt;br&gt; in a 1 Hz event. Set the timer&#39;s control registers appropriately and,
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Vladimir Vassilevsky</name>
  <email>nos...@nowhere.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-08T16:22:55Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/9557e970ac0a67f9/66acaec650438de8?show_docid=66acaec650438de8</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/9557e970ac0a67f9/66acaec650438de8?show_docid=66acaec650438de8"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Time</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  The process tells the system that it should be notified about the time &lt;br&gt; changes. So, even if the process is not running, the system could &lt;br&gt; activate it. &lt;br&gt; Where is a problem? There are many &amp;quot;relative&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;absolute&amp;quot; qualities &lt;br&gt; besides time. You deal with relative or absolute time just like you deal &lt;br&gt; with relative or absolute path, so to speak.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Kaph</name>
  <email>86jackc...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-08T16:20:26Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/f87fa52657c38f79/816ff00e207bbbdf?show_docid=816ff00e207bbbdf</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/f87fa52657c38f79/816ff00e207bbbdf?show_docid=816ff00e207bbbdf"/>
  <title type="text">IWC Classic Pilot Automatic Chronograph Mens Watch IW371712</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  IWC Classic Pilot Automatic Chronograph Mens Watch IW371712 &lt;br&gt; Wholesale Price : $170.00 &lt;br&gt; Retail Price : $198.00 &lt;br&gt; Click here to get more info : &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.umwatch.com/products/IWC_Classic_Pilot_Automatic_Chronograph_Mens_Watch_IW371712-1116-144.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; .............................. ............................
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Arlet</name>
  <email>usene...@ladybug.xs4all.nl</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-08T16:16:38Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/add4c2f05f1b44bc/29671bbd8e8107be?show_docid=29671bbd8e8107be</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/add4c2f05f1b44bc/29671bbd8e8107be?show_docid=29671bbd8e8107be"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Software real time clock using timer unit</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  It would help if you told which ARM controller you&#39;re using.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>alex99</name>
  <email>alex.xande...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-08T16:02:56Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/f9cf78b2d7423854/e16aa53986eae8e6?show_docid=e16aa53986eae8e6</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/f9cf78b2d7423854/e16aa53986eae8e6?show_docid=e16aa53986eae8e6"/>
  <title type="text">Why do I get the this error - &quot;Read from unprogrammed EEPROM address&quot;</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Mu Code for HC12 is given below : &lt;br&gt; USER_STACKTOP	equ	$0a00	;just above RAM area &lt;br&gt; PORTA	equ	$0000	;Port A register &lt;br&gt; PORTB	equ	$0001	;Port B register &lt;br&gt; PORTP	equ	$0056	;Port P register &lt;br&gt; DDRA	equ	$0002	;Port A Data Direction Register &lt;br&gt; DDRB	equ	$0003	;Port B Data Direction Register &lt;br&gt; DDRP	equ	$0057	;Port P Data Direction Register
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>D Yuniskis</name>
  <email>not.going.to...@seen.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-08T15:46:41Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/d80a2da77689a422/b249d768e09162cd?show_docid=b249d768e09162cd</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/d80a2da77689a422/b249d768e09162cd?show_docid=b249d768e09162cd"/>
  <title type="text">Re: What coding standard are you using for C?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;lt;grin&amp;gt; Or folks who used &amp;quot;VCR data recorders&amp;quot; manufactured &lt;br&gt; iin somebody&#39;s garage... &lt;br&gt; *This* is the key issue here! 20 years ago I spent several weeks &lt;br&gt; takiing everything that I had archived (floppies of various &lt;br&gt; sizes, 9 track tape, a slew of other oddball tapes, etc.) and &lt;br&gt; copied it onto &amp;quot;modern media&amp;quot;. Since then, every project
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>alex99</name>
  <email>alex.xande...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-08T15:35:23Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/add4c2f05f1b44bc/17239dd3ab9ac926?show_docid=17239dd3ab9ac926</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/add4c2f05f1b44bc/17239dd3ab9ac926?show_docid=17239dd3ab9ac926"/>
  <title type="text">Software real time clock using timer unit</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I am trying to implement a software real-time clock on ARM using &lt;br&gt; the timer module. &lt;br&gt; I am pretty much unable to do it at this point and was hoping that someone &lt;br&gt; could point me in the right direction -- perhaps even coded examples that &lt;br&gt; could serve as a way to better understand it. I C language but am a newbie
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Paul E Bennett</name>
  <email>paul_e.benn...@topmail.co.uk</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-08T15:28:13Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/d80a2da77689a422/f767d0df1bf14ece?show_docid=f767d0df1bf14ece</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_thread/thread/d80a2da77689a422/f767d0df1bf14ece?show_docid=f767d0df1bf14ece"/>
  <title type="text">Re: What coding standard are you using for C?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  [%X] &lt;br&gt; [%X] &lt;br&gt; Wonder how many remember as far back as the Kansas City Tape Standard for &lt;br&gt; Data Recording onto Audio Cassettes. If really pressed I could still cobble &lt;br&gt; one of those up. However, if it was really important data to keep, then it &lt;br&gt; should have been subject to a migration policy so that it was appropriately
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
