Message from discussion
Deploying without SCM
Received: by 10.114.77.1 with SMTP id z1mr31053waa.15.1246557646012;
Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <joseph.e.mcdon...@gmail.com>
Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com (rv-out-0708.google.com [209.85.198.245])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id m37si915286waf.5.2009.07.02.11.00.44;
Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:00:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of joseph.e.mcdon...@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.245 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.198.245;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of joseph.e.mcdon...@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.245 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=joseph.e.mcdon...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id l33so802323rvb.40
for <capistrano@googlegroups.com>; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from
:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=cDotzd65u7o6vEjJBonEL2V9zam5mjKajErLNvoMppw=;
b=GqNJZVKe8T6govspwdqR7F9WtiyHAuQ5N0TPoi/U4JFbgrAb4M4CFyweETY02FMve8
8LqKqQdHmlaFxJGT3v/JyMeEshQeAzQBCTcci6LTt+rFW4wCmd0WoU4nAvZ66kgUesvN
JQjK+fLsTHfymE6RD1ne0QxPkXVs6CRG7XqKw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=jZeJu7E1CzQ3wSl4NfMEJJ/X1IIBRWffpadsH+skhq1OrwfN79tjXa0ScCe0befQBG
qKxiHLs8qG7TvHSGSKq1DtTRzV9wuOJjyKVSsm8s+dwKd/zynTvaYSuyhhsBBEZT8m+B
Xp7YHrfWPnmHyY3vv7tybzZmqs3txzNCWdrao=
Received: by 10.141.52.8 with SMTP id e8mr474578rvk.2.1246557644943;
Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <joseph.e.mcdon...@gmail.com>
Received: from ?10.1.90.110? (67.110.140.194.ptr.us.xo.net [67.110.140.194])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c20sm2560426rvf.39.2009.07.02.11.00.43
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4A4CF5CD.6060...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:00:45 -0400
From: Joe McDonagh <joseph.e.mcdon...@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
To: capistrano@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [capistrano] Deploying without SCM
References: <8fe543af-ba06-4f1b-9748-5e7606772...@b14g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <8fe543af-ba06-4f1b-9748-5e7606772...@b14g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
sixones wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've seen this question pop up a few times but haven't been able to
> find a clear answer. Is there away to deploy with Capistrano without
> using SCM? I like the idea of the automated deployment strategies
> available with Capistrano and would like to benefit rather than
> manually uploading via SFTP etc..
>
> I fully understand how important SCM is but I'm planning on using
> Capistrano to deploy binary builds to a remote server. Storing the
> builds inside a repository just doesn't make sense for obvious
> reasons.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> >
>
There is a 'put' method that uses scp to transfer files. You can make a
task that uses this method to upload binaries.
--
Joe McDonagh
Operations Engineer
www.colonfail.com
|
