<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>Capistrano Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano</link>
  <description>Discussion about the Capistrano remote management tool. Share tips and recipe files. Discuss the development of extensions and plugins, as well as the implementation of Capistrano itself.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] Re: Capistrano seemingly freezes on deploy (used to work fine)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/7e7dca3214fe0dc0/1c0201dbbdb2260a?show_docid=1c0201dbbdb2260a</link>
  <description>
  Indeed, I would argue that this is a better approach and should be made &lt;br&gt; the default. &lt;br&gt; For example, it means that you don&#39;t have to have subversion installed &lt;br&gt; on your production servers, and only your deployment server needs access &lt;br&gt; to your subversion repository. &lt;br&gt; In fact, I don&#39;t personally see *any* benefit in deploying with :svn
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/7e7dca3214fe0dc0/1c0201dbbdb2260a?show_docid=1c0201dbbdb2260a</guid>
  <author>
  robin-li...@robinbowes.com
  (Robin Bowes)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:16:27 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] Re: Capistrano seemingly freezes on deploy (used to work fine)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/7e7dca3214fe0dc0/4bd04c03afb7c748?show_docid=4bd04c03afb7c748</link>
  <description>
  If you&#39;ve got SVN connection issues on the remote server, don&#39;t forget &lt;br&gt; that you can work around them by using the :copy strategy, which will &lt;br&gt; do a local checkout on the machine where ca is running, create a &lt;br&gt; tarball, ship it over and unack into the familiar releases/ &amp;amp; current/ &lt;br&gt; directory structure. &lt;br&gt; See &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://weblog.jamisbuck.org/2008/5/2/capistrano-2-3-0&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; for more info.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/7e7dca3214fe0dc0/4bd04c03afb7c748?show_docid=4bd04c03afb7c748</guid>
  <author>
  r...@deadcrow.net
  (Rory Gibson)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:30:47 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Capistrano seemingly freezes on deploy (used to work fine)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/7e7dca3214fe0dc0/1ff1c52fd5f7b9a3?show_docid=1ff1c52fd5f7b9a3</link>
  <description>
  Hi Rafael, &lt;br&gt; Thanks for your help, I checked out the docs for the setting, and &lt;br&gt; tried it out but to no avail, see my reply to Lee for more &lt;br&gt; information. &lt;br&gt; Cheers &lt;br&gt; Ant
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/7e7dca3214fe0dc0/1ff1c52fd5f7b9a3?show_docid=1ff1c52fd5f7b9a3</guid>
  <author>
  webch...@gmail.com
  (antum)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 09:57:08 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Capistrano seemingly freezes on deploy (used to work fine)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/7e7dca3214fe0dc0/42caf2b9333fa272?show_docid=42caf2b9333fa272</link>
  <description>
  Hi Lee, &lt;br&gt; Many thanks for your reply, I&#39;ve only just had a chance to sit down in &lt;br&gt; front of the computer. So... &lt;br&gt; Is remote_cache enabled by default? I don&#39;t have it set anywhere in my &lt;br&gt; deploy.rb &lt;br&gt; I just tried a checkout locally, it took 5 minutes, I tried the same &lt;br&gt; thing from the server and it&#39;s still going after 32 minutes...
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/7e7dca3214fe0dc0/42caf2b9333fa272?show_docid=42caf2b9333fa272</guid>
  <author>
  webch...@gmail.com
  (antum)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 09:55:26 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] Capistrano seemingly freezes on deploy (used to work fine)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/7e7dca3214fe0dc0/cac518b913540a1a?show_docid=cac518b913540a1a</link>
  <description>
  Hi Ant, &lt;br&gt; Could you try to add this line to your deploy.rb ? &lt;br&gt; default_run_options[:pty] = true &lt;br&gt; More info about this change: &lt;br&gt; :pty option - &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.capify.org/index.php/Run#options&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Regards
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/7e7dca3214fe0dc0/cac518b913540a1a?show_docid=cac518b913540a1a</guid>
  <author>
  r...@aspgems.com
  (Rafael G.)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2009 15:59:42 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] Capistrano seemingly freezes on deploy (used to work fine)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/7e7dca3214fe0dc0/1d33c6f5cc3258fa?show_docid=1d33c6f5cc3258fa</link>
  <description>
  Ant, first thing that comes to mind is a repository problem; whenever people &lt;br&gt; have problems – we usually recommend that they don&#39;t use :remote_cache for &lt;br&gt; deploying, but it might work for you. &lt;br&gt; My suggestion, before you try that would be to manually go onto the server; &lt;br&gt; crank up the log level and try a checkout from your repository. Also, check
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/7e7dca3214fe0dc0/1d33c6f5cc3258fa?show_docid=1d33c6f5cc3258fa</guid>
  <author>
  lee.hamb...@gmail.com
  (Lee Hambley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2009 09:37:28 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Capistrano seemingly freezes on deploy (used to work fine)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/7e7dca3214fe0dc0/d9764e3545371ed0?show_docid=d9764e3545371ed0</link>
  <description>
  Hi there, &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m trying to deploy a PHP application from SubVersion source control &lt;br&gt; to a single server. The recipe hasn&#39;t changed and it used to work &lt;br&gt; fine, but now it stops after doing a svn checkout and doesn&#39;t budge &lt;br&gt; for hours until I press Cmd+C (I&#39;m in Terminal, on a Mac) &lt;br&gt; See &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://pastebin.ca/1718985&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; for my Terminal output. (You can see
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/7e7dca3214fe0dc0/d9764e3545371ed0?show_docid=d9764e3545371ed0</guid>
  <author>
  webch...@gmail.com
  (antum)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2009 01:56:47 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Newcomer Problem</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/5c1bbaec50d3086e/b4c84a3a2b7b12cb?show_docid=b4c84a3a2b7b12cb</link>
  <description>
  &#39;deploy_via, :copy&#39; did the trick, thanks so much!!!
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/5c1bbaec50d3086e/b4c84a3a2b7b12cb?show_docid=b4c84a3a2b7b12cb</guid>
  <author>
  mafor...@gmail.com
  (mafordha)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2009 00:34:44 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] Re: Deploying Error: `split&#39; called for 440:Fixnum</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/dfc7bc016fa7b896?show_docid=dfc7bc016fa7b896</link>
  <description>
  Memo, thanks - I spoke with a friend of yours on IRC – I will try to package &lt;br&gt; a debug version of Cap which can give you better output. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;-- Lee Hambley &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Twitter: @leehambley | @capistranorb &lt;br&gt; Blog: &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://lee.hambley.name/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Working with Rails: &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://is.gd/1s5W1&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;2009/12/16 Memo &amp;lt;m...@52nineteen.com&amp;gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/dfc7bc016fa7b896?show_docid=dfc7bc016fa7b896</guid>
  <author>
  lee.hamb...@gmail.com
  (Lee Hambley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 16:04:39 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Deploying Error: `split&#39; called for 440:Fixnum</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/20fe5f36b6422ccd?show_docid=20fe5f36b6422ccd</link>
  <description>
  I tried using the same test using my mac book and came up with the &lt;br&gt; same error. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://pastie.org/pastes/745777&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/20fe5f36b6422ccd?show_docid=20fe5f36b6422ccd</guid>
  <author>
  m...@52nineteen.com
  (Memo)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 15:59:49 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Deploying Error: `split&#39; called for 440:Fixnum</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/5ddf1e36627e3407?show_docid=5ddf1e36627e3407</link>
  <description>
  It did not work. So is the problem on my machine. HostingRails said &lt;br&gt; they have nothing block but I&#39;m starting to wonder. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Results: &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://pastie.org/745717&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Magnus is hosted and supported by HostingRails. From their response, &lt;br&gt; they believe that the cap commands are run from my local machine into
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/5ddf1e36627e3407?show_docid=5ddf1e36627e3407</guid>
  <author>
  m...@52nineteen.com
  (Memo)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 15:26:13 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] Re: Deploying Error: `split&#39; called for 440:Fixnum</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/aba82a78979cde80?show_docid=aba82a78979cde80</link>
  <description>
  Can you get a shell on your server even with this? Can you explain &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;HostingRails says that it is a problem when unfuddle tries &lt;br&gt; to connect to their magnus server.&amp;quot; - Unfuddle is also managing your &lt;br&gt; `magnus` server? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Try this: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;$ cd ~ &lt;br&gt; $ mkdir cap_test &lt;br&gt; $ cd cap_test &lt;br&gt; $ echo &amp;quot;role :web, &#39;my-server.com&#39;&amp;quot; &amp;gt; Capfile
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/aba82a78979cde80?show_docid=aba82a78979cde80</guid>
  <author>
  lee.hamb...@gmail.com
  (Lee Hambley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 15:13:28 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Deploying Error: `split&#39; called for 440:Fixnum</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/6aa27b237c034cfa?show_docid=6aa27b237c034cfa</link>
  <description>
  I tried it. I ran a &amp;quot;cap deploy:setup&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;cap deploy:check&amp;quot; but &lt;br&gt; still came up with the same errors. If I do a cap deploy:setup or cap &lt;br&gt; deploy:restart where it doesn&#39;t need unfuddle, is it executing from my &lt;br&gt; machine. HostingRails says that it is a problem when unfuddle tries &lt;br&gt; to connect to their magnus server.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/6aa27b237c034cfa?show_docid=6aa27b237c034cfa</guid>
  <author>
  m...@52nineteen.com
  (Memo)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 15:05:30 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] Re: Rollback deletes wrong release</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/38544e2ff991a6b9/04358c88be078fe0?show_docid=04358c88be078fe0</link>
  <description>
  The solution is to figure out the way that works for your infrastructure to &lt;br&gt; `ls` them in the right way, then you can overload this default: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;set(:releases) { capture(&amp;quot;ls -xt #{releases_path}&amp;quot;).split.rever se } &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Defined in: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://github.com/capistrano/capistrano/blob/master/lib/capistrano/recipes/deploy.rb#L53&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/38544e2ff991a6b9/04358c88be078fe0?show_docid=04358c88be078fe0</guid>
  <author>
  lee.hamb...@gmail.com
  (Lee Hambley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 15:00:39 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] Re: Deploying Error: `split&#39; called for 440:Fixnum</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/7f230fc0d496706a?show_docid=7f230fc0d496706a</link>
  <description>
  I suspect now then that this is a connection problem from your server, to &lt;br&gt; reach your repository host; please try one thing for me &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;set :deploy_via, :copy &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Then, no such connection is required (hardly a fix, I know - but we can &lt;br&gt; debug some more!) &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;-- Lee Hambley &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Twitter: @leehambley | @capistranorb
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/7f230fc0d496706a?show_docid=7f230fc0d496706a</guid>
  <author>
  lee.hamb...@gmail.com
  (Lee Hambley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 14:54:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] Newcomer Problem</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/5c1bbaec50d3086e/b68470165f5c6a9b?show_docid=b68470165f5c6a9b</link>
  <description>
  If you have no remote repository, you need to set deploy_via, :copy - and &lt;br&gt; jump through some more hoops. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;-- Lee Hambley &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Twitter: @leehambley | @capistranorb
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/5c1bbaec50d3086e/b68470165f5c6a9b?show_docid=b68470165f5c6a9b</guid>
  <author>
  lee.hamb...@gmail.com
  (Lee Hambley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 13:30:30 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Newcomer Problem</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/5c1bbaec50d3086e/5e9f28c6e7a54e14?show_docid=5e9f28c6e7a54e14</link>
  <description>
  Hello all, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Ruby 1.8.6, Capistrano v2.5.10, Git version 1.6.5.1 &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I am attempting to get Capistrano setup and working for the first &lt;br&gt; time. &lt;br&gt; This is very new to me. I am trying to deploy from a local Git &lt;br&gt; repository to my shared host. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;After running &#39;cap deploy:setup&#39; and &#39;cap deploy:check&#39; everything
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/5c1bbaec50d3086e/5e9f28c6e7a54e14?show_docid=5e9f28c6e7a54e14</guid>
  <author>
  mafor...@gmail.com
  (mafordha)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 06:35:48 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] Re: Best Reaper Approach ??</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/c6164d74ab36943b/db5330fd84797a68?show_docid=db5330fd84797a68</link>
  <description>
  That depends on about a million factors. Apache is easier (read: better &lt;br&gt; documented) - don&#39;t optimise by experimenting with nginx until you see what &lt;br&gt; your performance problems are. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;-- Lee Hambley &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Twitter: @leehambley | @capistranorb
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/c6164d74ab36943b/db5330fd84797a68?show_docid=db5330fd84797a68</guid>
  <author>
  lee.hamb...@gmail.com
  (Lee Hambley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 08:37:09 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Rollback deletes wrong release</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/38544e2ff991a6b9/7c62e7f8f735ceb0?show_docid=7c62e7f8f735ceb0</link>
  <description>
  nb. I&#39;ve found that run&#39;ing any command that modifies any release &lt;br&gt; folder or its contents will cause the dodgy timestamp to appear &lt;br&gt; again. So be careful what you do in a :before_update_code task...
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/38544e2ff991a6b9/7c62e7f8f735ceb0?show_docid=7c62e7f8f735ceb0</guid>
  <author>
  streetda...@gmail.com
  (booyah)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 07:28:02 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Deploying Error: `split&#39; called for 440:Fixnum</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/b1d0aea8238c475b?show_docid=b1d0aea8238c475b</link>
  <description>
  I updated the deploy.rb file and ran both cap deploy:setup and cap &lt;br&gt; deploy:check. They both had the same connection issue. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://pastie.org/745062&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/b1d0aea8238c475b?show_docid=b1d0aea8238c475b</guid>
  <author>
  m...@52nineteen.com
  (Memo)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 01:48:55 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Rollback deletes wrong release</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/38544e2ff991a6b9/717b4fe4322d4d4e?show_docid=717b4fe4322d4d4e</link>
  <description>
  I think I&#39;ve been able to solve it by touched the latest release &lt;br&gt; folder after update_code: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;task :after_update_code, :roles =&amp;gt; [:web] do &lt;br&gt; # Sleep may not be needed &lt;br&gt; run &amp;quot;sleep 1&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; run &amp;quot;touch #{latest_release}&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; end &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I deleted all releases and did a number of deploys and rollbacks and
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/38544e2ff991a6b9/717b4fe4322d4d4e?show_docid=717b4fe4322d4d4e</guid>
  <author>
  streetda...@gmail.com
  (booyah)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2009 23:31:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Rollback deletes wrong release</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/38544e2ff991a6b9/5c07e19719820978?show_docid=5c07e19719820978</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;ve come to the same conclusion. I&#39;m not using file-based rails &lt;br&gt; caching. I&#39;m just using it for deploying a PHP site and have &lt;br&gt; overridden a lot of the rails specific tasks in deploy. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;The ordering of the releases from &#39;ls -xt&#39; is the problem, but the &lt;br&gt; reason I think they&#39;re in the wrong order is because of the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/38544e2ff991a6b9/5c07e19719820978?show_docid=5c07e19719820978</guid>
  <author>
  streetda...@gmail.com
  (booyah)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2009 22:58:02 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Best Reaper Approach ??</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/c6164d74ab36943b/2f9f657178daa651?show_docid=2f9f657178daa651</link>
  <description>
  OK I&#39;ll give passenger a try. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;From the passenger docco, i see that you can run passenger with either &lt;br&gt; apache or nginx. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Which one is better ??
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/c6164d74ab36943b/2f9f657178daa651?show_docid=2f9f657178daa651</guid>
  <author>
  akl...@gmail.com
  (Arco)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2009 22:57:54 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] Best Reaper Approach ??</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/c6164d74ab36943b/6a6b11e7808797e2?show_docid=6a6b11e7808797e2</link>
  <description>
  Honesty deploy on Passenger or something else now, Mongrel is out! (We&#39;re &lt;br&gt; actually removing support in the new year, it&#39;ll be available as a plugin &lt;br&gt; after that) &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;If you are goig to use the reapers (I have no experience) - but I suspect &lt;br&gt; you need that plugin (otherwise, the scripts don&#39;t exist)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/c6164d74ab36943b/6a6b11e7808797e2?show_docid=6a6b11e7808797e2</guid>
  <author>
  lee.hamb...@gmail.com
  (Lee Hambley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2009 22:40:47 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Best Reaper Approach ??</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/c6164d74ab36943b/0d60c325e9eb7ae7?show_docid=0d60c325e9eb7ae7</link>
  <description>
  i have a question re: using the reaper script &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;i&#39;m deploying a new app for the 1st time, using the newest version of &lt;br&gt; rails and capistrano &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;should i use the &#39;old style&#39; reaper (I saw a plugin for this) &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;or is there a better replacement for the old style reaper ??
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/c6164d74ab36943b/0d60c325e9eb7ae7?show_docid=0d60c325e9eb7ae7</guid>
  <author>
  akl...@gmail.com
  (Arco)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2009 22:28:13 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] Re: Deploying Error: `split&#39; called for 440:Fixnum</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/a57ce3857367132d?show_docid=a57ce3857367132d</link>
  <description>
  Disable cached copy, and switch to :export or :checkout. Rinse and repeat, &lt;br&gt; did you post this problem previously under another name, its really &lt;br&gt; familiar? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;-- Lee Hambley &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Twitter: @leehambley | @capistranorb
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/a57ce3857367132d?show_docid=a57ce3857367132d</guid>
  <author>
  lee.hamb...@gmail.com
  (Lee Hambley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2009 21:53:06 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Deploying Error: `split&#39; called for 440:Fixnum</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/4ef2a4c405e25aee?show_docid=4ef2a4c405e25aee</link>
  <description>
  It is the entire backtrace. Here is the entire backtrace for cap &lt;br&gt; deploy. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://pastie.org/744772&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;The software has been pushed to the remote repository. In fact, I &lt;br&gt; have multiple changes that have been committed and each shows up in &lt;br&gt; unfuddle and github when I pushed it there. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Thanks for the help.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/4ef2a4c405e25aee?show_docid=4ef2a4c405e25aee</guid>
  <author>
  m...@52nineteen.com
  (Memo)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2009 21:48:22 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] Re: Deploying Error: `split&#39; called for 440:Fixnum</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/7ae5d8f127fa13e7?show_docid=7ae5d8f127fa13e7</link>
  <description>
  And the whole backtrace please? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Also are you certain that the git branch you are deploying has been pushed &lt;br&gt; to your remote repository ? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;( no need to try and embed the things, just paste the links ) &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;-- Lee Hambley &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Twitter: @leehambley | @capistranorb
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/7ae5d8f127fa13e7?show_docid=7ae5d8f127fa13e7</guid>
  <author>
  lee.hamb...@gmail.com
  (Lee Hambley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2009 21:42:19 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Deploying Error: `split&#39; called for 440:Fixnum</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/402b2d0280dfecfb?show_docid=402b2d0280dfecfb</link>
  <description>
  I haven&#39;t really used this so hope it works. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Capfile &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;script src=&#39;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://pastie.org/744761.js&#39;&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/script&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;deploy.rb &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;script src=&#39;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://pastie.org/744750.js&#39;&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/script&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Shell &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;script src=&#39;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://pastie.org/744756.js&#39;&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/script&amp;gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/402b2d0280dfecfb?show_docid=402b2d0280dfecfb</guid>
  <author>
  m...@52nineteen.com
  (Memo)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2009 21:39:48 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] checking the dry-run flag from within a task</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/f670aa063428da63/190a7bd80400fbaf?show_docid=190a7bd80400fbaf</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;m not sure it ever came up that anyone asked about the &amp;quot;local&amp;quot; thing for &lt;br&gt; use with dry-run, I honestly have never used it, I always make my calls with &lt;br&gt; pure ruby. Even then I&#39;m not sure whether or not it honors it. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;The FileUtils class should provide the behavior you need, maybe in this way &lt;br&gt; you can have cap honor the dry run flag, either way - let us know how you
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/f670aa063428da63/190a7bd80400fbaf?show_docid=190a7bd80400fbaf</guid>
  <author>
  lee.hamb...@gmail.com
  (Lee Hambley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2009 21:32:56 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] Deploying Error: `split&#39; called for 440:Fixnum</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/16a43227271c51ae?show_docid=16a43227271c51ae</link>
  <description>
  Please paste code in a Gist/Pastie, and your backtrace (in its entirety) &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;-- Lee Hambley &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Twitter: @leehambley | @capistranorb
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/16a43227271c51ae?show_docid=16a43227271c51ae</guid>
  <author>
  lee.hamb...@gmail.com
  (Lee Hambley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2009 21:27:19 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>checking the dry-run flag from within a task</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/f670aa063428da63/6d096477a7c7b745?show_docid=6d096477a7c7b745</link>
  <description>
  Lo, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I&#39;ve got a highly customised set of tasks that have both local and &lt;br&gt; remote parts to them, when I use the dry-run flag the remote tasks &lt;br&gt; honour the flag, but, obviously, the local tasks don&#39;t honour it. I &lt;br&gt; understand why it is but I would like to do something to change this. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I&#39;ve created a normal ruby method which runs all my local stuff:
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/f670aa063428da63/6d096477a7c7b745?show_docid=6d096477a7c7b745</guid>
  <author>
  pharri...@gmail.com
  (Pharrisee)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2009 19:27:46 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Deploying Error: `split&#39; called for 440:Fixnum</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/21a883d6609788a4?show_docid=21a883d6609788a4</link>
  <description>
  This error was posted before but the solution of going to capistrano &lt;br&gt; 2.5.5 did not work for me. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I am getting this error and I&#39;ve tried several different recipes. It &lt;br&gt; appears to be a problem connecting to my host server. Right now I am &lt;br&gt; running on OS X10.6.1 with capistrano 2.5.10 and net-ssh 2.0.17. I
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/733b21f1c33228b6/21a883d6609788a4?show_docid=21a883d6609788a4</guid>
  <author>
  m...@52nineteen.com
  (Memo)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2009 16:28:30 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] Rollback deletes wrong release</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/38544e2ff991a6b9/9189e7a3a1747fad?show_docid=9189e7a3a1747fad</link>
  <description>
  Are you using file-based rails caching? We have an open bug for that, in a &lt;br&gt; nutshell the `ls -xt` command we use, lists them in the `wrong` order if you &lt;br&gt; are using file caching. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;( this could be an easy fix, but how should we approach it? – thus we &lt;br&gt; haven&#39;t ) &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;-- Lee Hambley &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Twitter: @leehambley | @capistranorb
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/38544e2ff991a6b9/9189e7a3a1747fad?show_docid=9189e7a3a1747fad</guid>
  <author>
  lee.hamb...@gmail.com
  (Lee Hambley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2009 09:56:30 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Rollback deletes wrong release</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/38544e2ff991a6b9/c587fd99e26ed545?show_docid=c587fd99e26ed545</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;ve been introduced to Capistrano by a colleague and must say i&#39;m &lt;br&gt; loving it, however, I&#39;m seeing some strange behaviour with the &lt;br&gt; rollback task: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;for example, lets say I have 3 releases with 1 being the newest and 3 &lt;br&gt; being the oldest. If I do cap deploy:rollback I would expect it to &lt;br&gt; roll back from release 1 to release 2 and release 1 would be deleted.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/38544e2ff991a6b9/c587fd99e26ed545?show_docid=c587fd99e26ed545</guid>
  <author>
  streetda...@gmail.com
  (booyah)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2009 01:24:32 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Deploy from git repository with multiple projects</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/39f9856fbbcffe74/575766c7b07f4f36?show_docid=575766c7b07f4f36</link>
  <description>
  On Dec 10, 9:47 am, theturingmachine &amp;lt;theturingmach...@gmail.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I think there&#39;s a more fundamental issue here. This might be more work &lt;br&gt; than you want to take on, but you should really think about &lt;br&gt; restructuring these apps into independent repos. Shared code should go &lt;br&gt; into plugins or gems, each with their own repo.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/39f9856fbbcffe74/575766c7b07f4f36?show_docid=575766c7b07f4f36</guid>
  <author>
  sc...@scottjohnson.org
  (Scott Johnson)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2009 18:24:49 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] Deploy from git repository with multiple projects</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/39f9856fbbcffe74/597676e83677d66c?show_docid=597676e83677d66c</link>
  <description>
  Rory, great - I hope there&#39;s a contribution in it somewhere! It would be a &lt;br&gt; real shame not to share community knowledge – there&#39;s not enough people &lt;br&gt; hacking on the internals like you are doing! &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;-- Lee Hambley &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Twitter: @leehambley | @capistranorb
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/39f9856fbbcffe74/597676e83677d66c?show_docid=597676e83677d66c</guid>
  <author>
  lee.hamb...@gmail.com
  (Lee Hambley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2009 20:15:30 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] Deploy from git repository with multiple projects</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/39f9856fbbcffe74/c81cd7590e390880?show_docid=c81cd7590e390880</link>
  <description>
  On 10 Dec 2009, at 17:47, theturingmachine &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I&#39;ve just done something very similar. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;All I did was create a capistrano/modules/recipes structure alongside &lt;br&gt; my deploy.rb and copy the Copy strategy recipe sourcefile into it from &lt;br&gt; the unpacked gem. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;A swift rename later and I had my own strategy, which I then
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/39f9856fbbcffe74/c81cd7590e390880?show_docid=c81cd7590e390880</guid>
  <author>
  r...@deadcrow.net
  (Rory Gibson)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2009 19:49:18 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] Deploy from git repository with multiple projects</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/39f9856fbbcffe74/53dc37850c1984ec?show_docid=53dc37850c1984ec</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;m afraid this is basically impossible (the Git guys argument is that &lt;br&gt; repositories are so cheap, you should not be sharing them) - they mean cheap &lt;br&gt; like overhead, not like hosting charges, but its a fundamental limitation of &lt;br&gt; Git that you can&#39;t easily deploy a &amp;quot;subdirectory&amp;quot; from a repository. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;If you are using the :remote_cache deployment strategy, then you can use the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/39f9856fbbcffe74/53dc37850c1984ec?show_docid=53dc37850c1984ec</guid>
  <author>
  lee.hamb...@gmail.com
  (Lee Hambley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2009 19:55:49 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Deploy from git repository with multiple projects</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/39f9856fbbcffe74/bf5a386e86030b75?show_docid=bf5a386e86030b75</link>
  <description>
  i&#39;m currently migrating a project we had on svn to git. the conversion &lt;br&gt; has been working fine but now we have to change our deploy recipes to &lt;br&gt; use git, the problem I&#39;m having is with our current setup. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;We have only one repostory where we have several apps. what we&#39;re &lt;br&gt; currently doing checking out one of the directories from the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/39f9856fbbcffe74/bf5a386e86030b75?show_docid=bf5a386e86030b75</guid>
  <author>
  theturingmach...@gmail.com
  (theturingmachine)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2009 17:47:02 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] Net::SSH 2.0.16 Net::SSH::AuthenticationFailed</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/e46a320f96331ae8/8e6dbd70d57057aa?show_docid=8e6dbd70d57057aa</link>
  <description>
  The Correct Syntax (straight from the RDocs) is : &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt; Net::SSH.start(&amp;quot;host&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;user&amp;quot;, :password =&amp;gt; &amp;quot;password&amp;quot;) do |ssh| &lt;br&gt; result = ssh.exec!(&amp;quot;ls -l&amp;quot;) &lt;br&gt; puts result &lt;br&gt; end &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;(you send the username as a parameter, password should be part of the &lt;br&gt; options hash.) &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;-- Lee Hambley &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Twitter: @leehambley | @capistranorb
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/e46a320f96331ae8/8e6dbd70d57057aa?show_docid=8e6dbd70d57057aa</guid>
  <author>
  lee.hamb...@gmail.com
  (Lee Hambley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2009 06:25:15 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Net::SSH 2.0.16 Net::SSH::AuthenticationFailed</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/e46a320f96331ae8/e9a6daaa4317c1fe?show_docid=e9a6daaa4317c1fe</link>
  <description>
  I was told folks on this mailing list might be able to help me with &lt;br&gt; this problem. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I&#39;m running ruby 1.9.1p243 and net-ssh 2.0.16 and getting this error &lt;br&gt; trying to connect to a vanilla openssh server on the same LAN: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;lee@lee-hp:~$ irb &lt;br&gt; irb(main):001:0&amp;gt; require &#39;net/ssh&#39; &lt;br&gt; =&amp;gt; true &lt;br&gt; irb(main):002:0&amp;gt; Net::SSH.start
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/e46a320f96331ae8/e9a6daaa4317c1fe?show_docid=e9a6daaa4317c1fe</guid>
  <author>
  lhughe...@gmail.com
  (lee)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2009 02:38:34 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] Weird error when running deploy script with gateway</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/6968f70a52342332/69fdc526c7515a1e?show_docid=69fdc526c7515a1e</link>
  <description>
  Please paste all the information we ask for on the group homepage, (use your &lt;br&gt; imagination, we don&#39;t need all of it for this) &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Anything else strange about your configuration? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;-- Lee Hambley &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Twitter: @leehambley | @capistranorb
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/6968f70a52342332/69fdc526c7515a1e?show_docid=69fdc526c7515a1e</guid>
  <author>
  lee.hamb...@gmail.com
  (Lee Hambley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2009 17:33:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Weird error when running deploy script with gateway</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/6968f70a52342332/a237d4bc3eb22a33?show_docid=a237d4bc3eb22a33</link>
  <description>
  I am trying to run a deploy script with a gateway, and I&#39;m getting a &lt;br&gt; weird error. I&#39;m not sure if it&#39;s the script or my server &lt;br&gt; configuration. Does anyone have any hints? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt; servers: [&amp;quot;qa&amp;quot;] &lt;br&gt; * establishing connection to gateway &#39;xx.xx.xx.xx:9022&#39; &lt;br&gt; * Creating gateway using xx.xx.xx.xx:9022 &lt;br&gt; * establishing connection to `qa&#39; via gateway
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/6968f70a52342332/a237d4bc3eb22a33?show_docid=a237d4bc3eb22a33</guid>
  <author>
  man...@acceleweb.com
  (mrmanishs)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2009 16:16:35 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] Re: Task execution based on :primary flag</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/9a52415f1dd94701/90b684b79fc40e82?show_docid=90b684b79fc40e82</link>
  <description>
  Either/or 0 lets take the dicussion to the lighthouse app though -- I think &lt;br&gt; something like another option to task would be nice and clean: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;task :whatever, :raise_on_empty_roles =&amp;gt; false do &lt;br&gt; # whatever &lt;br&gt; end &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;-- Lee Hambley
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/9a52415f1dd94701/90b684b79fc40e82?show_docid=90b684b79fc40e82</guid>
  <author>
  lee.hamb...@gmail.com
  (Lee Hambley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2009 17:27:55 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] Re: Task execution based on :primary flag</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/9a52415f1dd94701/2a103c6161eebbb9?show_docid=2a103c6161eebbb9</link>
  <description>
  That&#39;s a good point Lee, at the time I was in a rush and I just &lt;br&gt; scratched my own itch. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I&#39;ll review that monkey patch and wrap the functionality with a &lt;br&gt; variable so that you can enable it with something like: &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;set :allow_empty_roles, true &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;in your deploy.rb &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Do you prefer pull requests or patches?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/9a52415f1dd94701/2a103c6161eebbb9?show_docid=2a103c6161eebbb9</guid>
  <author>
  donno...@gmail.com
  (Donovan Bray)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2009 16:44:44 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Task execution based on :primary flag</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/9a52415f1dd94701/be3b298e4617c930?show_docid=be3b298e4617c930</link>
  <description>
  Donovan, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;You&#39;re a life saver! That solved the problem perfectly. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Thanks again!
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/9a52415f1dd94701/be3b298e4617c930?show_docid=be3b298e4617c930</guid>
  <author>
  justin.di...@gmail.com
  (jmadtech)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2009 01:01:44 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] Re: Task execution based on :primary flag</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/9a52415f1dd94701/df638dd5f196b903?show_docid=df638dd5f196b903</link>
  <description>
  Donoval, &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;You didn&#39;t feel like submitting a patch? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;-- Lee Hambley &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Twitter: @leehambley | @capistranorb
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/9a52415f1dd94701/df638dd5f196b903?show_docid=df638dd5f196b903</guid>
  <author>
  lee.hamb...@gmail.com
  (Lee Hambley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2009 21:38:35 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] capistrano deployment</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/25e22eb3a844fadb/3d99ae9b1f790258?show_docid=3d99ae9b1f790258</link>
  <description>
  Josh, the deploy branch made during deploy of a remote cache is normal, and &lt;br&gt; should be switched to master when the deploy is done. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;-- Lee Hambley &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Twitter: @leehambley | @capistranorb
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/25e22eb3a844fadb/3d99ae9b1f790258?show_docid=3d99ae9b1f790258</guid>
  <author>
  lee.hamb...@gmail.com
  (Lee Hambley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2009 21:37:51 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [capistrano] capistrano deployment</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/25e22eb3a844fadb/3ad8ad1af94d8d37?show_docid=3ad8ad1af94d8d37</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;ve had this happen to me, I found that it was the remote_cache had &lt;br&gt; been corrupted. Deleting the remote_cache on the server and &lt;br&gt; redeploying resolved the problem for me.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/capistrano/browse_frm/thread/25e22eb3a844fadb/3ad8ad1af94d8d37?show_docid=3ad8ad1af94d8d37</guid>
  <author>
  donno...@gmail.com
  (Donovan Bray)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2009 20:36:59 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
