<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc</id>
  <title type="text">cam.misc Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Cambridge, UK, misc -- spin off others as need is shown.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/cam.misc/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="cam.misc feed"/>
  <updated>2009-11-28T02:05:47Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.co.uk" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Alex Selby</name>
  <email>alex.se...@remove.pobox.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-28T02:05:47Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/a643deaa95d8a7a3?show_docid=a643deaa95d8a7a3</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/a643deaa95d8a7a3?show_docid=a643deaa95d8a7a3"/>
  <title type="text">Re: &quot;Durability&quot; under sale of goods act</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Excuse me for replying to myself, but thinking about it, I am a bit more &lt;br&gt; annoyed about it than I implied above because it&#39;s this kind of price &lt;br&gt; distortion (undercharging for product, overcharging for consumables) &lt;br&gt; that encourages waste. (Artificially high incentive to throw away and &lt;br&gt; start again.)
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Alex Selby</name>
  <email>alex.se...@remove.pobox.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-28T01:51:07Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/d9374d81056119be?show_docid=d9374d81056119be</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/d9374d81056119be?show_docid=d9374d81056119be"/>
  <title type="text">Re: &quot;Durability&quot; under sale of goods act</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  It doesn&#39;t apply to all models, and it looks like something they might &lt;br&gt; be bringing in for new ones, so you might be safe. The trick is they &lt;br&gt; claim that &amp;quot;unauthorised&amp;quot; batteries can be a &amp;quot;safety hazard&amp;quot;, so &lt;br&gt; they&#39;ve gone the way of printer ink manufacturers and somehow chipped &lt;br&gt; their batteries. &lt;br&gt; A couple of months ago I was considering buying a DMC-TZ7 (= DMC-ZS3
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Phil W Lee at dot dot</name>
  <email></email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-28T01:43:45Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/1344d56a157ec2e0?show_docid=1344d56a157ec2e0</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/1344d56a157ec2e0?show_docid=1344d56a157ec2e0"/>
  <title type="text">Re: &quot;Durability&quot; under sale of goods act</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;quot;Fevric J. Glandules&amp;quot; &amp;lt;f...@invalid.invalid&amp;gt; considered Fri, 27 Nov &lt;br&gt; Apart from the carefully engineered in failure to encourage repeat &lt;br&gt; sales.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Duncan Wood</name>
  <email>nntpn...@dmx512.co.uk</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-28T00:48:17Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/d77d9647099f34d4?show_docid=d77d9647099f34d4</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/d77d9647099f34d4?show_docid=d77d9647099f34d4"/>
  <title type="text">Re: &quot;Durability&quot; under sale of goods act</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:11:54 -0000, Phil W Lee &amp;lt;phil lee-family me &amp;lt;&amp;quot;uk&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; With a five year guarantee? &lt;br&gt; I don&#39;t remember there being a large supply of cheap functional 2nd hand &lt;br&gt; microwaves when I was a student.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Jon Green</name>
  <email>jo...@deadspam.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-28T00:22:03Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/ba7a5ac50db88ee0?show_docid=ba7a5ac50db88ee0</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/ba7a5ac50db88ee0?show_docid=ba7a5ac50db88ee0"/>
  <title type="text">Re: &quot;Durability&quot; under sale of goods act</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Not sure what you mean. I got a DMC-FZ28 last year, just after they&#39;d &lt;br&gt; come onto the market, and aftermarket batteries were already available &lt;br&gt; (in fact, I got one in the accessories bundle). &lt;br&gt; Oh, and it&#39;s an excellent camera. Weaned me off Olympus! (Well that, &lt;br&gt; and Olympus&#39; past tendency to need xD cards when no-one else much uses
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Guy Snape</name>
  <email>g...@snapefamily.theobvious.org.uk</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-28T00:17:41Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/f5388c7c6e855649?show_docid=f5388c7c6e855649</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/f5388c7c6e855649?show_docid=f5388c7c6e855649"/>
  <title type="text">Re: &quot;Durability&quot; under sale of goods act</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I have to say, our panasonic dvd recorder conked out after just under &lt;br&gt; two years. Thank goodness I bought it from Robert Sayle - they gave me a &lt;br&gt; full refund which paid for a humax hdr. :-) &lt;br&gt; - g.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Paul Bird</name>
  <email>p...@nospamcamtutor.co.uk</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-27T22:47:33Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/00465b266b085863?show_docid=00465b266b085863</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/00465b266b085863?show_docid=00465b266b085863"/>
  <title type="text">Re: &quot;Durability&quot; under sale of goods act</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  No I can&#39;t. I think they&#39;d laugh in your face and say their goods will &lt;br&gt; last that long anyway, and yes if you want to bet that they would put &lt;br&gt; that in writing there&#39;s a tenner on the table I&#39;ll never have to pay. &lt;br&gt; BTW I well remember when microwaves suddenly started appearing for £35 &lt;br&gt; and I thought that&#39;s just bloody silly, you won&#39;t catch me buying one of
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Alex Selby</name>
  <email>alex.se...@remove.pobox.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-27T22:35:21Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/cb7b6bc7d4448709?show_docid=cb7b6bc7d4448709</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/cb7b6bc7d4448709?show_docid=cb7b6bc7d4448709"/>
  <title type="text">Re: &quot;Durability&quot; under sale of goods act</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I agree. I&#39;ve recently upgraded from a Panasonic microwave to another &lt;br&gt; Panasonic. I&#39;ve had the old one for about 10+ years and it still works &lt;br&gt; pretty well, though it sometimes rattles now while it&#39;s cooking. (If &lt;br&gt; anyone wants to take it off my hands for a nominal fee, then they&#39;re &lt;br&gt; welcome to it! It&#39;s 800W, cream coloured, smallish.)
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Michael Kilpatrick</name>
  <email>mich...@mtkilpatrick.spamfsnet.co.uk</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-27T22:23:36Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/54a13e840a6cebe2?show_docid=54a13e840a6cebe2</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/54a13e840a6cebe2?show_docid=54a13e840a6cebe2"/>
  <title type="text">Re: &quot;Durability&quot; under sale of goods act</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  So, you can&#39;t picture Panasonic getting all het up about legislation &lt;br&gt; that might see a greatly increased statutory warranty, are you saying? &lt;br&gt; And that you don&#39;t imagine that Panasonic&#39;s products would have to &lt;br&gt; increase much in price in order to account for such a regime? &lt;br&gt; Michael
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Fevric J. Glandules</name>
  <email>f...@invalid.invalid</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-27T21:45:13Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/445b79e5a6529ad9?show_docid=445b79e5a6529ad9</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/445b79e5a6529ad9?show_docid=445b79e5a6529ad9"/>
  <title type="text">Re: &quot;Durability&quot; under sale of goods act</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I think that at the Argos Value end of things, it&#39;s *all* about price.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Paul Bird</name>
  <email>p...@nospamcamtutor.co.uk</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-27T20:23:37Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/84b75d05b71b9ebc?show_docid=84b75d05b71b9ebc</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/84b75d05b71b9ebc?show_docid=84b75d05b71b9ebc"/>
  <title type="text">Re: &quot;Durability&quot; under sale of goods act</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  I&#39;ve been reading this thread in disbelief. Practically every &lt;br&gt; electrical good we&#39;ve got in the house is from Panasonic, they work &lt;br&gt; well, they last, they&#39;re not unduly expensive, they are well designed, &lt;br&gt; from memory CRT TV, DVD/Recorder, telephones, microwave, breadmaker &lt;br&gt; (superb) I&#39;ll leave it there.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Mark Goodge</name>
  <email>use...@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-27T20:20:29Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/3e2e4539209a3c10/a8972e9c85443725?show_docid=a8972e9c85443725</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/3e2e4539209a3c10/a8972e9c85443725?show_docid=a8972e9c85443725"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Phoned self on BT ?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:52:34 +0000, Roland Perry put finger to &lt;br&gt; keyboard and typed: &lt;br&gt; What really matters is how a court would choose to read it. Unless you &lt;br&gt; can offer some evidence to suggest that they wouldn&#39;t read it that &lt;br&gt; way, I&#39;m inlined to think that they&#39;d agree with me. And, as I said &lt;br&gt; previously, my own experience is that my bank agrees with me.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Mark Goodge</name>
  <email>use...@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-27T20:16:36Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/965aa405739e6c19?show_docid=965aa405739e6c19</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/965aa405739e6c19?show_docid=965aa405739e6c19"/>
  <title type="text">Re: &quot;Durability&quot; under sale of goods act</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:16:59 -0600, Ben C put finger to keyboard and &lt;br&gt; typed: &lt;br&gt; In that, I agree with you. The other thing you can&#39;t seem to find &lt;br&gt; these days is a microwave with a full keypad, instead of either a knob &lt;br&gt; or some stupid press-five-times-for-five-minu tes thing. I&#39;ve got a &lt;br&gt; (relatively cheap) Saisho microwave that I bought from Dixons (as was)
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Mark Goodge</name>
  <email>use...@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-27T20:08:05Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/76e2a0ba0fbb4e4a?show_docid=76e2a0ba0fbb4e4a</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/76e2a0ba0fbb4e4a?show_docid=76e2a0ba0fbb4e4a"/>
  <title type="text">Re: &quot;Durability&quot; under sale of goods act</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:41:39 +0000, Phil W Lee &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;phil(at)lee-family(dot)me(dot )uk&amp;gt; put finger to keyboard and typed: &lt;br&gt; It clearly isn&#39;t, given my experience. &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m certainly not rich. Most of my current stuff was bought while I &lt;br&gt; was working for a charity and on a salary well below the national &lt;br&gt; average. I&#39;m now earning far more than that, and in a position to
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Mark Goodge</name>
  <email>use...@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-27T20:00:50Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/361fe4ecb9738207?show_docid=361fe4ecb9738207</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/cam.misc/browse_thread/thread/545e914716471587/361fe4ecb9738207?show_docid=361fe4ecb9738207"/>
  <title type="text">Re: &quot;Durability&quot; under sale of goods act</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:13:56 +0000 (UTC), Fevric J. Glandules put &lt;br&gt; finger to keyboard and typed: &lt;br&gt; No, because at the moment the law only reqires goods to be of &lt;br&gt; sufficient quality for the purpose for which they are sold. I think &lt;br&gt; that&#39;s reasonable. I&#39;m not opposed to consumer protection legislation &lt;br&gt; per se, only where it acts against the best interests of the tyical
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
