I have to say that I am extremely disappointed in the current attitude
of open communities. I feel that the current removal of alternitive
sights is contrary to freedom of information and what I considered to
be the ethos of discussion. I formally request that all links are
reinstated, I am aware that you were invited to join the other NEW
DISCUSSION SIGHT. It is becoming ever more obvious that this sight is
not about discussion (NO ONE REPLIES). I would be gratefull if you
could upload a copy of the relevant complaint procedures and details
of who will hear these complaints.
I have not kept copies of this current debate forum so would be
gratefull if you could forward me details of what has been removed,
including full details, as to exactly what information is elligible
for this sight.
I once again request that Yourselves, Communities First and all
Partners involved is this project reconsider your policy of silence.
Please answer my previous questions as I feel that in this point in
time I am openly being excluded from this discussion and that this
consultation is being delivered in such a way that is innappropriate
and miss leading.
As I am aware you seem to struggle with using this form of media, you
can either e mail me or request my contact details from Garry Jones,
Caia Park Communities First.
I have one further question, relevant to my complaint, Can I ask
exactly who is considerd responsible for this decision and in what way
did it look like the other site was associated with Open Communities.
|
