Google Mail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion [OT] Who's MP is the most expensive?

View Parsed - Show only message text

Received: by 10.210.119.5 with SMTP id r5mr1043399ebc.13.1245344817241;
        Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:06:57 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <bnmlist-boun...@brightonnewmedia.org>
Received: from sturges.wessexnetworks.com (sturges.vs.man.wessexnetworks.com [89.16.162.53])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 15si428640ewy.0.2009.06.18.10.06.57;
        Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:06:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 89.16.162.53 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of bnmlist-boun...@brightonnewmedia.org) client-ip=89.16.162.53;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 89.16.162.53 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of bnmlist-boun...@brightonnewmedia.org) smtp.mail=bnmlist-boun...@brightonnewmedia.org
Received: from sturges.wessexnetworks.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sturges.wessexnetworks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F41112D92AC;
	Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:06:56 +0100 (BST)
Received: from mail-ew0-f214.google.com (mail-ew0-f214.google.com
	[209.85.219.214])
	by sturges.wessexnetworks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED24E12D837B
	for <bnml...@brightonnewmedia.org>;
	Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:06:53 +0100 (BST)
Received: by ewy10 with SMTP id 10so1607465ewy.23
	for <bnml...@brightonnewmedia.org>;
	Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:06:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.210.29.9 with SMTP id c9mr4680593ebc.72.1245344813204;
	Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:06:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?192.168.1.6? (cpc1-brig12-0-0-cust968.brig.cable.ntl.com
	[82.24.11.201])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm131054eyx.13.2009.06.18.10.06.52
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
	Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <3597E5B6-B849-4E37-ABDD-53EE2C3AA75D@chrisbillett.net>
From: Chris Billett <ch...@chrisbillett.net>
To: Brighton New Media <bnml...@brightonnewmedia.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090618161035.GG2908@femme.catnip.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:06:51 +0100
References: <3eddb6c70906180349j5e39e9c4h7db65dd470c8dfe9@mail.gmail.com>
	<c570b2800906180407k1de94d68qf0b0691d96167...@mail.gmail.com>
	<BAY128-DS35947670D570F901A423BAF...@phx.gbl>
	<4A3A62F3.4050...@gmail.com>
	<20090618161035.GG2...@femme.catnip.org.uk>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
Subject: Re: [BNM] [OT] Who's MP is the most expensive?
X-BeenThere: bnml...@brightonnewmedia.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Brighton New Media <bnml...@brightonnewmedia.org>
List-Id: Brighton New Media <bnmlist.brightonnewmedia.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.wessexnetworks.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bnmlist>,
	<mailto:bnmlist-requ...@brightonnewmedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.wessexnetworks.com/pipermail/bnmlist>
List-Post: <mailto:bnml...@brightonnewmedia.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bnmlist-requ...@brightonnewmedia.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.wessexnetworks.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bnmlist>,
	<mailto:bnmlist-requ...@brightonnewmedia.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: bnmlist-boun...@brightonnewmedia.org
Errors-To: bnmlist-boun...@brightonnewmedia.org


On 18 Jun 2009, at 17:10, David Pashley wrote:

> You may want to look up how stable their government has been over the
> last few hundred years. Since 1794, they've had two empires, two
> kingdoms and five republics. Not entirely a great way to run a  
> country.

If you think we're changed any less, I suggest you study history*. I  
am, of course, impressed by your wikipedia skills nonetheless! You  
wield the sword of Googled facts clumsily, though. France's government  
has probably displayed the most progressive political Darwinism  
imaginable over the course of time, mostly due to its people's refusal  
to lie down and be shit all over (which, when compared to us, makes us  
look like a moronic island of political scat fetishists). It's quite  
admirable.

> You don't vote for any Prime Minister. You vote for an MP. One of  
> those
> MPs is going to be Prime Minister. If you didn't know that Gordon  
> Brown
> was the heir-apparent in 2005, you clearly weren't paying attention  
> and
> have no right to complain now.


If you don't think that the figurehead and leadership of your MPs  
political party is key and relevant to your voting then you really are  
a mug, but I may be misunderstanding what you're suggesting.

Anyway, sorry, saucer of milk, table two n' all that... but if you're  
going to try and out-smug everyone on the list in nearly every thread,  
at least get your facts right, and your opinions a bit more logically  
though through. I get really bothered by people who tell other people  
their opinions are irrelevant if they're not an expert on a subject,  
then insist that they're an expert on every single thing they can look  
up online.

C 'I've not normally got this much free time' B

*I did, before you ask, and covered at least two of the republics, one  
empire and the puppet government in some depth.
-- 

BNM Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://www.brightonnewmedia.org/options/bnmlist

BNM powered by Wessex Networks:
http://www.wessexnetworks.com

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google