Message from discussion
Fw: [Quantum Owners] Re: Fw: NEW VIRUS
Received: by 10.114.60.19 with SMTP id i19mr9157123waa.10.1205660135568;
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 02:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <ham...@blimps.fsnet.co.uk>
Received: from smtp3.freeserve.com (smtp3.wanadoo.co.uk [193.252.22.156])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v36si29637048wah.3.2008.03.16.02.35.34;
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 02:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.252.22.156 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ham...@blimps.fsnet.co.uk) client-ip=193.252.22.156;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 193.252.22.156 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ham...@blimps.fsnet.co.uk) smtp.mail=ham...@blimps.fsnet.co.uk
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf3207.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8CDAD7000086;
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 10:35:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from EMAC (user-514feb8a.l4.c4.dsl.pol.co.uk [81.79.235.138])
by mwinf3207.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 4682B7000082;
Sun, 16 Mar 2008 10:35:33 +0100 (CET)
X-ME-UUID: 20080316093533288.4682B7000...@mwinf3207.me.freeserve.com
Message-ID: <006301c88749$14287fe0$0a01a8c0@EMAC>
From: "Hamish Freeman" <ham...@blimps.fsnet.co.uk>
To: <"Undisclosed-Recipient:;"@me.freeserve.com>
Subject: Fw: [Quantum Owners] Re: Fw: NEW VIRUS
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 09:35:30 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0060_01C88749.134F8500"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0060_01C88749.134F8500
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Having passed this on to various groups, I received this back from a =
"sage" in such matters. As it is #1 on the Snopes list, choose which =
URL you believe!
Re New Virus:
Sorry Hamish, but this is a very old hoax...
http://www.hoax-slayer.com/postcard-virus-hoax.shtml
Hamish Freeman wrote:
> This one has been doing the rounds locally so thought that it was=20
> worth passing on.=20
> =20
> Checked SNOPES and it is genuine - see=20
> http://www.snopes.com/computer/virus/postcard.asp
> =20
> Hamish
------=_NextPart_000_0060_01C88749.134F8500
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16608" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#fffdce>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Having passed this on to various =
groups, I received=20
this back from a "sage" in such matters. As it is #1 on the Snopes =
list,=20
choose which URL you believe!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> Re New Virus:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV> Sorry Hamish, but this is a very old =
hoax...<BR><BR><FONT=20
face=3DArial size=3D2> </FONT><A=20
href=3D"http://www.hoax-slayer.com/postcard-virus-hoax.shtml">http://www.=
hoax-slayer.com/postcard-virus-hoax.shtml</A><BR><BR> =20
Hamish Freeman wrote:<BR> > This one has been doing the =
rounds=20
locally so thought that it was <BR> > worth passing on.=20
<BR> > <BR> > Checked SNOPES and it =
is=20
genuine - see <BR> > <A=20
href=3D"http://www.snopes.com/computer/virus/postcard.asp">http://www.sno=
pes.com/computer/virus/postcard.asp</A><BR> =20
> <BR> > Hamish</DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0060_01C88749.134F8500--
|
