Hi, my girlfriend MAY CONSIDER getting a scooter for transportation in the city. Is there any wisdom to this? I suggested a "real bike", because I've heard scooters were actually more dangerous. She is "afraid" of shifting gears (though strangely, she drives stick shift in her car). I guess she thinks it'll be confusing to have all hands and feet occupied with a bikes various controls. My arguments were
1) Small wheels fit in small holes 2) No power to escape danger 3) Wierd balance due to wierd seating (feet on platform, you aren't "forced" into a naturally balanced position, like on a bike 4) People with scooters think they are less dangerous, and wear skirts, suits etc, and a helmet. Not even bothering with leathers. Though the speeds may be lower, a wipe out is a wipe out and your skin is no less resistant to asphalt just because you are on a scooter. 5) Less visibility on a scooter than on a bike.
Did I forget something, or am I TOTALLY wrong on this safety issue. Also, I don't know, but don't you shift gears on a scooter? What is that left hand lever for then?
Vincerama
PS. Thanks in advance
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
vincer...@my-deja.com wrote in message <7k3k0q$t...@nnrp1.deja.com>... >Hi, my girlfriend MAY CONSIDER getting a scooter for transportation in >the city. Is there any wisdom to this? I suggested a "real bike", >because I've heard scooters were actually more dangerous. She is >"afraid" of shifting gears (though strangely, she drives stick shift in >her car). I guess she thinks it'll be confusing to have all hands and >feet occupied with a bikes various controls. My arguments were
>1) Small wheels fit in small holes
True. It never hurts to pay attention to the road. :)
>2) No power to escape danger
Depends on the scooter and the speeds... For in town traffic, you don't need much motor to accelerate quickly up to 40.
>3) Wierd balance due to wierd seating (feet on platform, you aren't >"forced" into a naturally balanced position, like on a bike
Sit on a scooter. It's weird to you cause you ride a bike. The weight is more on the back wheel because of the "step through" area on a scooter. The scooter still has a low center of gravity (often lower than a motorbike) and rounded tires. It corners in the same way, it just feels weird. The seating position is similar to a cruiser bike, (forward pegs) but with the motor under your bum.
>4) People with scooters think they are less dangerous, and wear skirts, >suits etc, and a helmet. Not even bothering with leathers. Though the >speeds may be lower, a wipe out is a wipe out and your skin is no less >resistant to asphalt just because you are on a scooter.
That's a function of the rider, not the machine.
>5) Less visibility on a scooter than on a bike.
Bright helmets and jackets and your more visible than most bikes. (How many people have black everything for their riding gear?)
A thing to consider is that a lot of scooters are a bit narrower, which makes it easier to thread traffic (if that's what she's going to be doing.)
Take her to a MSF course. They ride on little bikes, teach shifting, and even if she goes with an automatic scooter, she'll be far better off having taken the course. And she'll have had a chance to play with a "real bike" in a fun and safe manner. It'll give her a better informed decision to make.
And don't give her grief if she picks a scooter over a bike. :) Just help her have fun riding it safely. I rode a little 125 in highschool and it was fine for in-town traffic. If she's never going to take it on the highway, a scoot should do fine.
Plus it's a "gateway drug" situation. If she starts with something she feels comfortable handling and is easy to deal with, she may be tooling along on a Goldwing or a Sportster in a few years..... ;)
I was going to help you sell the idea of why a bike is better than a scooter. I learned on a Vespa 90, way back in 1964, at the age of 14. It served its purpose, but my main complaints had to do with those small wheels, and the horrible trailing link front suspension that produced a wicked dive, under hard braking. The small wheels are a problem, not only with chuck holes and angled railroad tracks (almost killed myself with the latter!), but they lack a lot of the gyroscopic stability we unconciously take for granted on larger-wheeled bikes.
However, I must agree with Scrubbo, on this one. The two most important things are that she be comfortable with her decision. (Maybe you can help her steer toward a model of scooter that will have fewer of the problems mentioned above). The MSF course is an absolutely excellent suggestion, and nowadays, I wouldn't even think of encouraging ANYONE to begin riding on two wheels without it! Maybe you'll get lucky, and she will see the wisdom of larger wheels. If she already drives a stick, the shifting fear will disappear almost immediately in the class, and hopefully, it will all be downhill from there. The one thing you could seriously screw up on would be to try real hard to convince her of anything! Let the class do it for you, naturally. It shouldn't be hard to get her to see the wisdom of taking the class. The statistics should convince her, as well as the ability to avoid the dreaded DMV riding test (play up the dread a little!)
I own several motorcycles but ride the scooters in the city. Not all scooters have narrow tires. A ZUMA has the same width tires as a Harley. Top speed is 40mph but off the line they are fairly quick. Plus a 2 stroker like a ZUMA can make it up almost any hill. They can be modified to increase speed. They corner very well. My wife used to ride motorcycles and feels more comfortable on a ZUMA
<vincer...@my-deja.com> wrote in message news:7k3k0q$t2$1@nnrp1.deja.com... > Hi, my girlfriend MAY CONSIDER getting a scooter for transportation in > the city. Is there any wisdom to this? I suggested a "real bike", > because I've heard scooters were actually more dangerous. She is > "afraid" of shifting gears (though strangely, she drives stick shift in > her car). I guess she thinks it'll be confusing to have all hands and > feet occupied with a bikes various controls. My arguments were
> 1) Small wheels fit in small holes > 2) No power to escape danger > 3) Wierd balance due to wierd seating (feet on platform, you aren't > "forced" into a naturally balanced position, like on a bike > 4) People with scooters think they are less dangerous, and wear skirts, > suits etc, and a helmet. Not even bothering with leathers. Though the > speeds may be lower, a wipe out is a wipe out and your skin is no less > resistant to asphalt just because you are on a scooter. > 5) Less visibility on a scooter than on a bike.
> Did I forget something, or am I TOTALLY wrong on this safety issue. > Also, I don't know, but don't you shift gears on a scooter? What is > that left hand lever for then?
> Vincerama
> PS. Thanks in advance
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ > Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
When I visited Italy a few months ago, I saw an incredible variety of "scooters." From what I could tell, the most popular models had substantially larger diameter wheels that most of the scoots available in the U.S. I would guess they were 15" of 16" diameter, but with relatively narrow tires. Some of the scooters were downright beautifully styled. And this from a guy who never even gave scooters a second glance before.
For the states, however, unless I lived and drove only in a city setting, a small displacement motorcycle would be preferable to me. Some of the small "cruisers" like the 535 Virago or 600 Shadow have really low seats, are very light and easy to handle, but could still serve as real transportation and are highway legal. Don't forget the GS500E, or even a 250 Ninja, both of which can be found used for less than the cost of a new scooter.
Vince, I don't think you need to be too concerned.
I know someone riding an 80cc Honda scooter in "the city" and she's quite happy with it. She travels all the way from 3rd Ave to deep in the financial district.
That scoot can go 42mph with my big butt and probably faster for her, since most women are 60lbs lighter than me.
Potholes? Alert eyes, a firm grip on the bars, and some riding experience always seem to work.
I'm not so sure about there being less visibility on a scoot. It seems okay to me.
Right, most scooter riders don't wear leathers, except for in the bedroom, but that's another story.
Yes, you don't shift gears on the Japanese scooters. It's easier than riding a bicycle. Your left hand has nothing to do and simply goes along for the ride.
At the risk of sounding like a commercial...I rent scooters on 6 month contracts and she/you might like to rent to see if it's something right for her. Drop me an email, if you'd like more details.
Scooters are so much fun, easy to park, and easy to toss around on the road that you just might become a scooter enthusiast, too!
Over and out...Doug, Oakland, Elite 150, d...@juno.com
vincer...@my-deja.com wrote in message <7k3k0q$t...@nnrp1.deja.com>... >Hi, my girlfriend MAY CONSIDER getting a scooter for transportation in >the city. Is there any wisdom to this? I suggested a "real bike", >because I've heard scooters were actually more dangerous. She is >"afraid" of shifting gears (though strangely, she drives stick shift in >her car). I guess she thinks it'll be confusing to have all hands and >feet occupied with a bikes various controls. My arguments were
>1) Small wheels fit in small holes >2) No power to escape danger >3) Wierd balance due to wierd seating (feet on platform, you aren't >"forced" into a naturally balanced position, like on a bike >4) People with scooters think they are less dangerous, and wear skirts, >suits etc, and a helmet. Not even bothering with leathers. Though the >speeds may be lower, a wipe out is a wipe out and your skin is no less >resistant to asphalt just because you are on a scooter. >5) Less visibility on a scooter than on a bike.
>Did I forget something, or am I TOTALLY wrong on this safety issue. >Also, I don't know, but don't you shift gears on a scooter? What is >that left hand lever for then?
>Vincerama
>PS. Thanks in advance
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ >Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Scooters are great. I ride a 200cc Vespa. I think it is as safe, if not safer than my motorcycle. It is able to travel over 70 miles per hour. It has a zippy 2 stroke motor that out accelerates the majority of things on the road. It's lightweight body and tight turning radius make it perfect for intercity travel. Sitting upright is comfortable and allows an excellent view of the road. I don't see how a scooter is less visible than me on my motorcycle. My scooter does have gears and a clutch, but it is very easy to use. The smaller wheels haven't really been an issue during my 5 years of ownership.
vincer...@my-deja.com wrote: > Hi, my girlfriend MAY CONSIDER getting a scooter for transportation in > the city. Is there any wisdom to this? I suggested a "real bike", > because I've heard scooters were actually more dangerous. She is > "afraid" of shifting gears (though strangely, she drives stick shift in > her car). I guess she thinks it'll be confusing to have all hands and > feet occupied with a bikes various controls. My arguments were
> 1) Small wheels fit in small holes. > 2) No power to escape danger (not true, scooter although small in size > don't lack power) > 3) Wierd balance due to wierd seating (feet on platform, you aren't > "forced" into a naturally balanced position, like on a bike (You sit > upright not on your head!, Scooters are like bicycles with a motor) > 4) People with scooters think they are less dangerous, and wear skirts, > suits etc, and a helmet. Not even bothering with leathers. Though the > speeds may be lower, a wipe out is a wipe out and your skin is no less > resistant to asphalt just because you are on a scooter. This is still the > responsibility of the rider. I have seen all types of motorcycle riders > with less than adequate protection.
> 5) Less visibility on a scooter than on a bike. (i fail to see how a > scooter is less visible than a motorcycle)
> Did I forget something, or am I TOTALLY wrong on this safety issue. > Also, I don't know, but don't you shift gears on a scooter? What is > that left hand lever for then?
> Vincerama
> PS. Thanks in advance
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ > Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
despite claims to the contrary, I don't see how you can get around the problems of the donut sized wheels, and the matching brakes. With the terrible state of roads these days, I'll take all the rubber I can get. And I love my 17/18 wheels.
The scoots do have the advantage of being nearly maintenence free, and parents seem far more accepting of them (misguided as it may be). -- Jason O'Rourke j...@best.com www.jor.com '96 BMW r850R last dive: June 13th, Pescadero Wash Rocks (Carmel), 46 mins at 64ft max
>Potholes? Alert eyes, a firm grip on the bars, and some riding experience >always seem to work.
While I agree with all of the above comments, it should be pointed out that all of us stay upright on our cycles only because of gyroscopic forces induce by our spinning wheels. In this regard, the more the mass of the wheel is distributed from the axle, the greater the force. If a motorcycle becomes airborne (Evel Knevle - or - pothole) it maintains its attitude merely from the gyroscpic effect, and not the balancing skill of the rider.
In the above regard, naturally a motorcycle with a big wheel(s) is more resistant to being overturned than the same cycle with small wheels. OTOH, I rode a scooter 35 years ago throughout S.F. bay area, crossed the Bay Bridge (legal at the time if last ramp on and first ramp off) daily to CAl Berkeley, and had no problems. I will say tha in heavy winds such as emerging from alongside a semi in windy conditions, the scooter was highly unstable. Under similar conditions my motorcycle slightly wobbles.
Then again, most of my riding was at 25 m.p.h. or so.
On 15 Jun 1999 17:24:29 -0700, j...@best.com (Jason O'Rourke) wrote:
>despite claims to the contrary, I don't see how you can get around the >problems of the donut sized wheels, and the matching brakes. With the >terrible state of roads these days, I'll take all the rubber I can get. >And I love my 17/18 wheels.
You gotta try a *modern* scooter. The Italjet I rode with the centerhub steering handled bumps and potholes with aplomb. No worries.
It also has brakes that will stop you on a dime. That's DUAL discs mind you!!
Now some cheezy Razz 50 or some such? Well, I dunno about those.
Remember that while scooters are not very common over here, they are rampant in Europe. And believe me, city roads over there are only marginally better than here from what I've seen.
-- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - "It's such a fine line between stupid and...And clever." Erik Astrup 1995 Triumph Tiger Team Iguana Racing (Ret!) http://www.mother.com/~eastrup/ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -
Hmmm...from the responses I've read, it seems I was wrong about scooters! I just remember seeing two people on a (small) scooter zig- zagging up California street trying to get up the hill. They made it, but it didn't seem very safe looking.
I guess the trick is to get at least a 150 or 250 scooter.
Me, I'll stick with my bike, I guess I just wanted my girlfriend to ride a bike so we can ride together, though in the city, I don't think either bike or scooter is more convenient or inconvenient than the other, except that you don't have to fuel the scooter as often.
It seems to be though that scooter riders are a little more relaxed about safety gear (I guess it's OK if you don't ride the highways). Most people I see wear the 3/4 face helmets, no gloves, high heels/dress shoes and skirts/suits.
I'll look into them more before dismissing them.
Any negative opinions??
Vincerama
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.