Google Mail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Is the LAMP stack dead for web-scale computing?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Follow-up To:
Add Cc | Add Follow-up to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers that you hear
 
Tony Lucas  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 24 Feb 2008, 13:04
From: Tony Lucas <t...@xcalibre.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 05:04:00 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Is the LAMP stack dead for web-scale computing?
On 21 Feb, 12:08, Ross Cooney <ross.coo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,

> The LAMP (Linux, Apache, Mysql, PHP) stack great for small websites
> and web apps...but what happens when you need scalability? There is no
> easy and cheap way to scale.

> The only way to scale with the LAMP stack is to add more
> servers...but...once you split each component onto a separate server
> what next? If you need to scale mysql you need a cluster, if you need
> to scale apache then you need a load balancer and several servers. It
> all becomes expensive, time consuming and littered with problems. I
> have run many sites like this...one such site had over 20 servers! I
> just don't think that is is sustainable.

> Over the past year I have been working with cloud computing quite a
> bit. It is not easy to move a web application to a cloud computing
> platform. There are heaps of technical challenges, but, each challenge
> is worth overcoming because of the huge advantages.

> Let me give you an example...if you want to bring publicity to your
> site or service you must aspire to get it listed in slashdot, or
> techcrunch or something like that. Well...how do you think you could
> scale for the traffic? Simple...create a scalable architecture, host
> it on Amazon EC2, and then simply "turn the knob" (so to speak) when
> traffic surges. They pay for actual usage while those servers are
> active, and then simply turn that knob back down when the surge
> subsides. No huge investment, no servers to install in your data
> center...no fuss!

> Web-scale is all about huge growth. If your business is in this area
> then cloud computing is your friend.

> Ross

The LAMP stack itself isnt dead, although you do make some valuable
points regarding scaling databases etc, scaling web by itself is
becoming fairly trivial these days with the right infrastructure
underneath (and this is where I think your point is really aimed at).
Traditional dedicated hosting is not dead yet, but will be in the
future, with cloud/utility computing leading the way, enabling you to
respond to rapid changes in demand without any concern, which is an
impossibility with dedicated hosting at the moment.

I also believe that migrating existing applications to cloud platforms
is going to get easier and easier, but then I do have a vested
interest there :)

Look forward to speaking to you all at the next meeting.

Tony.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google