<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>alt.tv.tech.hdtv Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv</link>
  <description></description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Market for new HDTV</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/67cdbd5e45219eb3/75ee9f8b8cdfba19?show_docid=75ee9f8b8cdfba19</link>
  <description>
  For the record, I am an engineer and a member of the IEEE Broadcast &lt;br&gt; Technology Group and worked with television sine 1966, and here is &lt;br&gt; what I own.... &lt;br&gt; Samsung LN40B540 40-Inch 60 Hz 1080p LCD HDTV $800 &lt;br&gt; Directv HR21 HDTV receiver with DVR &lt;br&gt; Winegard HD-1080 2-Bay Bowtie UHF and High Band VHF Antenna
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/67cdbd5e45219eb3/75ee9f8b8cdfba19?show_docid=75ee9f8b8cdfba19</guid>
  <author>
  fr...@frankcoins.com
  (Frank Provasek)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 17:35:54 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 16:9 aspect ratio and StarTrek movie in Blu Ray</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/97a8f68bbb4e07eb/edc18ea4caeb5d3a?show_docid=edc18ea4caeb5d3a</link>
  <description>
  Leaving aside preferences for a moment, I am still thinking that a &lt;br&gt; properly formatted movie, originally shot in, say 2.3:1 and being shown &lt;br&gt; on 16:9 with black bars will be as high a resolution as possible. In &lt;br&gt; other words, the material is being shown on a reduced sized screen (due &lt;br&gt; to the bars) and this alone will increase the apparent resolution unless
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/97a8f68bbb4e07eb/edc18ea4caeb5d3a?show_docid=edc18ea4caeb5d3a</guid>
  <author>
  jp...@comcast.net
  (John McWilliams)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 17:13:51 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 16:9 aspect ratio and StarTrek movie in Blu Ray</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/97a8f68bbb4e07eb/f2bbec3042764238?show_docid=f2bbec3042764238</link>
  <description>
  I know, that is what one get if some smartasses select a new world wide &lt;br&gt; NON existing screen format. ( 16X9 ) &lt;br&gt; You mean you want a miniaturized or in case of a wide anamorphic movie &lt;br&gt; a hardly visible version of the original, OK. &lt;br&gt; When a new movie is edited the way I suggest, you never know is &lt;br&gt; was edited in the first place, exept you would enjoy the full resolution
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/97a8f68bbb4e07eb/f2bbec3042764238?show_docid=f2bbec3042764238</guid>
  <author>
  nom...@hotmail.com
  (Edmund)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 16:59:04 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 16:9 aspect ratio and StarTrek movie in Blu Ray</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/97a8f68bbb4e07eb/d641360276f3bb91?show_docid=d641360276f3bb91</link>
  <description>
  You keep using the term EDITED. We don&#39;t want movies edited (altered) for &lt;br&gt; television. We want the original vision of the film maker, not an edited &lt;br&gt; (altered, hacked up, squeezed, adulterated, dumbed down, compromised, etc) &lt;br&gt; version of the film. The loss of a bit of resolution in this instance is &lt;br&gt; preferable over loss of the actual picture composition. If you want to
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/97a8f68bbb4e07eb/d641360276f3bb91?show_docid=d641360276f3bb91</guid>
  <author>
  toma...@tomaras.com
  (Charles Tomaras)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 15:28:25 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Most error-ridden article EVER on TV standards</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/131b7a1e1966b2df/a391a3026171c235?show_docid=a391a3026171c235</link>
  <description>
  eh? &amp;quot;parts of the world&amp;quot; are what they call &amp;quot;regions.&amp;quot; So the sets you &lt;br&gt; buy are already tuned to your region. Most sets have a EROM that &lt;br&gt; remembers the region setting, and a set can usually be &lt;br&gt; cleared/rebooted... so you can set the region again.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/131b7a1e1966b2df/a391a3026171c235?show_docid=a391a3026171c235</guid>
  <author>
  r...@spamless.com
  (RickMerrill)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 15:18:07 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Stand alone ATSC OTA DVR?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/c2ef0688e83fc3bf/f9ec9dfe65fed381?show_docid=f9ec9dfe65fed381</link>
  <description>
  I plan on using MythTV, but I want to make sure what I get is supported. &lt;br&gt; The board I want has an Nvidia processor built in and was designed to be &lt;br&gt; used for HDTV.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/c2ef0688e83fc3bf/f9ec9dfe65fed381?show_docid=f9ec9dfe65fed381</guid>
  <author>
  ra...@dakine.com.invalid
  (Rastamon)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 09:23:03 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 16:9 aspect ratio and StarTrek movie in Blu Ray</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/97a8f68bbb4e07eb/8f301632381b9f8e?show_docid=8f301632381b9f8e</link>
  <description>
  And so do I. &lt;br&gt; Jep but we talking HD content here and ALL cinema movies are available &lt;br&gt; in HD ( I guess ) So if these movies where edited the way I suggested I am &lt;br&gt; pretty sure you will appreciate that too. Max resolution, max screen size &lt;br&gt; and max movie experience, I could not care less if some 4 X3 content is
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/97a8f68bbb4e07eb/8f301632381b9f8e?show_docid=8f301632381b9f8e</guid>
  <author>
  nom...@hotmail.com
  (Edmund)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 09:08:15 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Help me buy wall mount for LCD HDTV?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/cd654f499a600634/e16b631dbb4b64e9?show_docid=e16b631dbb4b64e9</link>
  <description>
  Lie on the bed and have someone hold a mirror that is parallel to the &lt;br&gt; spot you would mount the mirror. Tilt the mirror, but keep it &lt;br&gt; parallel to the wall. Can you see yourself? Do you have to rotate the &lt;br&gt; mirror to see your self. Same for the TV &lt;br&gt; Ask Vizio. Ask the store where you bought it.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/cd654f499a600634/e16b631dbb4b64e9?show_docid=e16b631dbb4b64e9</guid>
  <author>
  star...@verizon.net
  (starrin)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 08:44:57 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Help me buy wall mount for LCD HDTV?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/cd654f499a600634/67f8f9ac472cae65?show_docid=67f8f9ac472cae65</link>
  <description>
  Your link shows the whole page. I bought this one: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.monoprice.com/products/product.asp?c_id=108&amp;cp_id=10828&amp;cs_id=1082802&amp;p_id=3411&amp;seq=1&amp;format=2&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; I think you mean this one: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.monoprice.com/products/product.asp?c_id=108&amp;cp_id=10828&amp;cs_id=1082802&amp;p_id=4566&amp;seq=1&amp;format=2&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Mines tilts down about 20 deg max. I have a 26&amp;quot; Vizio LCD TV, mounted on
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/cd654f499a600634/67f8f9ac472cae65?show_docid=67f8f9ac472cae65</guid>
  <author>
  ra...@dakine.com.invalid
  (Rastamon)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 08:32:55 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Stand alone ATSC OTA DVR?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/c2ef0688e83fc3bf/fccaee098b865f7f?show_docid=fccaee098b865f7f</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;m not sure the Intel Atom single core has the power to display HD &lt;br&gt; unless the video has either some kind of video decode assist. I used XvMC &lt;br&gt; with the old Duron overclocked to 2000MHz. Without the assist, it took &lt;br&gt; 80-100% cpu power, and only about 50% with it. If you have VDPAU capable &lt;br&gt; video, the required cpu power is really low and about any cpu would work.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/c2ef0688e83fc3bf/fccaee098b865f7f?show_docid=fccaee098b865f7f</guid>
  <author>
  w.new...@invalid.invalid
  (Wes Newell)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 08:25:00 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Stand alone ATSC OTA DVR?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/c2ef0688e83fc3bf/dca8328af48c9f9c?show_docid=dca8328af48c9f9c</link>
  <description>
  m...@privacy.net wrote (in part): &lt;br&gt; There is no &amp;quot;best,&amp;quot; only best for a given situation at a given time. &lt;br&gt; Ethernet is a versatile approach because it isn&#39;t tied to any computer &lt;br&gt; or operating system. SiliconDust&#39;s forum is very active and questions &lt;br&gt; are quickly responded to by company reps. Software and firmware
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/c2ef0688e83fc3bf/dca8328af48c9f9c?show_docid=dca8328af48c9f9c</guid>
  <author>
  mibb...@large
  (Del Mibbler)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 06:57:58 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Most error-ridden article EVER on TV standards</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/131b7a1e1966b2df/41d2238c3d9ec5c2?show_docid=41d2238c3d9ec5c2</link>
  <description>
  Only on a PC drive. Normal DVD players in my part of the world are &lt;br&gt; region free.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/131b7a1e1966b2df/41d2238c3d9ec5c2?show_docid=41d2238c3d9ec5c2</guid>
  <author>
  mutley90210rem...@hotmail.removecom
  (Mutley)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 06:19:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: more HD bullshit</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/ff200926eab8ab16/18d1216f7dbc2c0a?show_docid=18d1216f7dbc2c0a</link>
  <description>
  Oh yeah....my bad! Maybe if Lucky Strike had the legs of Old Gold it &lt;br&gt; would be easier to remember!
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/ff200926eab8ab16/18d1216f7dbc2c0a?show_docid=18d1216f7dbc2c0a</guid>
  <author>
  gorta...@gmail.com
  (Stewart)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 03:12:21 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Help me buy wall mount for LCD HDTV?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/cd654f499a600634/7fdcd4b871b2e1a7?show_docid=7fdcd4b871b2e1a7</link>
  <description>
  I bought a small 26&amp;quot; Vizio LCD for the bedroom. &lt;br&gt; I went to monoprice.com to look at wall mounts but &lt;br&gt; there is a dizzying array of them &lt;br&gt; I &amp;quot;think&amp;quot; all I need for bedroom use is a mount the &lt;br&gt; tilts up/down. There appears to be three &lt;br&gt; choices.....silver, black, and one that has no &amp;quot;no &lt;br&gt; logo&amp;quot; whatever the heck that means. see link
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/cd654f499a600634/7fdcd4b871b2e1a7?show_docid=7fdcd4b871b2e1a7</guid>
  <author>
  m...@privacy.net
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 02:36:28 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Stand alone ATSC OTA DVR?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/c2ef0688e83fc3bf/5f12935cbc1557bf?show_docid=5f12935cbc1557bf</link>
  <description>
  Do you feel the HDHomeRun is the best way to go for &lt;br&gt; tuners?? &lt;br&gt; It is better especially when the video source such as &lt;br&gt; antenna or cable outlet not close to any computer, yes? &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m torn between tuners IN the PC or this HDHomeRun &lt;br&gt; thing. What say you?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.tv.tech.hdtv/browse_frm/thread/c2ef0688e83fc3bf/5f12935cbc1557bf?show_docid=5f12935cbc1557bf</guid>
  <author>
  m...@privacy.net
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2009 01:54:22 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
