<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>alt.support.diabetes Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes</link>
  <description>Support for dealing with diabetes and related topics</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Eat well, be happy, enjoy thanksgiving!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/08999f5722b4b6d7/e63ca72dd4e0ee31?show_docid=e63ca72dd4e0ee31</link>
  <description>
  At the rate that people-vermin like verity overeat, don&#39;t expect too &lt;br&gt; many to be around later.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/08999f5722b4b6d7/e63ca72dd4e0ee31?show_docid=e63ca72dd4e0ee31</guid>
  <author>
  efacsimi...@gmail.com
  (MU)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2009 02:38:44 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Several alternatives for aspirin therapy</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/d04b276e046f649b/6d61f43af459fd01?show_docid=6d61f43af459fd01</link>
  <description>
  (in article &amp;lt;heottp$bm...@news.eternal-sep tember.org&amp;gt;): &lt;br&gt; Your comments obviously go along with your intellect and once again show when &lt;br&gt; you do not have the facts, you resort to personal attacks and insults. Thank &lt;br&gt; you MU/Chung for proving that once again.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/d04b276e046f649b/6d61f43af459fd01?show_docid=6d61f43af459fd01</guid>
  <author>
  mosn...@gmail.com
  (MoSn)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2009 01:52:24 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Several alternatives for aspirin therapy</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/d04b276e046f649b/26fc9b45c0c7713f?show_docid=26fc9b45c0c7713f</link>
  <description>
  (in article &amp;lt;4b0fe634$0$11061$1c468...@new s.club.cc.cmu.edu&amp;gt;): &lt;br&gt; You are corrected. Not only is it not in a peer reviewed article but not &lt;br&gt; even in a letter to the editor in the journal, but an on-line forum in which &lt;br&gt; anyone can post a comment. &lt;br&gt; This just goes to show that no where is this 2 pound diet is in a peer
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/d04b276e046f649b/26fc9b45c0c7713f?show_docid=26fc9b45c0c7713f</guid>
  <author>
  mosn...@gmail.com
  (MoSn)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2009 01:50:10 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: New definitiion of metabolic syndrome by worldwide scientific consensus, as usual, the ADA is out of step with the scientists</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/b9664420d93570ed/16a12084e5d95882?show_docid=16a12084e5d95882</link>
  <description>
  In article &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;wldbilly-42879A.21153721112.. .@c-61-68-245-199.per.connect. net.au&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; Does anyone see mention of T1 diabetes here? I didn&#39;t think so.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/b9664420d93570ed/16a12084e5d95882?show_docid=16a12084e5d95882</guid>
  <author>
  wildbi...@withouta.net
  (Wildbilly)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2009 01:15:31 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: More Worthless Chung DUNG</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/c7b4c7a5e375a0ae/aa978283aee800f5?show_docid=aa978283aee800f5</link>
  <description>
  Andy Chung &lt;br&gt; Board-certified Spamming Mental Defective
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/c7b4c7a5e375a0ae/aa978283aee800f5?show_docid=aa978283aee800f5</guid>
  <author>
  flakey...@aol.com
  (Ken)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2009 01:12:39 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: New definitiion of metabolic syndrome by worldwide scientific consensus, as usual, the ADA is out of step with the scientists</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/b9664420d93570ed/5aa6b305f5ca0d81?show_docid=5aa6b305f5ca0d81</link>
  <description>
  In article &amp;lt;b3nlg5pck507dbi8ed0ebmlru2bjv qb...@4ax.com&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; Aw, another literate challenged poster. Don&#39;t be too hard on yourself. &lt;br&gt; Anybody can see by the smile who you are talking about.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/b9664420d93570ed/5aa6b305f5ca0d81?show_docid=5aa6b305f5ca0d81</guid>
  <author>
  wildbi...@withouta.net
  (Wildbilly)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2009 01:12:16 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Eat well, be happy, enjoy thanksgiving!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/08999f5722b4b6d7/eea6fd52a7089ed3?show_docid=eea6fd52a7089ed3</link>
  <description>
  Meaning the scum measurements are out the window, good. &lt;br&gt; Notice no volume was given. It doesn&#39;t matter. &lt;br&gt; Obviously Donkeys have not yet given birth to a man child. &lt;br&gt; Still stuck at the same point on the tape, eh? &lt;br&gt; The only reason I will not address you directly is that I am unwilling &lt;br&gt; to drop by and pay you a visit, I also shook the dust off my feet
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/08999f5722b4b6d7/eea6fd52a7089ed3?show_docid=eea6fd52a7089ed3</guid>
  <author>
  origin...@frag.com
  (Peter B)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2009 01:11:51 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: breakfast</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/2a3363555b221ae8/33074ca1994be902?show_docid=33074ca1994be902</link>
  <description>
  ae3a-3aaaa9297...@u18g2000pro. googlegroups.com... &lt;br&gt; Original Fiber One is quite low. Kellog&#39;s Special K High Protein is not &lt;br&gt; too bad.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/2a3363555b221ae8/33074ca1994be902?show_docid=33074ca1994be902</guid>
  <author>
  r...@zianet.com
  (ray)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2009 01:11:21 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: breakfast</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/2a3363555b221ae8/faadf923531534a5?show_docid=faadf923531534a5</link>
  <description>
  Lowest carb breakfast cereals I&#39;ve found are original Fibre One and &lt;br&gt; Kellog&#39;s Special K High Protein. My usual breakfast is two eggs, two &lt;br&gt; slices bacon and 1/2 double fiber english muffin.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/2a3363555b221ae8/faadf923531534a5?show_docid=faadf923531534a5</guid>
  <author>
  r...@zianet.com
  (ray)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2009 01:09:54 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: New definitiion of metabolic syndrome by worldwide scientific consensus, as usual, the ADA is out of step with the scientists</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/b9664420d93570ed/538bff66d3123a9c?show_docid=538bff66d3123a9c</link>
  <description>
  In article &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;95faf79a-b1f2-49ae-b628-e08c5 d31f...@r31g2000vbi.googlegrou ps.com&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; And a fool you appear to remain, or maybe you don&#39;t read good. The &lt;br&gt; subject was &amp;quot;Metabolic Syndrome&amp;quot;, so you can just take your needle and &lt;br&gt; stick it.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/b9664420d93570ed/538bff66d3123a9c?show_docid=538bff66d3123a9c</guid>
  <author>
  wildbi...@withouta.net
  (Wildbilly)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2009 01:08:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Eat well, be happy, enjoy thanksgiving!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/08999f5722b4b6d7/595991bae59809e2?show_docid=595991bae59809e2</link>
  <description>
  It would appear so. :) &lt;br&gt; I also saw no distinction made regarding food poisoning where 2 oz might &lt;br&gt; kill.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/08999f5722b4b6d7/595991bae59809e2?show_docid=595991bae59809e2</guid>
  <author>
  origin...@frag.com
  (Peter B)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2009 01:04:15 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Eat well, be happy, enjoy thanksgiving!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/08999f5722b4b6d7/81605657e5010997?show_docid=81605657e5010997</link>
  <description>
  So what happens if the vermin leave later?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/08999f5722b4b6d7/81605657e5010997?show_docid=81605657e5010997</guid>
  <author>
  origin...@frag.com
  (Peter B)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2009 01:00:31 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: breakfast</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/2a3363555b221ae8/2e2024afed779956?show_docid=2e2024afed779956</link>
  <description>
  &amp;quot;The conclusion is not supported even by the data the authors cite. &lt;br&gt; That&#39;s what&#39;s wrong with limiting your understanding to the headlines &lt;br&gt; and conclusions.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; How so, considering no &amp;quot;data&amp;quot; was given. This is a review of research &lt;br&gt; paper. I have been following this topic for years and have seen it &lt;br&gt; develope in the direction the paper suggests.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/2a3363555b221ae8/2e2024afed779956?show_docid=2e2024afed779956</guid>
  <author>
  li...@monomaniacal.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2009 23:07:16 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: What went wrong with Chung&#39;s life</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/d04b276e046f649b/7ff21d37acfe68da?show_docid=7ff21d37acfe68da</link>
  <description>
  Geez Ken, looking at the number of posts you make regarding Chung it &lt;br&gt; does seem YOU are getting rather obsessive. &lt;br&gt; Remember ...in glass houses etc... and pot calling.... &lt;br&gt; Cheers &lt;br&gt; David &lt;br&gt; In article &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;d0b98959-8a97-4ebf-bd7f-32a81 7e2c...@f18g2000prf.googlegrou ps.com&amp;gt;,
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/d04b276e046f649b/7ff21d37acfe68da?show_docid=7ff21d37acfe68da</guid>
  <author>
  posti...@remove-to-replyconfidential-counselling.com
  (David)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2009 22:49:04 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: breakfast</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/2a3363555b221ae8/129c9894ecfaf3e8?show_docid=129c9894ecfaf3e8</link>
  <description>
  x-no-archive: yes &lt;br&gt; But it turns out that&#39;s very likely untrue. &lt;br&gt; ***&amp;gt; However, cell-culture experiments have revealed a dichotomy in the &lt;br&gt; *****There are also some novel findings &lt;br&gt; Since low carbing/high fat substantially raises HDL, this favors the &lt;br&gt; Downstate medical findings that saturated dietary fat is less likely to
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/browse_thread/thread/2a3363555b221ae8/129c9894ecfaf3e8?show_docid=129c9894ecfaf3e8</guid>
  <author>
  su...@nothanks.org
  (Susan)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2009 22:07:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
