<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>alt.sci.physics.acoustics Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics</link>
  <description>The soundness of the science of sound.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Tuning-fork and a card</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/6e5dad15346f7441/ac30bae3299c1b85?show_docid=ac30bae3299c1b85</link>
  <description>
  I have come across on the descriptions of the experiments with the &lt;br&gt; tunig-forks and a cards: &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.wbabin.net/science/dinu7.pdf&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; (pages 7 - &lt;br&gt; 11) &lt;br&gt; They attracted in XIX century. Is the same today? &lt;br&gt; What about the water waves? Do they attract large obiects? &lt;br&gt; S*
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/6e5dad15346f7441/ac30bae3299c1b85?show_docid=ac30bae3299c1b85</guid>
  <author>
  sz.bia...@wp.pl
  (Szczepan Bia³ek)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2009 18:03:55 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Helmholtz absorber size question</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/9d542cb71c1b045d?show_docid=9d542cb71c1b045d</link>
  <description>
  Ethan Winer &amp;lt;blow_...@hotmail.com&amp;gt; wrote in &lt;br&gt; Sounds like gibberish to me. Perhaps something got lost in the &lt;br&gt; translation. &lt;br&gt; That is correct, but that lumped-element electrical equivalent network &lt;br&gt; model only accounts for the approximate resonant frequency of the Helmholtz &lt;br&gt; absorber. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the effective absorption
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/9d542cb71c1b045d?show_docid=9d542cb71c1b045d</guid>
  <author>
  answer...@home
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 21:18:26 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Helmholtz absorber size question</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/5f773152fffa0986?show_docid=5f773152fffa0986</link>
  <description>
  Groan. :-&amp;gt;) &lt;br&gt; In the mean time, Angelo Campanella was nice enough to email me off &lt;br&gt; list with further information. As I understand his comments, the waves &lt;br&gt; travel into the slots, so the depth of the cavity behind increases the &lt;br&gt; apparent &amp;quot;surface area&amp;quot; exposed to the room. Angelo also described an &lt;br&gt; electrical equivalent - the slot opening is a series inductor and the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/5f773152fffa0986?show_docid=5f773152fffa0986</guid>
  <author>
  blow_...@hotmail.com
  (Ethan Winer)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 18:22:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Helmholtz absorber size question</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/7b315341db91a58a?show_docid=7b315341db91a58a</link>
  <description>
  Ethan Winer &amp;lt;blow_...@hotmail.com&amp;gt; wrote in news:200e9718-1cb3-40cb-8287- &lt;br&gt; ea301d130...@g23g2000vbr.googl egroups.com: &lt;br&gt; It&#39;s not the size, it&#39;s the frequency that matters...that&#39;s what she said!
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/7b315341db91a58a?show_docid=7b315341db91a58a</guid>
  <author>
  pet...@fdiacoustics.comdu
  (Peter Davis)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 16:38:33 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: MODELLING NOISE FROM BLASTING</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/d3c7236f5de26986/a6b7d700b6aa1071?show_docid=a6b7d700b6aa1071</link>
  <description>
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; I add one rather new paper: &lt;br&gt; C. Kuzu *, A. Fisne, S.G. Ercelebi, Operational and geological &lt;br&gt; parameters in the assessing blast &lt;br&gt; induced airblast-overpressure in quarries, Applied Acoustics 70 (2009) &lt;br&gt; 404-411. &lt;br&gt; The list of references is worth browsing, too. &lt;br&gt; Kari Pesonen
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/d3c7236f5de26986/a6b7d700b6aa1071?show_docid=a6b7d700b6aa1071</guid>
  <author>
  kari.peso...@rem.welho.com
  (Kari Pesonen)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2009 11:52:57 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: MODELLING NOISE FROM BLASTING</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/d3c7236f5de26986/e42b984d89641332?show_docid=e42b984d89641332</link>
  <description>
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; There are, for example, some military blasting noise prediction methods &lt;br&gt; (simple formulas to estimate peak or max levels as a function of &lt;br&gt; explosive &lt;br&gt; mass and distance). Methods expect open of buried explosive &lt;br&gt; blasting at soil surface. &lt;br&gt; One method used in estimating quarry noises is to measure first sound
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/d3c7236f5de26986/e42b984d89641332?show_docid=e42b984d89641332</guid>
  <author>
  kari.peso...@rem.welho.com
  (Kari Pesonen)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2009 18:11:22 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>MODELLING NOISE FROM BLASTING</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/d3c7236f5de26986/061db3143340ee01?show_docid=061db3143340ee01</link>
  <description>
  Hi All &lt;br&gt; I have recently been asked to model noise from blasting activities in &lt;br&gt; a quarry which has been mothballed. As far as I am aware, there is no &lt;br&gt; previously measured blasting noise data. It is my understanding that &lt;br&gt; this is impossible. Does anyone know differently? &lt;br&gt; It is my understanding that to do any sort of modelling of blast noise
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/d3c7236f5de26986/061db3143340ee01?show_docid=061db3143340ee01</guid>
  <author>
  carlinsc...@hotmail.com
  (Scotty)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2009 14:50:22 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Helmholtz absorber size question</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/f73d12831bb1cdc4?show_docid=f73d12831bb1cdc4</link>
  <description>
  Nothing, I&#39;m afraid. He vanished. &lt;br&gt; d
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/f73d12831bb1cdc4?show_docid=f73d12831bb1cdc4</guid>
  <author>
  s...@spam.com
  (Don Pearce)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2009 21:00:35 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Helmholtz absorber size question</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/38fed58b9ef4c990?show_docid=38fed58b9ef4c990</link>
  <description>
  s...@spam.com (Don Pearce) wrote in &lt;br&gt; You had several exchanges with Bob Cain in rec.audio.pro. He seems that &lt;br&gt; he&#39;s dropped off the face of the earth. What if anything do you know?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/38fed58b9ef4c990?show_docid=38fed58b9ef4c990</guid>
  <author>
  answer...@home
  (Answerman)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2009 20:45:54 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Auditory masking.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/f8d93fc98a2e2374/b513ce9a46964e72?show_docid=b513ce9a46964e72</link>
  <description>
  On Nov 17, 7:28 pm, Linda Strautzele &amp;lt;linda.strautz...@gmail.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; Auditory masking is modeled in IEC60268-16 for the calculation of &lt;br&gt; speech intelligibility (STI). &lt;br&gt; The amount of auditory masking is captured in tabular form for some &lt;br&gt; relevant octave band levels. &lt;br&gt; The standard refers to: &amp;quot;Zwicker, E. and Feltkeller, Das Ohr als
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/f8d93fc98a2e2374/b513ce9a46964e72?show_docid=b513ce9a46964e72</guid>
  <author>
  hverteg...@gmail.com
  (Han)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2009 20:43:25 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Auditory masking.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/f8d93fc98a2e2374/39042cb3fe0849fe?show_docid=39042cb3fe0849fe</link>
  <description>
  Linda Strautzele &amp;lt;linda.strautz...@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote in news:dce55d36-0a05- &lt;br&gt; 40f1-9be6-a13ea9a92...@x31g200 0yqx.googlegroups.com: &lt;br&gt; Auditory masking is stimului specific. There aren&#39;t any formulas.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/f8d93fc98a2e2374/39042cb3fe0849fe?show_docid=39042cb3fe0849fe</guid>
  <author>
  answer...@home
  (Answerman)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2009 19:09:28 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Auditory masking.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/f8d93fc98a2e2374/0a190d9d3e32f86c?show_docid=0a190d9d3e32f86c</link>
  <description>
  Im making a scientific work in physics about frequencies relations. &lt;br&gt; Now i`m studiying about simultaneous and temporal masking, but i can`t &lt;br&gt; find formulas how to calculte new thresholds. Could anybody help me? &lt;br&gt; Thanks!
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/f8d93fc98a2e2374/0a190d9d3e32f86c?show_docid=0a190d9d3e32f86c</guid>
  <author>
  linda.strautz...@gmail.com
  (Linda Strautzele)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2009 18:28:15 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>music talent competition</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/1c31f3176dc7fff9/c7e6a0787ed5c494?show_docid=c7e6a0787ed5c494</link>
  <description>
  Music Contest 2010 – Imahollywoodstar - is a Great Hollywood Stars &lt;br&gt; Original Music Talent Song Competition live Song Contest is to open &lt;br&gt; for songwriters, lyricists and music composers. &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.imahollywoodstar.com/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/1c31f3176dc7fff9/c7e6a0787ed5c494?show_docid=c7e6a0787ed5c494</guid>
  <author>
  songcontestcalifor...@gmail.com
  (Jemse)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2009 09:28:08 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Helmholtz absorber size question</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/00f8f0a2734358f6?show_docid=00f8f0a2734358f6</link>
  <description>
  &amp;quot;Ethan Winer&amp;quot; &amp;lt;blow_...@hotmail.com&amp;gt; wrote &lt;br&gt; absorb &lt;br&gt; But we have the three types of the traps: passive, reactive and active. &lt;br&gt; The passive convert the sound into the heat. The reactive and active no. &lt;br&gt; only half the job. &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;The downside is that in some places in the room, for a given note, &lt;br&gt; compression meets compression, amplifying that frequency (constructive
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/00f8f0a2734358f6?show_docid=00f8f0a2734358f6</guid>
  <author>
  sz.bia...@wp.pl
  (Szczepan Bialek)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2009 09:27:18 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Helmholtz absorber size question</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/abd51bf441a49f98?show_docid=abd51bf441a49f98</link>
  <description>
  &amp;quot;Kari Pesonen&amp;quot; &amp;lt;Kari.Peso...@rem.welho.com&amp;gt; wrote &lt;br&gt; Each resonator need the external power. The power is from the wave emmited &lt;br&gt; by the primary source. The energy is very small so it takes time to achive &lt;br&gt; the full amplitude. &lt;br&gt; S*
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/abd51bf441a49f98?show_docid=abd51bf441a49f98</guid>
  <author>
  sz.bia...@wp.pl
  (Szczepan Bia³ek)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2009 09:04:48 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
