<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics</id>
  <title type="text">alt.sci.physics.acoustics Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  The soundness of the science of sound.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="alt.sci.physics.acoustics feed"/>
  <updated>2009-11-30T21:18:26Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.co.uk" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>answer...@home</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-30T21:18:26Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/9d542cb71c1b045d?show_docid=9d542cb71c1b045d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/9d542cb71c1b045d?show_docid=9d542cb71c1b045d"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Helmholtz absorber size question</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Ethan Winer &amp;lt;blow_...@hotmail.com&amp;gt; wrote in &lt;br&gt; Sounds like gibberish to me. Perhaps something got lost in the &lt;br&gt; translation. &lt;br&gt; That is correct, but that lumped-element electrical equivalent network &lt;br&gt; model only accounts for the approximate resonant frequency of the Helmholtz &lt;br&gt; absorber. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the effective absorption
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Ethan Winer</name>
  <email>blow_...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-30T18:22:29Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/5f773152fffa0986?show_docid=5f773152fffa0986</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/5f773152fffa0986?show_docid=5f773152fffa0986"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Helmholtz absorber size question</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Groan. :-&amp;gt;) &lt;br&gt; In the mean time, Angelo Campanella was nice enough to email me off &lt;br&gt; list with further information. As I understand his comments, the waves &lt;br&gt; travel into the slots, so the depth of the cavity behind increases the &lt;br&gt; apparent &amp;quot;surface area&amp;quot; exposed to the room. Angelo also described an &lt;br&gt; electrical equivalent - the slot opening is a series inductor and the
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Peter Davis</name>
  <email>pet...@fdiacoustics.comdu</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-30T16:38:33Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/7b315341db91a58a?show_docid=7b315341db91a58a</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/7b315341db91a58a?show_docid=7b315341db91a58a"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Helmholtz absorber size question</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Ethan Winer &amp;lt;blow_...@hotmail.com&amp;gt; wrote in news:200e9718-1cb3-40cb-8287- &lt;br&gt; ea301d130...@g23g2000vbr.googl egroups.com: &lt;br&gt; It&#39;s not the size, it&#39;s the frequency that matters...that&#39;s what she said!
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Kari Pesonen</name>
  <email>kari.peso...@rem.welho.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-27T11:52:57Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/d3c7236f5de26986/a6b7d700b6aa1071?show_docid=a6b7d700b6aa1071</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/d3c7236f5de26986/a6b7d700b6aa1071?show_docid=a6b7d700b6aa1071"/>
  <title type="text">Re: MODELLING NOISE FROM BLASTING</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; I add one rather new paper: &lt;br&gt; C. Kuzu *, A. Fisne, S.G. Ercelebi, Operational and geological &lt;br&gt; parameters in the assessing blast &lt;br&gt; induced airblast-overpressure in quarries, Applied Acoustics 70 (2009) &lt;br&gt; 404-411. &lt;br&gt; The list of references is worth browsing, too. &lt;br&gt; Kari Pesonen
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Kari Pesonen</name>
  <email>kari.peso...@rem.welho.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-21T18:11:22Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/d3c7236f5de26986/e42b984d89641332?show_docid=e42b984d89641332</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/d3c7236f5de26986/e42b984d89641332?show_docid=e42b984d89641332"/>
  <title type="text">Re: MODELLING NOISE FROM BLASTING</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi, &lt;br&gt; There are, for example, some military blasting noise prediction methods &lt;br&gt; (simple formulas to estimate peak or max levels as a function of &lt;br&gt; explosive &lt;br&gt; mass and distance). Methods expect open of buried explosive &lt;br&gt; blasting at soil surface. &lt;br&gt; One method used in estimating quarry noises is to measure first sound
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Scotty</name>
  <email>carlinsc...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-20T14:50:22Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/d3c7236f5de26986/061db3143340ee01?show_docid=061db3143340ee01</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/d3c7236f5de26986/061db3143340ee01?show_docid=061db3143340ee01"/>
  <title type="text">MODELLING NOISE FROM BLASTING</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hi All &lt;br&gt; I have recently been asked to model noise from blasting activities in &lt;br&gt; a quarry which has been mothballed. As far as I am aware, there is no &lt;br&gt; previously measured blasting noise data. It is my understanding that &lt;br&gt; this is impossible. Does anyone know differently? &lt;br&gt; It is my understanding that to do any sort of modelling of blast noise
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Don Pearce</name>
  <email>s...@spam.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-17T21:00:35Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/f73d12831bb1cdc4?show_docid=f73d12831bb1cdc4</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/f73d12831bb1cdc4?show_docid=f73d12831bb1cdc4"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Helmholtz absorber size question</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Nothing, I&#39;m afraid. He vanished. &lt;br&gt; d
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Answerman</name>
  <email>answer...@home</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-17T20:45:54Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/38fed58b9ef4c990?show_docid=38fed58b9ef4c990</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/38fed58b9ef4c990?show_docid=38fed58b9ef4c990"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Helmholtz absorber size question</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  s...@spam.com (Don Pearce) wrote in &lt;br&gt; You had several exchanges with Bob Cain in rec.audio.pro. He seems that &lt;br&gt; he&#39;s dropped off the face of the earth. What if anything do you know?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Han</name>
  <email>hverteg...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-17T20:43:25Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/f8d93fc98a2e2374/b513ce9a46964e72?show_docid=b513ce9a46964e72</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/f8d93fc98a2e2374/b513ce9a46964e72?show_docid=b513ce9a46964e72"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Auditory masking.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Nov 17, 7:28 pm, Linda Strautzele &amp;lt;linda.strautz...@gmail.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; Auditory masking is modeled in IEC60268-16 for the calculation of &lt;br&gt; speech intelligibility (STI). &lt;br&gt; The amount of auditory masking is captured in tabular form for some &lt;br&gt; relevant octave band levels. &lt;br&gt; The standard refers to: &amp;quot;Zwicker, E. and Feltkeller, Das Ohr als
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Answerman</name>
  <email>answer...@home</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-17T19:09:28Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/f8d93fc98a2e2374/39042cb3fe0849fe?show_docid=39042cb3fe0849fe</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/f8d93fc98a2e2374/39042cb3fe0849fe?show_docid=39042cb3fe0849fe"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Auditory masking.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Linda Strautzele &amp;lt;linda.strautz...@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote in news:dce55d36-0a05- &lt;br&gt; 40f1-9be6-a13ea9a92...@x31g200 0yqx.googlegroups.com: &lt;br&gt; Auditory masking is stimului specific. There aren&#39;t any formulas.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Linda Strautzele</name>
  <email>linda.strautz...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-17T18:28:15Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/f8d93fc98a2e2374/0a190d9d3e32f86c?show_docid=0a190d9d3e32f86c</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/f8d93fc98a2e2374/0a190d9d3e32f86c?show_docid=0a190d9d3e32f86c"/>
  <title type="text">Auditory masking.</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Im making a scientific work in physics about frequencies relations. &lt;br&gt; Now i`m studiying about simultaneous and temporal masking, but i can`t &lt;br&gt; find formulas how to calculte new thresholds. Could anybody help me? &lt;br&gt; Thanks!
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Jemse</name>
  <email>songcontestcalifor...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-17T09:28:08Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/1c31f3176dc7fff9/c7e6a0787ed5c494?show_docid=c7e6a0787ed5c494</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/1c31f3176dc7fff9/c7e6a0787ed5c494?show_docid=c7e6a0787ed5c494"/>
  <title type="text">music talent competition</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Music Contest 2010 – Imahollywoodstar - is a Great Hollywood Stars &lt;br&gt; Original Music Talent Song Competition live Song Contest is to open &lt;br&gt; for songwriters, lyricists and music composers. &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.imahollywoodstar.com/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Szczepan Bialek</name>
  <email>sz.bia...@wp.pl</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-17T09:27:18Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/00f8f0a2734358f6?show_docid=00f8f0a2734358f6</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/00f8f0a2734358f6?show_docid=00f8f0a2734358f6"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Helmholtz absorber size question</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;quot;Ethan Winer&amp;quot; &amp;lt;blow_...@hotmail.com&amp;gt; wrote &lt;br&gt; absorb &lt;br&gt; But we have the three types of the traps: passive, reactive and active. &lt;br&gt; The passive convert the sound into the heat. The reactive and active no. &lt;br&gt; only half the job. &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;The downside is that in some places in the room, for a given note, &lt;br&gt; compression meets compression, amplifying that frequency (constructive
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Szczepan Bia³ek</name>
  <email>sz.bia...@wp.pl</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-17T09:04:48Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/abd51bf441a49f98?show_docid=abd51bf441a49f98</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/abd51bf441a49f98?show_docid=abd51bf441a49f98"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Helmholtz absorber size question</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;quot;Kari Pesonen&amp;quot; &amp;lt;Kari.Peso...@rem.welho.com&amp;gt; wrote &lt;br&gt; Each resonator need the external power. The power is from the wave emmited &lt;br&gt; by the primary source. The energy is very small so it takes time to achive &lt;br&gt; the full amplitude. &lt;br&gt; S*
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Answerman</name>
  <email>answer...@home.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2009-11-16T21:31:32Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/2e774fa393777a3a?show_docid=2e774fa393777a3a</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.sci.physics.acoustics/browse_frm/thread/5023b1a524884b09/2e774fa393777a3a?show_docid=2e774fa393777a3a"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Helmholtz absorber size question</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  s...@spam.com (Don Pearce) wrote in &lt;br&gt; Page 108, equation (4.2).
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
