Google Mail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Why the Redstone's might be Opposed to $cientology
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Follow-up To:
Add Cc | Add Follow-up to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers that you hear
 
Quaoar  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
(2 users)  More options 26 Aug 2006, 01:51
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Quaoar <qua...@marcabfleet.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:51:33 -0600
Local: Sat 26 Aug 2006 01:51
Subject: Why the Redstone's might be Opposed to $cientology
 From Wikipedia (not a source for defensible references!!)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumner_Redstone_Jr.

"The youngest of billionaire Sumner Redstone's three children, Sumner
Jr. was adopted in 1971 by the Redstones when his adopted father was a
relatively late age of 47 years old, so there is a significant
difference in age between him and his adopted siblings Brent and Shari.
He was brought up in the Jewish religion although he has been rumored to
have completed courses run by the Church of Scientology, encouraged by
his friend John Travolta."

Then, there is this Defamer link:

http://defamer.com/hollywood/paramount/redstone-vs-cruise-was-lady-re...

"Redstone Vs. Cruise: Was Lady Redstone Responsible?

It's a cliche to say that some of history's greatest battles have been
fought over, or to end the incessant nagging of, a great woman. And yet
according to Page Six, that is exactly what might have been the catalyst
for what led to one of the most sensational verbal slap-fights in recent
Hollywood history, between semi-fossilized Viacom chieftain Sumner
Redstone and his former marquee kook, Tom Cruise:

     According to an insider, [Redstone's wife, Paula] Fortunato, a
former school teacher, was "incensed" by Cruise's criticism of Brooke
Shields, who wrote about how prescription drugs relieved her postpartum
depression.

     Our source says Fortunato told her powerful husband, "I never want
to see another Tom Cruise movie again!"

     Viacom spokesman Carl Folta said, "It is true that Mrs. Redstone
disagrees with Tom Cruise's views, but she and Mr. Redstone see every
Paramount film." "

One wonders, just wonders?

Q


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
nexibe...@yahoo.co.in  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
(1 user)  More options 28 Aug 2006, 10:08
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: nexibe...@yahoo.co.in
Date: 28 Aug 2006 02:08:56 -0700
Local: Mon 28 Aug 2006 10:08
Subject: Re: Why the Redstone's might be Opposed to $cientology

Quaoar wrote:
> From Wikipedia (not a source for defensible references!!)

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumner_Redstone_Jr.

This website is gone. Has someone deleted the wikipedia page so quickly
or what? (Google has a cached version...)

[SNIP]


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Barbara Schwarz  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 29 Aug 2006, 02:30
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: "Barbara Schwarz" <Barbara.Schw...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:30:47 -0600
Local: Tues 29 Aug 2006 02:30
Subject: Re: Why the Redstone's might be Opposed to $cientology

<nexibe...@yahoo.co.in> wrote in message

news:1156756136.359901.244150@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...

> Quaoar wrote:
>> From Wikipedia (not a source for defensible references!!)

>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumner_Redstone_Jr.

> This website is gone. Has someone deleted the wikipedia page so quickly
> or what? (Google has a cached version...)

> [SNIP]

Wikipedia is a destructive anti-free speech cult with policies like STASI or
KGB. Gangs rule what articles stay and what articles are being removed.
Nothing is trustworthy about Wikipiggi.

Barbara Schwarz  (Looking for the original Mark [Marty] Rathbun. No
impostor, please!)

http://www.thunderstar.net/~schwarz/lrh/fbidocs.html
--
(I am concerned about Dave Touretzky's activities. He also has bomb
instructions on the net.) http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/

Brian J. Bruns aka Burns plays a "cop" on the net but he is a felon
(computer crimes), a spammer, an anti-free speech activist, and the abusive
AHBL website is his. He lies about me on his website and is disturbed.
Inmate # 445064, FBI: 843935WB8
Bruns is the abuser, and he is supported by Korey Jerome Kruse ("Lord Xenu",
"Simkatu" or "Vivaldi") who also just came out of jail and is, according to
the courts, an habitual offender. He also was ordered to undergo psych
evaluation. Of course it didn't help.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.scientology/msg/70fdd710b...

http://groups.google.com/groups/search?hl=en&q=%22Korey+Jerome+Kruse%22


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2010 Google