If anyone listened to my interview on CBC radio last week, you may recall I said the church would not be foolish enough to mess with Paul Haggis. Well, my friends in and around the OSA Network and within the journalism community have informed me of facts that have disabused me of the notion that the church retains any smarts. Apparently, I sorely underestimated DM’s level of desperation and madness.
OSA has instituted a Cold War era operation wherein Paul’s counseling files have been culled for “transgressions” the church thinks might make news. Tid bits have been leaked to “independent journalists” (who in fact are not independent and are not really journalists). It is being done in a J Edgar Hooveresque manner, making it look like “reporters” have on their own initiative found some cracks in Paul’s armor and “old friends” have had some come-to-Jesus moments where they feel compelled to talk about Paul.
> If anyone listened to my interview on CBC radio last week, you may > recall I said the church would not be foolish enough to mess with Paul > Haggis. Well, my friends in and around the OSA Network and within the > journalism community have informed me of facts that have disabused me > of the notion that the church retains any smarts. Apparently, I > sorely underestimated DM’s level of desperation and madness.
> OSA has instituted a Cold War era operation wherein Paul’s counseling > files have been culled for “transgressions” the church thinks might > make news. Tid bits have been leaked to “independent journalists” (who > in fact are not independent and are not really journalists). It is > being done in a J Edgar Hooveresque manner, making it look like > “reporters” have on their own initiative found some cracks in Paul’s > armor and “old friends” have had some come-to-Jesus moments where they > feel compelled to talk about Paul.
Dang it, again I couldn't resist posting what I consider an important correction, unlikely it will be approved if I look at previous actions. Oh well.
> If anyone listened to my interview on CBC radio last week, you may > recall I said the church would not be foolish enough to mess with Paul > Haggis. Well, my friends in and around the OSA Network and within the > journalism community have informed me of facts that have disabused me > of the notion that the church retains any smarts. Apparently, I > sorely underestimated DM’s level of desperation and madness.
> OSA has instituted a Cold War era operation wherein Paul’s counseling > files have been culled for “transgressions” the church thinks might > make news. Tid bits have been leaked to “independent journalists” (who > in fact are not independent and are not really journalists). It is > being done in a J Edgar Hooveresque manner, making it look like > “reporters” have on their own initiative found some cracks in Paul’s > armor and “old friends” have had some come-to-Jesus moments where they > feel compelled to talk about Paul.
I couldn't agree more. Their very actions were what got me speaking out. Pre that, I was just going to leave, "Under the radar" (combined with what I thought was my small, insignificant, announcement of "Magoo left the building"). Truly, it was *their* abuses that got me realizing I couldn't stand by and do nothing, knowing the degree of pain many people were suffering due to this moronic "Church".
I know Paul won't care about their 'releases'.....but hopefully he will care about their sick, disgusting attempts to shut him up.
To ALL who help keep free speech alive, despite the endless attempts of this mafia-like organization to stop what they don't want known, thank you for your courage, knowledge and experiences.
Buy "Blownforgood"s book at Blownforgood.com and "My Billion Year Contract" at MyBillionyearcontract.com
Both are excellent reads.
Tory/Magoo
On Nov 4, 1:00 pm, Eldon <EldonB...@aol.com> wrote:
> If anyone listened to my interview on CBC radio last week, you may > recall I said the church would not be foolish enough to mess with Paul > Haggis. Well, my friends in and around the OSA Network and within the > journalism community have informed me of facts that have disabused me > of the notion that the church retains any smarts. Apparently, I > sorely underestimated DM’s level of desperation and madness.
> OSA has instituted a Cold War era operation wherein Paul’s counseling > files have been culled for “transgressions” the church thinks might > make news. Tid bits have been leaked to “independent journalists” (who > in fact are not independent and are not really journalists). It is > being done in a J Edgar Hooveresque manner, making it look like > “reporters” have on their own initiative found some cracks in Paul’s > armor and “old friends” have had some come-to-Jesus moments where they > feel compelled to talk about Paul.
<mago...@charter.net> wrote: > "Astrid" <Astrid7777...@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:5ae1ef44-d38e-4643-9cae-0bbae26d03d9@2g2000prl.googlegroups.com... > Hope it's true. Could open the Haggis wound wide open, and cause > controversy anew for this most clueless division of Sciloontology -- > the celebs.
> I couldn't agree more. Their very actions were what got me speaking out. > Pre that, I was just going to leave, "Under the radar" (combined with what I > thought was my small, insignificant, announcement of "Magoo left the > building"). Truly, it was *their* abuses that got me realizing I couldn't > stand by and do nothing, knowing the degree of pain many people were > suffering due to this moronic "Church".
> I know Paul won't care about their 'releases'.....but hopefully he will > care about their sick, disgusting attempts to shut him up.
Yeah, real smart move, clams. Get a Best Picture Academy Award winner even more pissed off about your leaking of stuff about people (the main thing in his letter, really). Gee, lemme guess, it'll be sexual, and nobody in Hollywood will care, and they'll be even more pissed off at you and $cientologists in general.
PLEASE go ahead. I think Paul would just love to read something I happen to have around about the cult. Oh boy, would he.
> To ALL who help keep free speech alive, despite the endless attempts > of this mafia-like organization to stop what they don't want known, > thank you for your courage, knowledge and experiences.
> Buy "Blownforgood"s book at Blownforgood.com > and > "My Billion Year Contract" at MyBillionyearcontract.com
> > If anyone listened to my interview on CBC radio last week, you may > > recall I said the church would not be foolish enough to mess with Paul > > Haggis. Well, my friends in and around the OSA Network and within the > > journalism community have informed me of facts that have disabused me > > of the notion that the church retains any smarts. Apparently, I > > sorely underestimated DM’s level of desperation and madness.
> > OSA has instituted a Cold War era operation wherein Paul’s counseling > > files have been culled for “transgressions” the church thinks might > > make news. Tid bits have been leaked to “independent journalists” (who > > in fact are not independent and are not really journalists). It is > > being done in a J Edgar Hooveresque manner, making it look like > > “reporters” have on their own initiative found some cracks in Paul’s > > armor and “old friends” have had some come-to-Jesus moments where they > > feel compelled to talk about Paul.
If anyone listened to my interview on CBC radio last week, you may recall I said the church would not be foolish enough to mess with Paul Haggis. Well, my friends in and around the OSA Network and within the journalism community have informed me of facts that have disabused me of the notion that the church retains any smarts. Apparently, I sorely underestimated DM’s level of desperation and madness.
OSA has instituted a Cold War era operation wherein Paul’s counseling files have been culled for “transgressions” the church thinks might make news. Tid bits have been leaked to “independent journalists” (who in fact are not independent and are not really journalists). It is being done in a J Edgar Hooveresque manner, making it look like “reporters” have on their own initiative found some cracks in Paul’s armor and “old friends” have had some come-to-Jesus moments where they feel compelled to talk about Paul.
<<<i fear indeed that many signs of the craziness of the guy were visible since long, but now, we have it just right before the eyes; in tehe same order of ineptitude, we got few weeks ago a special issue of the "Freedom" mag where the stupid gang attacks the SP times... They like so muuuuuch to get enemies, they exist nly to have.
But they can't understand that the more enemies, the less allies!
> In article <BJlIm.565$6c2....@newsfe03.iad>, Magoo
> <mago...@charter.net> wrote: > > "Astrid" <Astrid7777...@yahoo.com> wrote in message > >news:5ae1ef44-d38e-4643-9cae-0bbae26d03d9@2g2000prl.googlegroups.com... > > Hope it's true. Could open the Haggis wound wide open, and cause > > controversy anew for this most clueless division of Sciloontology -- > > the celebs.
> > I couldn't agree more. Their very actions were what got me speaking out. > > Pre that, I was just going to leave, "Under the radar" (combined with what I > > thought was my small, insignificant, announcement of "Magoo left the > > building"). Truly, it was *their* abuses that got me realizing I couldn't > > stand by and do nothing, knowing the degree of pain many people were > > suffering due to this moronic "Church".
> > I know Paul won't care about their 'releases'.....but hopefully he will > > care about their sick, disgusting attempts to shut him up.
> Yeah, real smart move, clams. Get a Best Picture Academy Award winner > even more pissed off about your leaking of stuff about people (the main > thing in his letter, really). Gee, lemme guess, it'll be sexual, and > nobody in Hollywood will care, and they'll be even more pissed off at > you and $cientologists in general.
It seems that you, like Marty Rathbun, predicted the cult wouldn't be so stupid as to dig up a celebrity's "overts" and disseminate them. It seems that you both underestimated the cult's rational capabilities. Not that anyone can blame either of you for that oversight. ;-)
The interesting part being that Haggis hasn't said a word about his defection himself other than confirming the authenticity of the letter. Obviously, he was prepared to shut up if they did.
> PLEASE go ahead. I think Paul would just love to read something I > happen to have around about the cult. Oh boy, would he.
> > To ALL who help keep free speech alive, despite the endless attempts > > of this mafia-like organization to stop what they don't want known, > > thank you for your courage, knowledge and experiences.
> > Buy "Blownforgood"s book at Blownforgood.com > > and > > "My Billion Year Contract" at MyBillionyearcontract.com
> > > If anyone listened to my interview on CBC radio last week, you may > > > recall I said the church would not be foolish enough to mess with Paul > > > Haggis. Well, my friends in and around the OSA Network and within the > > > journalism community have informed me of facts that have disabused me > > > of the notion that the church retains any smarts. Apparently, I > > > sorely underestimated DM’s level of desperation and madness.
> > > OSA has instituted a Cold War era operation wherein Paul’s counseling > > > files have been culled for “transgressions” the church thinks might > > > make news. Tid bits have been leaked to “independent journalists” (who > > > in fact are not independent and are not really journalists). It is > > > being done in a J Edgar Hooveresque manner, making it look like > > > “reporters” have on their own initiative found some cracks in Paul’s > > > armor and “old friends” have had some come-to-Jesus moments where they > > > feel compelled to talk about Paul.
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 02:47:04 -0800 (PST), Eldon <EldonB...@aol.com> wrote:
>It seems that you, like Marty Rathbun, predicted the cult wouldn't be >so stupid as to dig up a celebrity's "overts" and disseminate them. It >seems that you both underestimated the cult's rational capabilities. >Not that anyone can blame either of you for that oversight. ;-)
I'll believe it when I see it. On the good side, if they did something this stupid, it would out whatever cult shills in the media were dumb enough to be used as tools this way. That would be exploitable.
In article <l2p5f5p8032il99e2d22b5q14n65tu2...@4ax.com>, henri
<he...@nowhere.invalid> wrote: > On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 02:47:04 -0800 (PST), Eldon <EldonB...@aol.com> > wrote:
> >It seems that you, like Marty Rathbun, predicted the cult wouldn't be > >so stupid as to dig up a celebrity's "overts" and disseminate them. It > >seems that you both underestimated the cult's rational capabilities. > >Not that anyone can blame either of you for that oversight. ;-)
> I'll believe it when I see it. On the good side, if they did > something this stupid, it would out whatever cult shills in the media > were dumb enough to be used as tools this way. That would be > exploitable.
OSA. Ridiculous.
At this point the "great" and feared OSA is probably a bunch of chain-smoking, no sleep teenagers wondering if they'll ever get laid.
|
