Google Mail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
"How Scientology got to Bob Minton"
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  25 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Follow-up To:
Add Cc | Add Follow-up to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers that you hear
 
Jens Tingleff  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 2 Nov, 07:45
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Jens Tingleff <jenst...@tingleff.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:45:29 +0000
Local: Mon 2 Nov 2009 07:45
Subject: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Howdy!

Well, no extreme details as such, but outlines...

http://www.tampabay.com/news/scientology/how-scientology-got-to-bob-m...

Best Regards

        Jens

- --
    Key ID 0x09723C12, jenst...@tingleff.org
   Analogue filtering / 5GHz RLAN / Mandriva Linux / odds and ends
    http://www.tingleff.org/jensting/             +44 1223 829 985
     "I said 'this can't be me, must be my double'"   L Cohen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFK7o4ZimJs3AlyPBIRAgk9AJ97TOsbLV46MpUyOcJh3P6Kb3DkQwCdETpm
8fpF5b2FOsXAmDdFcNBPE5M=
=AQcy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Hartley Patterson  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 2 Nov, 12:12
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Hartley Patterson <hptt...@daisy.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:12:05 -0000
Local: Mon 2 Nov 2009 12:12
Subject: Re: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"
jenst...@tingleff.org says:

> Well, no extreme details as such, but outlines...

> http://www.tampabay.com/news/scientology/how-scientology-got-to-bob-m...

That's tired old news, and it was the traitors and apostates that were
responsible. When Mr David Miscavige found out, he ordered all the attacks
on Bob Minton to stop and quickly resolved his differences with the
Church. Mr Minton has not made any complaints about Scientology since that
day.

It almost writes itself doesn't it...

--
Patterson's Law: all public Internet discussions
about Scientology will include a post claiming that
all religions are equally bad
http://www.newsfrombree.co.uk/stolgy_0.htm


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Tigger  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 2 Nov, 14:49
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Tigger <Tiggerinthe...@webtv.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 06:49:54 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon 2 Nov 2009 14:49
Subject: Re: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"
On Nov 2, 6:12 am, Hartley Patterson <hptt...@daisy.freeserve.co.uk>
wrote:

> jenst...@tingleff.org says:

> > Well, no extreme details as such, but outlines...

> >http://www.tampabay.com/news/scientology/how-scientology-got-to-bob-m...

> That's tired old news, and it was the traitors and apostates that were
> responsible. When Mr David Miscavige found out, he ordered all the attacks
> on Bob Minton to stop and quickly resolved his differences with the
> Church. Mr Minton has not made any complaints about Scientology since that
> day.

Surely you jest.   Minton was not only ordered to stop, but to help
$CN destroy critics and make the Lisa wrongful death suit "go away".
Part of Minton's "deal" with the devil seems to have been that he,
Stacy Brooks and Mark Bunker be removed from $CN's Religious Freedon
Watch.

I wish Rinder and Rathbun would be more forthcoming with what
happened, but since it appears both they and Minton did some illegal
stuff, it is not surprising that they aren't.    But the SPTimes laid
out the facts, which "some" have been denying for years.

What did Rinder mean by this?

Quote:

"Rinder, who once described Minton's actions as "despicable and
disgusting,"
now considers him a friend."   End of Quote

> It almost writes itself doesn't it...

Gee, they left out Arnie Lerma's version of the story.

Tigger


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Maureen  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 2 Nov, 15:24
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Maureen <lermanet...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 07:24:34 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon 2 Nov 2009 15:24
Subject: Re: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"
On Nov 2, 6:12 am, Hartley Patterson <hptt...@daisy.freeserve.co.uk>
wrote:

If it's any new column that will get others in agreement with Marty
Rathbun and Mike Rinder, it is this one.
To the extreme - repeating your comment above:

"> That's tired old news, and it was the traitors and apostates "

I think Marty Rathbun used the term, "criminality." on his blog in the
last month..  Bob Minton will always be the cult's "engram" to be rid
of. The past life of the Lisa McPherson Trust fallls heavily under the
category of "Fair game" which (iirc) has not been addressed in this
article.

Nor has any subject been in real depth where Marty and Mike (R& R)
have been quoted in this ongoing series. Different from the "Chased by
the Cult" article of the other day where you could get a grasp on the
information. There were several accounts from people.

Comments will be interesting, as reporting like this stirs up ill
feelings. Of course! Maybe they want others to partake in the word
slappy show, proving that leaving out the facts draws people to throw
wild allegations.

The cult knows that this topic brings on the Machiavellian show..  Did
this article intend to stir this up, or does it turn on the auto pilot
fair game sequence? That surely takes the pressure off of Marty & Mike
who still have not talked about "follow the money."
If they want it, they have to create a new spot on the wall to focus
attention don't they?

Maureen


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Hartley Patterson  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 2 Nov, 15:52
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Hartley Patterson <hptt...@daisy.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:52:19 -0000
Local: Mon 2 Nov 2009 15:52
Subject: Re: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"
Tiggerinthe...@webtv.net says:

> > That's tired old news, and it was the traitors and apostates that were
> > responsible. When Mr David Miscavige found out, he ordered all the attacks
> > on Bob Minton to stop and quickly resolved his differences with the
> > Church. Mr Minton has not made any complaints about Scientology since that
> > day.

> Surely you jest.

I do, but would you be surprised if Tommy says something similar? In the
state he is in, Miscavige might well 'flip' and start attacking Minton
again simply because the StP Times has written a new article about him.

> I wish Rinder and Rathbun would be more forthcoming with what
> happened

Patience! It will all come out eventually, and the full gory details
aren't going to affect public opinion either way. Right now they are
playing their own game, and doing quite well IMO.

> What did Rinder mean by this?
> "Rinder, who once described Minton's actions as "despicable and
> disgusting," now considers him a friend."

That he's apologised to him? Goodness knows. IIRC it was Rathbun, not
Rinder, who arranged the settlement with Minton. They were perhaps playing
'good cop, bad cop' at the time.

--
FREEDOM is a trademark owned by
Religious Technology Center
http://www.newsfrombree.co.uk/stolgy_0.htm


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Patty Pieniadz  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 09:13
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: "Patty Pieniadz" <ppieni...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 04:13:34 -0500
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 09:13
Subject: Re: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"

The one common denominator among Minton's "friends" is that rec'd
money from him.

Makes me wonder if Rinder is part of that circle.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
henri  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 14:39
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: henri <he...@nowhere.invalid>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:39:36 -0500
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 14:39
Subject: Re: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:52:19 -0000, Hartley Patterson

<hptt...@daisy.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>That he's apologised to him? Goodness knows. IIRC it was Rathbun, not
>Rinder, who arranged the settlement with Minton. They were perhaps playing
>'good cop, bad cop' at the time.

Rinder was the point person.

http://www.sptimes.com/2002/07/07/TampaBay/How_Scientology_turne.shtml

Confessions in Clearwater

Their meeting April 6 at Pope's office was a turning point. It was so
important, Rinder -- a top Scientology official who handles the
church's legal and public affairs -- summoned his lawyer, Yingling,
from Paris, where she was on other business

The church long had suspected wrongdoing in the McPherson case. During
the meeting, Rinder told Minton, "I really want you to think seriously
about telling the truth in what has happened in this case," Minton
said.

Minton excused himself. Outside, he decided it was time to come clean.
There were lies told in the case, according to Minton. He said he
feared Scientology would uncover those lies in court and he would be
sent to jail for perjury.

He became so distressed, he gagged in the bushes.

Recalling the negotiation, Minton said: "It wasn't something I wanted
to do. I wasn't looking to start trusting the Church of Scientology
and I especially wasn't looking to trust Mike Rinder."

Back inside, he began to reveal to Rinder a series of lies he said he
had told under oath at Dandar's direction.

Yingling said she was shocked to hear Minton's account of what had
been happening in the case. The Times sought comment from Rinder for
this story, but he did not return repeated calls. Shaw, speaking for
the church, has said Scientologists are pleased the truth finally is
coming to light.

Now the church is using Minton's testimony to support an effort to get
the lawsuit dismissed. It has left Dandar fighting not only for the
McPherson case but for his own reputation. Dandar has denied all of
Minton's accusations, saying Minton's lies started after he met with
Scientology. Testimony before Schaeffer is to resume this week. "They
are committing a charade on the court," Dandar said. "They have Minton
coming in as if he were this pitiful lying witness who wanted to come
clean. He was coming in claiming to be a perjurer because he was told
to do that."


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Astrid  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 14:59
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Astrid <Astrid7777...@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:59:58 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 14:59
Subject: Re: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"
On Nov 5, 2:13 am, "Patty Pieniadz" <ppieni...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > "Rinder, who once described Minton's actions as "despicable and
> > disgusting,"
> > now considers him a friend."   End of Quote

> The one common denominator among Minton's "friends" is that rec'd
> money from him.

> Makes me wonder if Rinder is part of that circle.

Never even thought of that, but now that you mention. I have been
thinking "settlement" in there somewhere with Rinder, because while
they have used old clips of him from the cult, why is he not appearing
on TV or video, or being interviewed, other than in the print media?
I'm think that is a stipulation of a settlement, whether it is a
settlement with the cult, or with someone else I can't imagine.

My initial reaction to reading (a few years after it happened, since
I'm new to following this) that Rinder and Rathbun were no longer in
the cult, I assumed the cult would have had to have paid them off to
gag them. Because they knew too much. The stipulation would be that
neither side mentioning there ever being a settlement, however
agreeing that certain things would never be mentioned. However, now,
that doesn't necessarily seem all that likely. The cult thinks they,
with their billions, are impervious, and they know that certain
secrets Rathbun or Rinder could reveal, would incriminate themselves
too much.

Also, while on the Minton subject, I remember reading somewhere,
although this could be just a rumor -- but it does make some sense
when you consider how wacky Scientology is -- that Minton snapped when
he found that PIs were following his daughter(s). Scientology really
started to freak him out and he wanted out of the whole business.

Then again, it makes sense that they may have just found some
irregularity in the way he made his millions, that would have either
opened a can of worms, or threatened to destroy his fortune.

I think what Minton did, using a generous part of his fortune to fight
the cult, help some of the victims who were willing to speak out, and
establish the LM trust, was heroic. It is like Paulette Cooper. When
Scientology faces someone, they think has the potential to do them
very serious harm, cost them a huge amount of money, in a short amount
of time, they really focus on finding that person's ruin, and going
about it in an insidious way.

The "insidious" part is more of what I'm looking forward to hearing,
from Rinder and Rathbun.

Of all the articles in the St. Pete Times, this recent one on Minton
was poorly written and confusing. I had trouble following it, and had
to keep reading certain passages more than once. But, well, at least
it is out there.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Eldon  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 15:34
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Eldon <EldonB...@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 07:34:24 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 15:34
Subject: Re: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"
On Nov 5, 3:59 pm, Astrid <Astrid7777...@yahoo.com> wrote:

The main irregularity was that he had half a million anonymously
transferred to thee LMT from a secret European bank account and tried
to pawn it off as a donation from someone else. Apparently that was
set up to avoid paying taxes (or hide the fact that they hadn't been
paid). As I heard, the money was withdrawn by then-LMT attorney John
Merrett, and then wired to the US by Andreas Helmut-Lund.

Whether Merrett was just inept or crooked remains to be seen. My guess
is the latter.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Hartley Patterson  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 15:43
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Hartley Patterson <hptt...@daisy.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:43:58 -0000
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 15:43
Subject: Re: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"
he...@nowhere.invalid says:

> On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:52:19 -0000, Hartley Patterson
> <hptt...@daisy.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:

> >That he's apologised to him? Goodness knows. IIRC it was Rathbun, not
> >Rinder, who arranged the settlement with Minton. They were perhaps playing
> >'good cop, bad cop' at the time.

> Rinder was the point person.

> http://www.sptimes.com/2002/07/07/TampaBay/How_Scientology_turne.shtml

> Confessions in Clearwater

Thanks - it was that meeting I was thinking of, but I got the person
wrong.

--
FREEDOM is a trademark owned by
Religious Technology Center
http://www.newsfrombree.co.uk/stolgy_0.htm


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Hartley Patterson  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 16:37
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Hartley Patterson <hptt...@daisy.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:37:09 -0000
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 16:37
Subject: Re: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"
Astrid7777...@yahoo.com says:

> I have been
> thinking "settlement" in there somewhere with Rinder, because while
> they have used old clips of him from the cult, why is he not appearing
> on TV or video, or being interviewed, other than in the print media?

You don't fire off all your ammunition at once unless it's really going to
obliterate your opponent atomic bomb style. We wish!

What has been working?

Not the big >9000 Anonymous protest in February 2008, but the steady
monthly push against the Orgs and the raids in between that followed.
Not the big articles in newspapers, not the big exposes on TV, not
Panorama saying "hey we haven't done Scientology for a while", but the
drip drip of joking and degrading everywhere.
And now it's the StP Times getting stuck in and indicating that they will
not stop until they get a result.

So I think Rinder is playing it right, reserving some of his firepower for
a moment when things are quiet. So far, that moment has not arrived!

> My initial reaction to reading (a few years after it happened, since
> I'm new to following this) that Rinder and Rathbun were no longer in
> the cult, I assumed the cult would have had to have paid them off to
> gag them. Because they knew too much.

Miscavige still thinks his cult is too scary and powerful to have to bribe
anyone. The agreements, actual or implied, have always been "if you say
nothing, we'll leave you alone. But we'll be watching you, forever" and it
used to be, if not 100% successful, at least 95% so. It's difficult enough
for longtime ex-members to adjust to the reality of the wog world without
having their previous reality chasing after them.

It was only when Rathbun popped up with a webpage, posted to ESMB and
started reconnecting with other ex-members that Miscavige went for him.

> Of all the articles in the St. Pete Times, this recent one on Minton
> was poorly written and confusing. I had trouble following it, and had
> to keep reading certain passages more than once. But, well, at least
> it is out there.

It was a very condensed summary of all the articles they have done in the
past. For the details, you have to go back in their archives. Please bear
in mind that the OG in the USA were deeply divided over this, and ANYTHING
you say will start some of them squabbling again. Sometimes sleeping dogs
should really be left alone.

--
ARS FAQ
Please read before posting
http://www.newsfrombree.co.uk/faq.htm


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Tigger  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 19:26
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Tigger <Tiggerinthe...@webtv.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:26:23 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 19:26
Subject: Re: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"

Eldon wrote:
>The main irregularity was that he had half a million anonymously
> transferred to thee LMT from a secret European bank account and tried
> to pawn it off as a donation from someone else. Apparently that was
> set up to avoid paying taxes (or hide the fact that they hadn't been
> paid). As I heard, the money was withdrawn by then-LMT attorney John
> Merrett, and then wired to the US by Andreas Helmut-Lund.

Minton used both Merrett and Andreas and lied to both of them.    I
think Minton's "fear" of being sent to jail for perjury was a red
herring and not the real reason why $CN was able to get him to turn
traitor.   Minton was in contempt of court already because he would
not answer questions about his money.

Minton's mistress, Stacy Brooks was instrumental in contacting Mike
Rinder to make a deal to get her sugar daddy and his money off the
hook.    Minton and Brooks met numerous times with Rinder and Yingling
WITHOUT THEIR ATTORNEYS being present.   Why, Rinder and Yingling were
even  "advising" them on what to put in their "new" affidavits.

Minton and Brooks even had the nerve to try to get Jesse Prince to
join them in their lies for the CO$.   Prince was so appalled at what
his "friends" were doing and trying to get him to do, he called Minton
a "Scientologist" and contacted the FBI

When the $CN"S Destroy the Attorney Operation didn't succeed in
destroying Ken Dandar, the attorney for Lisa's family and making the
Lisa wrongful death suit go away, Minton joined $CN in other things,
including petitioning for Lisa's family to be removed as trustees of
her estate.

The DANDAR DISQUALIFICATION HEARINGS
(trial testimony, affidavits, judge's ruling, etc. ) were webbed by
Mikey Gornez on his WHYARETHEY DEAD.NET website and told the whole
sordid story of what Minton and Co$ did in their combined attempt to
destroy Ken Dandar and  make the Lisa wrongful death suit "go
away".

 Minton and Brooks even rescinded their affidavits which they had
given in other cases and to other attorneys....Dan Leipold was another
attorney they tried to backstab.

> Whether Merrett was just inept or crooked remains to be seen. My guess
> is the latter.

You forgot one category, Eldon....Lied to, manipulated and misued by
Minton.   My guess would be that one. Merrett is now a judge, isn't
he?

Tigger


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Eldon  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 19:34
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Eldon <EldonB...@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:34:35 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 19:34
Subject: Re: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"
On Nov 5, 8:26 pm, Tigger <Tiggerinthe...@webtv.net> wrote:

An elected one in Jax last I heard. So what does that say one way or
the other? He did too many things wrongly or negligently when he was
representing the LMT not to be highly suspect of being compromised by
Scientology. Maybe Mike Rinder will tell us one day.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Astrid  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 20:15
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Astrid <Astrid7777...@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 12:15:59 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 20:15
Subject: Re: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"
On Nov 5, 9:37 am, Hartley Patterson <hptt...@daisy.freeserve.co.uk>
wrote:

> > My initial reaction to reading (a few years after it happened, since
> > I'm new to following this) that Rinder and Rathbun were no longer in
> > the cult, I assumed the cult would have had to have paid them off to
> > gag them. Because they knew too much.

> Miscavige still thinks his cult is too scary and powerful to have to bribe
> anyone. The agreements, actual or implied, have always been "if you say
> nothing, we'll leave you alone. But we'll be watching you, forever" and it
> used to be, if not 100% successful, at least 95% so. It's difficult enough
> for longtime ex-members to adjust to the reality of the wog world without
> having their previous reality chasing after them.

Very well put. I can accept that. It still boggles my mind, how MUCH
Rinder must know. Director of the OSA International. Even as
spokesperson, he probably had a handle on what was happening, and what
he was instructed to say to cover it up.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Lermanet.com Exposing the CON for 15 years!  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 6 Nov, 05:11
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: "Lermanet.com Exposing the CON for 15 years!" <arnaldole...@lermanet.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 21:11:38 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri 6 Nov 2009 05:11
Subject: Re: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"
On Nov 5, 4:13 am, "Patty Pieniadz" <ppieni...@gmail.com> wrote:

   Like Patricia Greenway 's 2.5 million from Bob?
   http://www.lermanet.com/reference/greedwaysgoldrush.htm


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Zinj  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 6 Nov, 19:51
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Zinj <zinji...@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:51:32 -0500
Local: Fri 6 Nov 2009 19:51
Subject: Re: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"

Patty Pieniadz wrote:
> The one common denominator among Minton's "friends" is that rec'd
> money from him.

> Makes me wonder if Rinder is part of that circle.

I'd consider myself a friend of Bob's and he never gave me any money,
although, he did pay for a hamburger once.  And, I can think of quite a
few people that would apply to.

So; bullshit.

Now, whatever happened to the Lisa Case?  Wasn't there something about
there being 'no gag'??

Zinj


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Tigger  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 6 Nov, 23:12
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Tigger <Tiggerinthe...@webtv.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:12:46 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri 6 Nov 2009 23:12
Subject: Re: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"
On Nov 6, 1:51 pm, Zinj <zinji...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Patty Pieniadz wrote:
> > The one common denominator among Minton's "friends" is that rec'd
> > money from him.

> > Makes me wonder if Rinder is part of that circle.

> I'd consider myself a friend of Bob's and he never gave me any money,
> although, he did pay for a hamburger once.  And, I can think of quite a
> few people that would apply to.

> So; bullshit.

> Now, whatever happened to the Lisa Case?  Wasn't there something about
> there being 'no gag'??

Who told you that?   The master rewriter of history, Arnaldo Lerma?

Tigger


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
henri  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 7 Nov, 01:19
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: henri <he...@nowhere.invalid>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:19:05 -0500
Local: Sat 7 Nov 2009 01:19
Subject: Re: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 21:11:38 -0800 (PST), "Lermanet.com Exposing the
CON for 15 years!" <arnaldole...@lermanet.com> wrote:

>   Like Patricia Greenway 's 2.5 million from Bob?
>   http://www.lermanet.com/reference/greedwaysgoldrush.htm

Thanks for reminding us what a gibbering nutjob you are, by linking to
your incoherent drug-addled imbecility.  You might recall that Bob
actually paid Peter Alexander to make that film.  Nice try though, you
lying sack of shit.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Out_Of_The_Dark  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 7 Nov, 02:30
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Out_Of_The_Dark <formerlyfoo...@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 18:30:09 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat 7 Nov 2009 02:30
Subject: Re: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"
On Nov 2, 2:45 am, Jens Tingleff <jenst...@tingleff.org> wrote:

Tommy Davis is outright lying. Sea Org members follow orders. They
have no say in what they work on and everything is programmed,
monitored, statistically reviewed and condoned by a superior.

That said, Rathbun, in an attempt to minimize his own culpability in
acting on Scientology's behalf ( which he is working hard at evading )
says things here about Minton that are simply not true.  I agree with
Shawn's_Friend:

" This is sad and Rathbun should be ashamed of himself. John Fashanu
has confessed that there was no truth to the charges laid out in the
report that bore his name. He’s asked for forgiveness from the
Nigerian government for the lies he put forth http://www.xenutv.com/blog/?p=3426
"

Rathbun is not going to tell the whole truth because it will make him
look bad and it will give credibility to the critics of scientology
who believe Minton was blackmailed and extorted.

Just look at the end of the latest Rathbun interview where he is asked
to discuss what happened with Don Jason by Tobin or Childs. It was
painfully obvious that Rathbun, who intervened in Jason's escape at
the airport, experienced great discomfort in looking at it from
Jason's POV. That is very telling. Rathbun, pointing the finger at
Miscavige, failed to show responsibility for his complicity in these
terrible acts against members. There are hundreds of people, maybe
thousands, who Miscavige orderd Rathbun to 'handle'. Instead of
accepting responsibility for the things he did and making right by
those he hurt or traumatized, he ignores his past until forced to by a
reporter.

A few of the victims have managed to muster up forgiveness, which I
applaud, but that does not change the lack of humility one would
expect from someone who did these things without a second thought and
when pressed, blames it all on his superior.

He does not want those victims making waves while he leads the charge
in getting Miscavige's deeds made known through media. That's a stupid
and cowardly move. We all want Miscavige out for the same reasons but
it's hypocritical of Rathbun to hide behind his past, and distort
history to avoid his own part in this terrible play.

I hope the reporters ask more hard questions of him, and Rinder
because not doing so allows scientology to spin the story and unfairly
place the blame for these behaviors on Rathbun and Rinder, who were,
if we are to believe Rathbun 'only following orders'. That didn't hold
up for the Nazi's and it should not hold up for Miscavige's henchmen -
whether still in or out.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Zinj  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 7 Nov, 08:58
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Zinj <zinji...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:58:07 -0500
Local: Sat 7 Nov 2009 08:58
Subject: Re: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"

Ken Dandar told me and everyone else that he was gagged.

Did you miss that?

Zinj


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Eldon  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 7 Nov, 10:28
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Eldon <EldonB...@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 02:28:45 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat 7 Nov 2009 10:28
Subject: Re: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"
On Nov 7, 3:30 am, Out_Of_The_Dark <formerlyfoo...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Well, I think you could skip the Nazi analogy. Miscavige isn't waging
war on half of the world, or gassing and incinerating hordes of
people.

My impression is that Rathbun is gradually waking up and becoming more
honest with himself. Rinder will  probably take longer. To some
extent, they can get away with dodging responsibility, but if they
outright lie, somebody will call them on it. Unlike Miscavige, they
are subject to criticism by their peers, meaning the flock of
"independents" Marty and the gang at www.scientology-cult.org have
accumulated.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Tigger  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 7 Nov, 18:20
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Tigger <Tiggerinthe...@webtv.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:20:12 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat 7 Nov 2009 18:20
Subject: Re: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"
On Nov 7, 2:58 am, Zinj <zinji...@yahoo.com> wrote:

No Zinj.  But that wasn't in your post, was it?  You posted:  "Wasn't
there something about there being 'no gag'?" which "suggested" you
were questioning the truth of there being a gag.  I was asking you for
the "source" of the allegation that there was "NO GAG".

So, can you answer the question?

Tigger


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Patty Pieniadz  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 7 Nov, 18:36
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: "Patty Pieniadz" <ppieni...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 13:36:38 -0500
Local: Sat 7 Nov 2009 18:36
Subject: Re: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"

"Lermanet.com Exposing the CON for 15 years!"

<arnaldole...@lermanet.com> wrote in message

news:b38288c9-866e-4eef-8aa8-b399b6e585fe@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 5, 4:13 am, "Patty Pieniadz" <ppieni...@gmail.com> wrote:

   Like Patricia Greenway 's 2.5 million from Bob?
   http://www.lermanet.com/reference/greedwaysgoldrush.htm

Arnie, I heard you got a big pile of money from Bob.  Of course
that was a loan.  I assume you've paid him back from the sale of your
house.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Eldon  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 7 Nov, 18:39
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Eldon <EldonB...@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:39:22 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat 7 Nov 2009 18:39
Subject: Re: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"
On Nov 7, 7:36 pm, "Patty Pieniadz" <ppieni...@gmail.com> wrote:

Naw, Arnie paid back Bob $10,000 from the sale if his computer. Isn't
that about right?

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Tigger  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 7 Nov, 19:43
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Tigger <Tiggerinthe...@webtv.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 11:43:04 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat 7 Nov 2009 19:43
Subject: Re: "How Scientology got to Bob Minton"
On Nov 7, 12:39 pm, Eldon <EldonB...@aol.com> wrote:

Well gee, after all Lerma has done for his "best friend", I'd think
Minton would not only forgive the debt, but pay Lerma a bonus.

Tigger


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google