This girl is really very young and very sharp and a staff member told her that if she did not pay for and do the "Ups and Downs" course at the church that she would die just like the girl before her.
Watch the whole video, it is short, and she talks about this guy in the middle:
On 8 Nov, 10:23, Lawrence <lawrencetooma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This girl is really very young and very sharp and a staff member > told her that if she did not pay for and do the "Ups and Downs" > course at the church that she would die just like the girl before her.
> Watch the whole video, it is short, and she talks about this guy > in the middle:
What is there to admire? She is not negative about the subject, however she was put down by some persuasive people. And then she went for that. Where is the displayed distinction between these separated matters?
> On 8 Nov, 10:23, Lawrence <lawrencetooma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This girl is really very young and very sharp and a staff member > > told her that if she did not pay for and do the "Ups and Downs" > > course at the church that she would die just like the girl before her.
> > Watch the whole video, it is short, and she talks about this guy > > in the middle:
> What is there to admire? She is not negative about the subject, > however she was put down by some persuasive people. And then she went > for that. Where is the displayed distinction between these separated > matters?
> On Nov 8, 5:41 am, Roadrunner <roadrunner.eni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 8 Nov, 10:23, Lawrence <lawrencetooma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > This girl is really very young and very sharp and a staff member > > > told her that if she did not pay for and do the "Ups and Downs" > > > course at the church that she would die just like the girl before her.
> > > Watch the whole video, it is short, and she talks about this guy > > > in the middle:
> > What is there to admire? She is not negative about the subject, > > however she was put down by some persuasive people. And then she went > > for that. Where is the displayed distinction between these separated > > matters?
> > RR
> I don't know what you mean.
There is the subject of Dianetics and Scientology, as opposed to the people involved with it and the things that they say and/or do. These are 2 DIFFERENT matters...
> On 8 Nov, 12:25, Lawrence <lawrencetooma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Nov 8, 5:41 am, Roadrunner <roadrunner.eni...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On 8 Nov, 10:23, Lawrence <lawrencetooma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > This girl is really very young and very sharp and a staff member >> > > told her that if she did not pay for and do the "Ups and Downs" >> > > course at the church that she would die just like the girl before >> > > her.
>> > > Watch the whole video, it is short, and she talks about this guy >> > > in the middle:
>> > What is there to admire? She is not negative about the subject, >> > however she was put down by some persuasive people. And then she >> > went >> > for that. Where is the displayed distinction between these >> > separated >> > matters?
>> > RR
>> I don't know what you mean.
> There is the subject of Dianetics and Scientology, as opposed to the > people involved with it and the things that they say and/or do. These > are 2 DIFFERENT matters...
> On 8 Nov, 12:25, Lawrence <lawrencetooma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 8, 5:41 am, Roadrunner <roadrunner.eni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 8 Nov, 10:23, Lawrence <lawrencetooma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > This girl is really very young and very sharp and a staff member > > > > told her that if she did not pay for and do the "Ups and Downs" > > > > course at the church that she would die just like the girl before her.
> > > > Watch the whole video, it is short, and she talks about this guy > > > > in the middle:
> > > What is there to admire? She is not negative about the subject, > > > however she was put down by some persuasive people. And then she went > > > for that. Where is the displayed distinction between these separated > > > matters?
> > > RR
> > I don't know what you mean.
> There is the subject of Dianetics and Scientology, as opposed to the > people involved with it and the things that they say and/or do. These > are 2 DIFFERENT matters...
Ah! Wouldn't the world be a lot better of without the constantly misapplied and misunderstood subject of scientology? One might even think it is because of what the subject of scientology does to people practicing it.
Peter
"That which works in $cientology is not unique to $cientology, and that which is unique to $cientology does not work." - Prufrock
> On 8 nov, 12:48, Roadrunner <roadrunner.eni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 8 Nov, 12:25, Lawrence <lawrencetooma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Nov 8, 5:41 am, Roadrunner <roadrunner.eni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On 8 Nov, 10:23, Lawrence <lawrencetooma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > This girl is really very young and very sharp and a staff member > > > > > told her that if she did not pay for and do the "Ups and Downs" > > > > > course at the church that she would die just like the girl before her.
> > > > > Watch the whole video, it is short, and she talks about this guy > > > > > in the middle:
> > > > What is there to admire? She is not negative about the subject, > > > > however she was put down by some persuasive people. And then she went > > > > for that. Where is the displayed distinction between these separated > > > > matters?
> > > > RR
> > > I don't know what you mean.
> > There is the subject of Dianetics and Scientology, as opposed to the > > people involved with it and the things that they say and/or do. These > > are 2 DIFFERENT matters...
> Ah! Wouldn't the world be a lot better of without the constantly > misapplied and misunderstood subject of scientology? > One might even think it is because of what the subject of scientology > does to people practicing it.
> Peter
> "That which works in $cientology > is not unique to $cientology, > and that which is unique to $cientology > does not work." > - Prufrock
|
