Google Mail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Anon is at it again. This time not just a protest
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  10 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Follow-up To:
Add Cc | Add Follow-up to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers that you hear
 
LordXenuCruise  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 05:42
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: LordXenuCruise <LordXenuCru...@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 21:42:20 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 05:42
Subject: Anon is at it again. This time not just a protest
The Church of Scientology's European website was hacked and defaced
earlier today by hackers claiming to be members of Anonymous.
Anonymous proponents previously hacked Scientology's main website,
www.scientology.org. The group also protested the church in February
2008.

Screenshot of scientology-europe.org/index.htm (from November 3, 2009)
Image: whyweprotest.net.
Another website run by the church, freedom-belgium.org, was also
hacked and defaced. The hacked websites contain content taken
from .whyaretheydead.info, a website critical of Scientology which
lists members of the Church who are alleged to have died while in its
care. Anonymous has stated that whyaretheydead.info was not involved
in the hacking, but the hackers merely used content from their
website.
This is not the first time hackers have defaced Scientology websites.
In January 2008, 'Anonymous' hacked the Church's international website
by using a denial-of-service attack. The attack caused the website to
be inaccessible for nearly 24 hours.

http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Article/143314/Scientology_website_hacked


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mike Thomas  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 11:13
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Mike Thomas <active.m3...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:13:04 GMT
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 11:13
Subject: Re: Anon is at it again. This time not just a protest
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

disappointing, it's like someone brining Molotov Cocktails to a peaceful
protest. No need to break the law.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.12 (Darwin)

iJwEAQECAAYFAkrysz8ACgkQQOyfU0q29nauLgQAwJYE1PaQCBgOJBsVNuvZh/DN
dSRcj/AWOTWSrqC3LCVB1ysQN6lWeISaszjZOHPhtWiv/i1spnJcnqRCdR+DMDOA
Oy1kl77MjoXPzTSQ9jZobpd19xW8zShpQx+LMSeCpTVzSq/0KFBX4mzUbPUGUKKr
1lmDc229L/eXWfinT8Q=
=jlUI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Android Cat  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 13:01
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: "Android Cat" <androidca...@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 08:01:13 -0500
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 13:01
Subject: Re: Anon is at it again. This time not just a protest

The confirmation that anyone in the Anonymous collective had anything to do
with it is pretty weak.  (Comments in the hacked page source.)  It could
have been a CoS op, working tirelessly on trying to get the "Terrorist"
label to stick, although they probably wouldn't have used a copy of
WhyAreTheyDead.

Meanwhile, CoS shuffled scientology-europe.org behind the Prolexic shield
for now.

--
Ron of that ilk.


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
xenufrance  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 13:01
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: "xenufrance" <xenufra...@free.fr>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:01:20 +0100
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 13:01
Subject: Re: Anon is at it again. This time not just a protest

"Mike Thomas" <active.m3...@gmail.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
4ryIm.52342$ze1.36...@news-server.bigpond.net.au...

well, there is not the least need of anonyous people to defaced the
scientology websites: cultists inside can very well do it themselves. Even
Dwarfscavige could act that way to try to get rid of "anonymous". It is not
, by far, the firt time that cultists have tried to make believe that they
were enemies to get at anticult throats.

That's even what they do permanently, by defacing, "sort of", the vocabulary
and words used in topics like mind, psychologye, religion, spirituality,
where a criminal gang is called the best religion ever and its opponents,
the worse implanters ever.

roger


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
barbz  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 13:32
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: barbz <xenub...@netscape.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:32:50 -0800
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 13:32
Subject: Re: Anon is at it again. This time not just a protest

Ah...bleed money, cult!

--
xenubarb
Chaplain, ARSCCwdne

A walk down the path of history is crunchy with the crispy corpses of
those who pooh-poohed or ignored the clown car of ridicule when it
pulled-up to the curb.

Stephen Jones


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
henri  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 14:51
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: henri <he...@nowhere.invalid>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:51:45 -0500
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 14:51
Subject: Re: Anon is at it again. This time not just a protest
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 08:01:13 -0500, "Android Cat"

<androidca...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Article/143314/Scientology_website_hacked
>The confirmation that anyone in the Anonymous collective had anything to do
>with it is pretty weak.  (Comments in the hacked page source.)  It could
>have been a CoS op, working tirelessly on trying to get the "Terrorist"
>label to stick, although they probably wouldn't have used a copy of
>WhyAreTheyDead.

I'm pretty sure they'd *never* have used a copy of WATD.  If they'd
done it it would have just been illiterate threats against themselves.
There's no reason to think anyone previously connected to Chanology
did it, though, other than some vague probability.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Tigger  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 18:17
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Tigger <Tiggerinthe...@webtv.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:17:03 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 18:17
Subject: Re: Anon is at it again. This time not just a protest
On Nov 5, 7:01 am, "Android Cat" <androidca...@hotmail.com> wrote:

I agree.  It could have been an OSA operation to focus the attention
on crimes of their enemies.   It could also have been some individual
who thought it would be neat to do something so stupid.  I think most
connected with Anonymous have learned by now that such "pranks" are
stupid and counterproductive and come back to haunt them.

Did someone get Mikey Gormez's WhyTheyAreDead website webbed?   I
certainly hope so.  Mikey's site was fantastic.  If so, what's the url
for the preseent site?   It was my understanding that the original
website expired/disappeared  before it could be transferred to (or
webbed by) someone else.

Tigger


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Eldon  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 18:32
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: Eldon <EldonB...@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:32:05 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 18:32
Subject: Re: Anon is at it again. This time not just a protest
On Nov 5, 3:51 pm, henri <he...@nowhere.invalid> wrote:

> On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 08:01:13 -0500, "Android Cat"

> <androidca...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Article/143314/Scientology_website_hacked
> >The confirmation that anyone in the Anonymous collective had anything to do
> >with it is pretty weak.  (Comments in the hacked page source.)  It could
> >have been a CoS op, working tirelessly on trying to get the "Terrorist"
> >label to stick, although they probably wouldn't have used a copy of
> >WhyAreTheyDead.

> I'm pretty sure they'd *never* have used a copy of WATD.  If they'd
> done it it would have just been illiterate threats against themselves.
> There's no reason to think anyone previously connected to Chanology
> did it, though, other than some vague probability.

Correct, they wouldn't hack their own site that way if at all. I don't
think they're at all strategic about the Internet, since LRH died long
before he could write anything about how to "handle" it. And if
someone or a few people from Chanology did it, so what? There's a good
reason why Anonymous called itself that.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
barbz  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 18:53
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: barbz <xenub...@netscape.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:53:13 -0800
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 18:53
Subject: Re: Anon is at it again. This time not just a protest

Fits in with their pattern of sending themselves bomb threats, doesn't it...

--
xenubarb
Chaplain, ARSCCwdne

A walk down the path of history is crunchy with the crispy corpses of
those who pooh-poohed or ignored the clown car of ridicule when it
pulled-up to the curb.

Stephen Jones


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Magoo  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 5 Nov, 21:32
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
From: "Magoo" <mago...@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 13:32:59 -0800
Local: Thurs 5 Nov 2009 21:32
Subject: Re: Anon is at it again. This time not just a protest

"LordXenuCruise" <LordXenuCru...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:c45609ee-f442-4dfe-810d-7c7798aec97d@b36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

Well, since I opened up C of $/OSA's "Anonymous" accounts, and  they told me
they'd hired "Computer Experts" to do a lot of the work,
it isn't too impossible to imagine these "Experts" getting an order to
"Degrade Anonymous any way you can"....and thus.....

Did they?  Who knows. Right now, Scientology has SO much *shit*
flying their way, they're literally sliding down Niagara Falls, yelling
"Fire" and hoping someone gets it.

Don't miss: www.blownforgood.com (Marc Headley's book)
and
www.mybillionyearcontract.com (Nancy Many's book)

Marc is on the radio tonight, also.

"Today Thursday November 5'th 2009 in Los Angeles on the talk show radio
station " KFI - 640 AM " at 6:00p.m. Dj's John and Ken will be interviewing
Marc Headley (was out at "Gold" with head of Scientology for 15 years and
escaped out ) on his defection and? his ~~~HOT~~~ new book " BLOWN FOR GOOD
"

Tory/Magoo


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google