<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>alt.radio.digital Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital</link>
  <description>Digital radio signals.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>UCB UK &amp; Panjab Radio now on D1</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/225fa12e3f373396/879e817ca7281bd7?show_docid=879e817ca7281bd7</link>
  <description>
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://radiotoday.co.uk/news.php?extend.5422.5&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;The arrival of the first Panjabi radio station on the national airwaves is &lt;br&gt; long overdue.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; I disagree. &lt;br&gt; (Proof that I am a racist after all)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/225fa12e3f373396/879e817ca7281bd7?show_docid=879e817ca7281bd7</guid>
  <author>
  dab...@fooked.com
  (DAB sounds worse than FM)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2009 01:06:59 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: BBC knew AAC was available in Real Player in 2006</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/d35e193d19e7f962/5485fb09b99652c8?show_docid=5485fb09b99652c8</link>
  <description>
  &amp;lt;snip&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; Also, James &amp;quot;pathological liar&amp;quot; Cridland launched 128 kbps AAC streams using &lt;br&gt; Real Player when he worked at Virgin. So, he obviously knew all along that &lt;br&gt; he could use AAC in Real Player.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/d35e193d19e7f962/5485fb09b99652c8?show_docid=5485fb09b99652c8</guid>
  <author>
  dab...@fooked.com
  (DAB sounds worse than FM)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2009 00:45:10 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>BBC knew AAC was available in Real Player in 2006</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/d35e193d19e7f962/b4c2380d883203e4?show_docid=b4c2380d883203e4</link>
  <description>
  Here&#39;s a BBC document written by Alan Ogilvie (who worked for John Ousby in &lt;br&gt; the BBC Distribution Technologies team) in Autumn 2006 about codecs for &lt;br&gt; Internet streaming: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/y94m95a&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;Real Audio even drops to AAC encoding for any audio encoded over 96kbps, &lt;br&gt; hence it is also &lt;br&gt; natively supported in Real/Helix.&amp;quot;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/d35e193d19e7f962/b4c2380d883203e4?show_docid=b4c2380d883203e4</guid>
  <author>
  dab...@fooked.com
  (DAB sounds worse than FM)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2009 00:39:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Oh dear Digital to reduce after 2012?..</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/30ab94efaee2304e/10cbb200a8c03ab8?show_docid=10cbb200a8c03ab8</link>
  <description>
  Probably Jamie Powell.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/30ab94efaee2304e/10cbb200a8c03ab8?show_docid=10cbb200a8c03ab8</guid>
  <author>
  dab...@fooked.com
  (DAB sounds worse than FM)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 23:50:18 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: DRDB says 10 million DAB radios in UK</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/7ddb2d8bab3bb3f5/87b204e0bbca3bd7?show_docid=87b204e0bbca3bd7</link>
  <description>
  Indeed. &lt;br&gt; He&#39;s deliberately redefining the term &amp;quot;digital radio&amp;quot; so that it only &lt;br&gt; applies to DAB - that&#39;s blatantly dishonest and blatantly biased. He &lt;br&gt; basically wants everyone to think of DAB when they think of the term &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;digital radio&amp;quot; so that the vast majority of people will buy DAB between now &lt;br&gt; and digital switchover. It&#39;s the most arrogant thing the BBC has done since
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/7ddb2d8bab3bb3f5/87b204e0bbca3bd7?show_docid=87b204e0bbca3bd7</guid>
  <author>
  dab...@fooked.com
  (DAB sounds worse than FM)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 23:27:15 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>DAB in decline says The Saviour of Digital Radio</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/7f42ef671043bffc/c2730055140e6ccc?show_docid=c2730055140e6ccc</link>
  <description>
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://radiotoday.co.uk/news.php?extend.5421.5&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;If there are still 120m analogue radios in circulation, which industry &lt;br&gt; RAJAR figures show, it means that after ten years of DAB less than ten per &lt;br&gt; cent of UK radios have been converted to digital.&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;Radio listeners have spoken. Today&#39;s disappointing DAB sales announcement
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/7f42ef671043bffc/c2730055140e6ccc?show_docid=c2730055140e6ccc</guid>
  <author>
  dab...@fooked.com
  (DAB sounds worse than FM)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 23:04:31 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: DRDB says 10 million DAB radios in UK</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/7ddb2d8bab3bb3f5/08b2e6ffba5bea25?show_docid=08b2e6ffba5bea25</link>
  <description>
  Ben wrote: &lt;br&gt; Oh well, that just proves that DAB is not fit for the digital age. :-( &lt;br&gt; Yep. There are many digital systems that could trance DAB. &lt;br&gt; They made the mistake of choosing DAB, and the last thing they want to &lt;br&gt; do is admit their mistake. Instead they would rather do everything they &lt;br&gt; can to make it a success, to try to prove that they didn&#39;t get it wrong
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/7ddb2d8bab3bb3f5/08b2e6ffba5bea25?show_docid=08b2e6ffba5bea25</guid>
  <author>
  rp.evans.nos...@tiscali.co.uk
  (Richard Evans)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 22:25:58 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: DRDB says 10 million DAB radios in UK</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/7ddb2d8bab3bb3f5/e7f02f1af306faea?show_docid=e7f02f1af306faea</link>
  <description>
  I think simple might be an appropriate description for the people who &lt;br&gt; decided low bit rate DAB was a good idea.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/7ddb2d8bab3bb3f5/e7f02f1af306faea?show_docid=e7f02f1af306faea</guid>
  <author>
  rp.evans.nos...@tiscali.co.uk
  (Richard Evans)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 22:20:22 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: DRDB says 10 million DAB radios in UK</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/7ddb2d8bab3bb3f5/d3a9001594644aa4?show_docid=d3a9001594644aa4</link>
  <description>
  What an unbelievably crass thing to say. In his speech, he talks of all &lt;br&gt; sorts of ways to get radio, through iPods, phones, internet, etc. Then &lt;br&gt; he wants to use the term which covers them all and apply it to just one &lt;br&gt; technology. If I were cynical I&#39;d think he was deliberately trying to &lt;br&gt; muddy the waters.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/7ddb2d8bab3bb3f5/d3a9001594644aa4?show_docid=d3a9001594644aa4</guid>
  <author>
  &quot;[mysigninname...@hotmail.co.uk
  (Ben)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 21:21:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Oh dear Digital to reduce after 2012?..</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/30ab94efaee2304e/34d769ff0da8f560?show_docid=34d769ff0da8f560</link>
  <description>
  Who the fcuk was operating the camera between 17:10 and 21:25 mins ? &lt;br&gt; I watched the original, but switched off a minute into that segment in disgust.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/30ab94efaee2304e/34d769ff0da8f560?show_docid=34d769ff0da8f560</guid>
  <author>
  mark.car...@invalid.invalid
  (Mark Carver)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 21:20:40 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: DRDB says 10 million DAB radios in UK</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/7ddb2d8bab3bb3f5/ea9895991c0c498b?show_docid=ea9895991c0c498b</link>
  <description>
  That&#39;s because of this: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/speeches/stories/davie_manchester.shtml&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;Let me just make a few quick points on DAB which I hope will soon be called &lt;br&gt; simply Digital Radio!&amp;quot;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/7ddb2d8bab3bb3f5/ea9895991c0c498b?show_docid=ea9895991c0c498b</guid>
  <author>
  dab...@fooked.com
  (DAB sounds worse than FM)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 19:49:41 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: French commercial broadcasters opposed to digital radio!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/a7e5f3209e76d1cc/b6177dabaf39b343?show_docid=b6177dabaf39b343</link>
  <description>
  That is probably true. &lt;br&gt; If we are talking about reception inside a building then it&#39;s a fair &lt;br&gt; point. But if we are talking about signals getting past buildings (which &lt;br&gt; is what I thought you meant), then I think you will find that defraction &lt;br&gt; around a building is more significant than penetration through it.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/a7e5f3209e76d1cc/b6177dabaf39b343?show_docid=b6177dabaf39b343</guid>
  <author>
  rp.evans.nos...@tiscali.co.uk
  (Richard Evans)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 19:20:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: DRDB says 10 million DAB radios in UK</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/7ddb2d8bab3bb3f5/d448d65244277e6c?show_docid=d448d65244277e6c</link>
  <description>
  And I wonder how many were not returned, because people although knowing &lt;br&gt; they didn&#39;t sound right, couldn&#39;t actually explain what the problem was.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/7ddb2d8bab3bb3f5/d448d65244277e6c?show_docid=d448d65244277e6c</guid>
  <author>
  rp.evans.nos...@tiscali.co.uk
  (Richard Evans)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 19:11:41 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: DRDB says 10 million DAB radios in UK</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/7ddb2d8bab3bb3f5/bc4484cd0868b068?show_docid=bc4484cd0868b068</link>
  <description>
  Oops forgot the smiley. &lt;br&gt; I was joking about paying for he carriage fees. &lt;br&gt; Well sort of ;-)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/7ddb2d8bab3bb3f5/bc4484cd0868b068?show_docid=bc4484cd0868b068</guid>
  <author>
  rp.evans.nos...@tiscali.co.uk
  (Richard Evans)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 19:08:01 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: DRDB says 10 million DAB radios in UK</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/7ddb2d8bab3bb3f5/f91b541f4b8da87a?show_docid=f91b541f4b8da87a</link>
  <description>
  I suspect the colour screens are for the slide shows, carrying &lt;br&gt; advertising, to help pay for the astounding carriage fees. &lt;br&gt; Richard E.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.radio.digital/browse_frm/thread/7ddb2d8bab3bb3f5/f91b541f4b8da87a?show_docid=f91b541f4b8da87a</guid>
  <author>
  rp.evans.nos...@tiscali.co.uk
  (Richard Evans)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2009 19:06:36 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
