Google Mail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion 'Ethical' SEO?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Follow-up To:
Add Cc | Add Follow-up to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers that you hear
 
Big Bill  
View profile   Translate to Translated (View Original)
 More options 8 Nov 2004, 08:57
Newsgroups: alt.internet.search-engines
From: Big Bill <kr...@cityscape.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 08:57:37 GMT
Local: Mon 8 Nov 2004 08:57
Subject: Re: 'Ethical' SEO?
On Mon, 08 Nov 2004 02:55:52 GMT, SEO Dave

<seo-dav...@AMsearch-engine-optimization-services.co.uk> wrote:
>On Sun, 07 Nov 2004 07:18:17 GMT, from_...@nomail.com (C.W.) wrote:

>>On Sun, 07 Nov 2004 05:17:18 GMT, SEO Dave
>><seo-dav...@AMsearch-engine-optimization-services.co.uk> wrote:

>>>If there is permission to add a link and in the case of an SEO firm
>>>who should understand how adding a link from a clients site to their
>>>SEO site will not benefit the client site explains the cons of this
>>>arrangement, then I don't see a problem.

>>Say I design a site for someone and I state upfront that in exhange
>>for my services I will place a link on the site's pages I worked on
>>[no discount]. I look at the footer of some sites I come across that I
>>like the layout/design of - to see who did the work. I sort of expect
>>to see it if the site owner had someone else do the site design for
>>them.

>The link per se isn't the problem, it's the fact an SEO is taking
>advantage of a clients site knowing it will hurt the clients site.

Not everyone would agree that it does though.

>They are hired to help, not take advantage.

>Most web site designers know nothing about SEO, so like you say their
>link is there for advertising reasons not PR. If an SEO argues it's
>there for advertising only they are either BSing or not very good at
>SEO. Either way you should steer clear of SEOs who expect a link.

I expect a link! Only the one a site, mind, but I still expect it.

>>Part of the deal as far as I am concerned - just like the phone
>>number listed on a billboard of the company to contact if you too want
>>to advertise on a billboard.

>Not really the same. The billboard is not owned by the advertiser,
>when a SEO or site designer creates a site for a client, it's the
>clients site. Also the number on the billboard is not going to reduce
>the effectiveness of the ad.

>>So if I put my link there - it is there _not_ for the oh-so-precious
>>PR but to let others, visiting that site, who did the site design and
>>maybe consider contacting me for the same services.

>Why would anyone have a problem with the above (assuming the client is
>happy with the link of course)?

>It's the intent that's the problem here. A small footer link at the
>bottom of every page to Billy Bob's Web Design like the phone number
>on a billboard will not reduce the effectiveness of the site when a
>visitor is viewing. So a site designer adding a link will believe the
>link will not do any harm. SEOs know it will, so shouldn't do it.

I don't know that! I just wouldn't do it because I think it's overkill
and it looks tasteless.

And who was it telling me off for not snipping?

BB
www.kruse.co.uk S...@kruse.demon.co.uk


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message, you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google